I can’t think of a single thing that more taxes don’t fix. Am I a registered European now? Do I need to slobber on a paki dick also?
>>538025577neets big mad
Hope they don't tax my big white cock by the inch
>>538025577>ResearchersIs this a new euphemism for Jew?
>>538025577Problem officer?
>>538025735reee'searchers
>>538025735Yes.
>>538025753car chode
>>538025807Toyota Chode-cruiser
>>538025577Researchers should remove all foreign objects out of the arses frist then their heads.Taxing the length of the vehicle is turbo retarded.Western Australia we do rego by weight. The fatter you are the more damage you do to the road.I know those fucking banana benders tax it based on cylinders for some fucking reason.
>>538025577> researchersK, keep me posted.
>>538025577they should be taxing scooters and bykes, stupid researches with no life
>>538025577>researchersgot damn leftist scum
>>538025932The size of the vehicle has increased because of "researchers" who simply wanted to put a stop to vehicles in the first place, but car manufacturer "researchers" being the pilpul experts that they are found a loophole to exploit. This is just the other tribe of "researchers" expressing their shitter shattering.
>>538025577are those researches European?
>>538026083WHAT!
>>538026269*sigh*I forget that Australians aren't very bright.Vehicle sizes are a direct result of circumventing fleet fuel economy standards. Now the anti-car kikes are just going to make owning a car impossible to afford.
>>538025577If they fix the emissions regulations so vehicles stop getting bigger to exploit them the problem will fix itself.
>>538025753>two steering wheels
>>538025577Why doesn't the government own a minority control over every national industry and subsidize the tax burden on The People by being incentivized to continue real economic growth, and by "real" I mean growth which isn't manipulated by inflated GDP numbers.Seems like this would accomplish all the same things as higher taxes while also doing the one thing high taxes cannot do, which is stimulate economic growth and/or incentivize industrial/technological growth.If the coffers of the State were even somewhat directly linked to the prosperity of the people, then the State would have a harder time justifying a lot of the horrific policies they've undertaken in the last 15 years,
>>538025577I don't want owners of bloated clown shitboxes taxed, I want them killed.
>>538025577>while making compact cars cheaper and there's the classic lie. Micro shit boxes would be maybe 5% cheaper, otherwise it's just a tax grab.gotta pay for those Israeli missiles and data centre power plants somehow
>>538029333Oy vey quit the antisemitism
>>538027167One for the front wheels and one for the back wheels, duh.
>>538025577That's because battery fags are mad they have to pay more taxes because their shitbox golf cart has a fat fucking ass. Right now it's done by weight, as weight causes more damage to the road. What damage does it being bigger do? Nothing. Those 2 vehicles weigh roughly the same.
>>538029333Demand would skyrocket, they'd definitely jack up prices. Not to mention the loss of sales on every other vehicle they produce that gets a new ass fucking tax.
>>538025735We need a second list
It should be based on weight, as that's the primary factor in how much it wears on the road. They are now going after size instead of weight because EVs are far heavier than ICE vehicles and they sure as hell aren't going to charge EVs more.
>>538025577>Tax cars by inch>Tesla that weighs 4 tons gets taxed less than a van that weighs 2 tonsYou may just be a retard. >>538028984If you try to shove me into a fiat It's a total society collapsing issue. Americans are not 5'2'' like you people. I'm 6'7'', most white Americans are around this height. I simply cannot fit into European cars.
>>538025577Let's just kill the shit out of those researcher fucks before their stupidity can spread any farther. It might be too late already. We better get to work fellas.
>>538025577Lynching just needs to be reclassified as a form of suicide. Problems would resolve themselves quickly.
>>538027428Owning affordable vehicles is a freedom that the "researcher" are trying to outlaw. This has fuck all to do with safety. It is entirely about stripping away freedom of self determination and increasing leverage for control.
>>538027167Boats do that too, fool
>>538025639provide evidence
>>538029333They will loose money on this farse and be excited about it. The goal is to remover privately owned vehicles.
>>538025577The tax money goes back to rich people.
>>538025577Car fags are slaves
The 2 door Wrangler (and Bronco) is one of the shortest cars on the market so it would classify this gas guzzler as an economy car
>>538027167Maximum turning
>>538033639Correct. The citizens of the U.S. firmly rejected the idea of “walkable” (non-driving) society. Kikes want to force it on us via the European method. IE: making it incredibly expensive through multiple levels of taxation.
>entire car market is bloated and ruined by (now defunct) CAFE regulations that were poorly thought out>do it again but with even less thoughtnu-suvs and cucktrucks are disgusting but offering incentives to own more efficient, smaller vehicles is a better path forward.
Honestly, I like compact cars. The main issue I have with them that at least 7 out of 10 models look like shit. Literally cuckbox.
small vehicles don't exist anymore because your knees become the crumple zone.
>>538035054It’s impossible to make a car 1/3 of the size of a regular vehicle that doesn’t look like a toy.
>>538035054Try something like pic related
>>538035292I'm fine with electric car that looks like a toy, but it has to have some presence of mind to look like a car.
>>538025753>it gets windy>entire thing tips overno problem at all
>>538034705this car may be ridiculous but it has what the cool kids call "aura"
>>538025577Weird. I can't think of a single problem I would actually trust the government to fix in the first place. You'd unironically be much better off, and history shows this, doing away with taxes entirely and relying on charity from charitable people who actually want to solve problems. Government officials are people who are SUPPOSED to solve your problems and it is literally THEIR JOB to do so, but there is no reason why government officials would have any actual DESIRE to do so. Charity from charitable people is actually more reliable, because it's driven by genuine feelings and desire, not just a job position you're supposed to do when you're on the clock. Charity has faded away primarily because of increased tax levels. So instead of poor people being able to rely on charities or fraternities like was once common, we now give all that money to government officials who use it to buy 200,000 dollars worth of "hot dogs" for their birthday parties and "business trips" for themselves.
