The reproducibility crisis just got PROVEN way WORSE!! Than previously assumed!Most of published ((("""sciecnce"""))) is utter bullshit, stemming from publish or peris for profit research.Check out this case:>math teacher fed up with bullshit>use chatGPT to write made up fake paper>topic is pregant women LOVE prime numbers>publish it>it actually is published in real science journals>get invited to gynocologist conference as a speakerLink:https://youtube.com/shorts/PVjzs9ZFkuU?si=TqL1Kiv5iR7ZIfou
>the Stanford experiment was so heinous that it was never repeated again
>>538058440Never ever link me a short narrated by a söy faggot again you massive tranny nigger.
>>538059150Kysfag just cause a basednigger is talking about it doesnt make it less true fallacyassniggerfaggotjudensau
>>538058440I read some CS paper which said something like:"Our implementation has some flaws in its correctness, but we measured its performance and it is slightly better than the other method we tested against."
>>538059837Which means almost nothing. I have seen anti-aging trials with more concrete data.
>>538059562Idgas dumbass, the fact that it's a söygoy talking about it makes it 150% less worth my time listening to it, you retard clown
>>538058440>>publish itIn a shit publication noone takes serious?>>it actually is published in real science journalsReal technically, but irrelevant, like diploma from india vs oxford.>>get invited to gynocologist conference as a speakerShit conference noone cares about funded by usaid?Real science is very active and glowing as bright as the sun, thats was epsteins main focus, no? Maxwell connections
>>538059916The idea is there is no point in measuring the performance of something if it's incorrect in the first place.>we incorrectly implemented it and we measured it anyway, here are the results
>>538059952Get out of here with your reasonable conjecture. The shills need us to become demoralized so that we doubt all experts in all fields about everything all the time.
>>538058440>gynocologist conferenceThat's it. Wrap it up boys. Just wait for the comet of peace.
>>538060917are you mad that gynecological conferences exist or that this paper was shown there?
>>538060041I've optimized my lying machine to agree with the female perspective 100% of the time.
>>538058440>>538059562
>>538058440>>538058866>>538059150English language already has a word for it, it's called fraud.Niggers and jets and chinks working on their PhD commit fraud to get their degrees.
>>538061409Can't a man just be mad anymore?
>>538060041>The idea is there is no point in measuring the performance of something if it's incorrect in the first place.Depends. Publishing the flawed data can help future studies since its basically a "if your measurements looks like this, here's what you did wrong" which saves times for anyone who might not instantly know what they did wrong and might spend ages troubleshooting.
>i dont understand science>so its all fake>that means the world stays simple for me
>>538058440Technical literature is bloated to hell and back by trash to the point it is impossible to navigate aside from following the publications of a few people you trust. The quality and possible impact of papers have crashed continuously in the last 60 years. There are hardly fondational papers anymore. It has become even worse in the 15 years since pic related, and we're going into loony tunes academia with the LLM adding their own bloat. In my fiueld I know many people that don't bother publishing anymore, or only a short summary paper every couple of years because it's needed to speak at a conference, which you can get away with in fields backed by real industry.
>>538058440Yes, there is a replication crisis in psychology, but psychology is not a real science. It's been a few years since I've done research but the real sciences were always really good at calling out experiments that fail. If your green text is true, then eventually others will publish papers showing that it can't be reproduced. The fact that it was published doesn't mean science is bad, it means that people like you don't understand the process and shouldn't be given access to journals.
OP is retarded and wants to push you into retarded ideologies instead of learning about the world.
>>538064317Lmao, you have no idea how science works do you? If you dont find what your funders want to be found you wont continue to be funded.>>538058440Well duh. 2012 we had a major scandal ~80% of high level papers were irreproducible. We proceeded to change nothing, never talk about it again, and now its even worse…..>>538065673Oh hey you can see the cold fusion paper suppression on the chart!
>>538065700Hahahahahahaha. You have no idea how bad it is in the physical sciences. A study tried to reproduce the top 1000 science and nature papers (highest level journals). More than 80% were irreproducible. This of course was a massive scandal. Yet precisely no changes were made. So professors have only become more emboldened about how to fudge their data.
>turns out everything is fake and gay
>>538066717It's all the chinks and the jeets scamming. Not the only problem but it's a large portion of it.
>>538058440https://youtube.com/shorts/PVjzs9ZFkuUNigger tracking link
>>538065700Simply: it is possible to apply the scientific method to abstractions. Therefore psychology is possibly a "real" science however it boils down to corruption and ultimately TKD is the answer to everything
>>538058440KEK, part of the problem is so much jargon is used, that 99% of people can't even understand what they're saying, so noone can verify it apart from themselves, naturally this means more bullshit and fraud creeps in due to less verification and debate.
>>538058440OP has a bit of a repoductibility crisis if you get what I mean.
>>538069564unironically an actual use case for LLMs is to have it translate jargon.
>>538069937Absolutely that's a great use for it, but it would be even better if we just fucking got rid of it in the first place.
Publish or perish as a concept has to stop.>b-b-b-but we'll just judge people on how many times their papers are citedDoesn't work. Circles of people cite each other's nonsense and you're required to cite certain fraudulent papers in certain fields or you won't get published. It's a giant web of lies.>b-b-b-but we'll just only trust journal x which is an officially approved truthful journal based on journal scoresDoesn't work either. Peer review doesn't exist anymore because no expert is going to janny for (basically) free in current year and even the literal best journals on earth let through multiple obviously fraudulent papers every year because money/ideology. >>538069564Any university study with a false positive result that can't be reproduced independently under the exact conditions stated in the original paper should result in the original university being fined 10x the amount of funding they got to run the study. So much of my field is polluted with absolute nonsense that couldn't even be THEORETICALLY true because x literally can't bind to y and thus can't be measured as stated and yet paper after paper flies through peer review untouched because peer review is done by AI just as papers are written by AI.The only true craftsmanship in science anymore is making fake blots.
>>538071430Cut all government funding for universities and shut down all state universities. It's the only way.If a university can't make a profit then it should go bankrupt. A university which provides no value to anyone and only pumps out endless jargon, academic social circlejerking, and state propaganda will produce no profit, and therefore should be allowed to go bankrupt.
>>538058440>Most of published ((("""sciecnce"""))) is utter bullshitsame with history, medicine, and everything else
>>538059150Based Hans>>538059562Faggot Hans
