For wearing yoga pants in public for example?
Unfortunately I think we're past that...straight to the honor killing
>>538069906low IQ antifemitism thread
>>538069906Women should be beaten for no reason just to keep them in line. But if you have a problem with yoga pants you're either a fat woman or a faggot.
>>538069906>dress code violation>like middle schoolThere's going to be enough muslims in NYC to enforce something similar. Go there and start harassing women in skimpy clothing like how the prophet would want it to be.
>>538069906What I would like to see is women dressed immodestly treated as sexual harassment. It fits 100% of the definitions that WOMEN created for this. Using their sexuality blatantly and publicly flaunted to exercise power over vulnerable men is the definition of sexual harassment. Men using their physical and organizational power against women to acquire sex - sexual harassment. Women using their sexuality to acquire physical and organizational power - also sexual harassment. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
>>538069906>>538070226Christianity enforced these same modesty standards until like the 1890s
>>538069906from the catalog i thought the mic was a black thingie..
>>538070281Is it still 1890's now? Are Christians beating women for not wearing clothes the right way?
>>538070278This. If I do the same I am a creepy pervert but if women or girls are flashing panties and their wet, aroused pussies its fine. I can easily tell when most women are attracted to me simply because her nipples get erect and push through the top.
>>538069906sand niggers are wrong about everything... except when it come to keeping holes in line>>538070278you are absolutely correct, anonthe simps and cucks will hate you for speaking the truthbut you're still absolutely right
