How many here can readily admit that their political opinions are highly based on feelings? I have no problem admitting it. While I would never hold an opinion that goes counter to intellect, my core beliefs and ideological foundations are essentially based on feelings. Take how I feel towards my changing country as an example: I feel love and worry for my country and people. I feel humiliation and fear about ethnic Swedes becoming a minority. I feel sorrow and sentimentality when places I remember from my childhood and youth are becoming unrecognizably foreign. These feelings can hardly be overruled by someone arguing from a position of how immigration strengthens the workforce or whatever. In many cases, feelings make up the very ground on which much of my thought sprouts. A new fact or system of thought may change how I feel and thus reason, but it happens very rarely. How people feel should be considered, or societal harmony is at risk. Human beings are not robots, and the state should not attempt to serve us as such, lest we become slaves to the state. We seem drunk on some concentrated potion of enlightened modernity under which the people should not feel, only act, regardless of how compatible their feelings may be with intellect and observed reality. Am I just a massive faggot, or do you agree?
>>538066158you are just the average NPC who is guided by feelings.jews can use propaganda to direct you towards reacting a certain way.this is also called programming, one of the strongest feelings is fear. fearful demoralized people are easier to control.
