How do Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, and his other subjects suffer the indignity and embarrassment of a foreign monarch? The guy isn't even eligible for citizenship in his own dominions, except for the UK. >but he has no power!If the guy has no wieldable power, then why keep him? Why have Governors-General appointed to act in his stead? Why delegate the King's veto power to the Governors-General if they cannot use it? Why not elect your own head of state? On the other hand, if the guy had political power, then his biologically inherited position delegitimizes the otherwise democratic nations. It's genuinely embarrassing.
>>538057638>the indignity and embarrassment of a foreign monarch?I'd rather have King George than a diapered dementia patient.
>>538058411they are cut from the same cloth retard
>>538058411>whutabout Trump!This ain't about Charlie as a person. It's about the monarchary and the status he enjoys as monarch over foreign realms.
>>538057638Glad i live in a monarchy tbqh so i dont need to put up with fruity yankee republican bullshit. Go look at how leftarded the irish republicans are yank.
>>538057638>Why delegate the King's veto power to the Governors-General if they cannot use it?Qrd?The sovreign has a ton of power but it's largely hidden behind the governor generals and a secret veto for the UK.
>>538059081Section 55 of the British North America Act of 1867, aka the Canadian Constitution of 1867 says the Governor General may “assent thereto in the Queen’s Name,” “withhold the Queen’s Assent,” or “reserve the Bill for the Signification of the Queen’s Pleasure.”A Governor General has not withheld Royal assent since 1878. So what's the point of the Governor General's soft veto power if he cannot wield it?
>>538058994>I like the monarchy because... Americans! and Irish! Monarchists are retarded
>>538057638The treaties expire when they do.Canada is leased by the royals.No one here "owns" anything.Also see "Crown Corporation"
