>Because these officers were subject to the President’s superintendence, they had to be removable by him at will. The power to remove at will was a necessary corollary of the Constitution’s design. The “unity” of the Executive Branch would be “destroyed” if it were vested “ostensibly in one man, subject in whole or in part to the control and co-operation of others, in the capacity of counselors to him.” Id., No. 70, at 424 (A. Hamilton). Text and structure thus both taught that the President had to be able to remove those who fail to live up to their duties, lest he fail to live up to his. What the fuck do these dumb, crusty fucks think about the collusion between president and congress under partisan rubrics, then? If the constitution is so fucking holy and almighty to these ideologues, why not focus their attention on the real problem?Totally illegitimate court. We're gonna pack the bench soon.
>>538039580I know her videos were cringy and her Dad threatened us but I don't think we needed the president to sue Jessie Slaughter.
>>538039635this. the consequences were never the same. what more can be done?!
>>538039580WaaaahhhhLaw say the Boss can fire his Employees!!!1!Waaaahhhh
