You're not white if you can't trace your ancestry to Ancient Rome (or earlier).Here is my 40x Great-grandfather, the last man to rule both halves of the Roman Empire.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I
>spaghettinigger
>>538058005>shitalianYou’re not white
I can trace my ancestry to the people who burnt Rome (all the times)...
>>538058005Based desu i can only trace 1 side of my family back to getting off the boat in NY in the early 1900s.
>>538058386>>538058394You were saying?
>>538058005>>538058990You guys know that FamilySearch is plagued with schizo people, right?One time I was fighting an old American lady who kept defacing my family tree (she wanted to connect with King David or some shit). At some point I asked, 'What are your sources?' and she literally said, 'It was revealed to me in a dream.'Anything pre-17th century is pretty much a guess because we only started recording births and marriages after the Council of Trent during the Reformation. And surnames only became hereditary around this same time...t. Actual genealogistTL;DR Everyone claiming to be royalty has most likely been misled by a schizo Mormon who added Ragnar and Jesus to your own tree.
How is that possible though, the Valentinian bloodline dies off after olybrius in 525 ad and as far as I’m aware eucidocia had no children.
>>538059659See >>538058990
>>538059532European nobility have always kept records of lineages. All you have to do is connect to them post-1700s and your pedigree is pretty reliable (as far as they can be). Queen Elizabeth was my 5th cousin. Founding stock Americans have finer pedigrees than Brazilian monkeys. This isn't even uncommon here.
>>538059984European nobility did not mix with peasants all the way up to the 20th century.Also, Trump posted his tree, and it took me 5 minutes to find the mistake someone made. They confused someone who was a ship captain with a fisher. Many such cases...
>>538060510Royalty may not have mixed with commoners, but nobility absolutely did, particularly 2nd and 3rd sons & daughters that have little or no inheritance. And you call yourself a "genealogist"? I bet you can't trace yours back past the bonobo that fathered your brown madre.
>>538058005nigger all meds are brown, theyre the buffer to keep the kikes imprisoned in the desert and you FAILED.
>>538058005You’re not white if you’re not me
>>538060625Nahhh.You are watching too many Disney movies.We do have very few examples of wealthy merchants arranging marriage for their daughters with impoverished nobles in the 18th and 19th centuries, but before that? It was literally illegal to marry someone from a different caste.I mean, it did happen, nobility exploiting the peasant women, but it is not the kind of thing you can put in your genealogical tree...
>>538060865>illegalUSA didn't even recognize nobility after the revolution, and there were tens of thousands descended from nobility here. Hell, half the USA is descended from Lord Baltimore alone. Are you daft?
>>538058005why are you pretending most americans are italian?
>>538059532kek when people are calling me on BS i always tell them it came to me in a dream.
>>538058005I can trace mine to British Royalty, How does it get to Rome from that? I can trace it back to Russian nobility from British which go to Ruriks which mixed with Byzantine elites, but how does that get to Western Rome? It seems like the paper trail dies there.
>>538060865Royal > Noble > Gentry > Peasant.
>>538058005>Source? I made it up.
>>538058757
