>All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.So isn't it technically impossible to overturn birthright citizenship through the supreme court?
>>538066654No.
>>538066720But it says it right there.
>>538066654It would need a majority (at least five justices) to adopt a new interpretation of United States v. Wong Kim Ark and Trump doesn't have the numbers so it's a moot point. Even the three out of nine Justices he appointed haven't been playing ball recently.
>>538066654No and you’re brown. We even had to make a special law entirely to make natives US citizens.You’re never coming here.
>>538066654No, the justices just need to read what the founding fathers said about giving citizenship to illegals. >Why do the children of diplomats born here not qualify for citizenship>Why does that same logic then not apply to illegal invaders?
>>538066720I bet you're a brown person who hates White people but also wants to leech off of White people.
>>538066781Born or naturalized and SUBJECT.....Essentially, if your parents were in the USA legally, you are covered. If your parents were in the country illegally or for diplomatic reasons, you aren't covered. That was the obvious intent and stated intent of the amendment by those who wrote and were questioned about it's meaning.
>>538066654>supreme courtThe Supreme Court makes up the law. It can decide whatever it wants.
>>538066654>>538066781Right now there's no requirement for the parents to be citizens>could be "born by 2 natives, naturalized by 1"
>>538066654Look you don't understand Valve OWES that guy a refund for Artifact
>>538067137>Essentially, if your parents were in the USA legally, you are covered. If your parents were in the country illegally or for diplomatic reasons, you aren't covered. That was the obvious intent and stated intent of the amendment by those who wrote and were questioned about it's meaning.Exactly. The thing here is Roberts is likely to reverse 'it survives as a tax' it. Beyond the bad ruling, itself, I'm worried about the kind of mental gymastics they're going to use to keep birthright citizenship alive and what kind of long legal shadow THAT will cast.
>>538066654So we find out tomorrow if we're having a civil war?
>>538067153> The Supreme Court makes up the law. It can decide whatever it wants.Correct
>>538068711Yeah, parents do not need to be citizens, they just need to be in the country legally. Hilariously, I've had to prove my citizenship SEVERAL times and gotten the stink eye hard when doing so because I was born in Germany because my father was stationed there in the Army and he took the family with him obviously. Because I wasn't born in the USA? I'm automatically assumed to be an illegal alien. Meanwhile Julio Menedez who can't speak English, with a Mexican flag and Mexican gang tattoos is automatically considered a citizen because he says he was born in LA with zero paperwork supporting it.
>>538069098
>>538066654Barron Trump is an anchor baby.
