[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1776052240233208.png (159 KB, 2074x710)
159 KB PNG
Do NOT cohabitate with women unless you want to lose (at least) half your shit, especially in Canada or the UK.

UK (it's being framed as stopping "violence against women and girls" aka VAWG):
>The government recognises that due to cost of living pressures, financial security is more important than ever and the current outdated system offers unmarried couples who live together limited financial rights if their relationship ends. For example under our plans, individuals could gain access to a share of a house sale to help secure their financial future.
TRANSLATION: A GIRLFRIEND CAN NOW SEIZE YOUR ASSETS TO "SECURE HER FINANCIAL FUTURE" AFTER A BREAKUP

Canada:
>Living common-law means that you are living in a conjugal relationship with a person who is not your married spouse and at least one of the following conditions applies:
>This person has been living with you in a conjugal relationship for at least 12 continuous months
>In this definition, 12 continuous months includes any period you were separated for less than 90 days because of a breakdown in the relationship.
https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/individuals/topics/about-your-tax-return/tax-return/completing-a-tax-return/personal-address-information/marital-status.html
>>
this is a deterrent for relationships
it actually has nothing to do with caring about women's welfare; it is intended to discourage relationships
it's to instill even more distrust between the sexes
>>
File: 1781096774083662.jpg (140 KB, 794x1024)
140 KB JPG
>>538080817
>it's to instill even more distrust between the sexes
Women's behavior is driving all this.
>>
easy fix:
let's say you have 5 million pounds in your bank account and the government blocks it
You find something equal to the value of the blocked amount and nigger destroy it.
Then you start releasing chaos surge.
Finally
>fist rape a copper
>>
>>538080588
I can see this getting extended to simply dating, and really soon. My guess is that they are going to play fast and loose woth that “12 months” definition. You might find yourself getting sued for your belongings after only sleeping with a woman in your home for a few weeks- jewish legal magic tricks might seen those few weeks multiply and suddenly count to a judge as 12 months.
>>
Australia has de facto divorce, so yeah put us on the list. Live with her too long and she can take your shit.
>>
>>538080817
the atomized individual is a better consoomer, he will consoom to attempt to feel meaning. the atomized individual trusts noone and is less likely to join groups who try and change the world somewhat
>>
I remember reading about a pair of bros who decided to get gay married just so they could still live with women and be legally protected from such bullshit

Could be an idea
>>
>>538080904
but this is completely a policy to cater to woman. no courts will ever grand a man alimony, men have original sin in The New Religion
>>
>>538080817
crazy how all they have to do is give women a little power in order to make them unbearable to even be around

strip their rights
>>
You don't even have to co-habitate. There was a case in Canada where a dude got divorce raped even though they lived at separate addresses



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.