[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (34 KB, 592x210)
34 KB PNG
Tell me how even more money entering politics is a good thing, and specifically for republicans?
>>
>>538100868
With the funding spigot for Super PACs left unrestricted, politicians of every stripe can aggrandize themselves (so long as they continue to do everything their financiers demand of them) at a much more impressive scale. Gone are the days when our political elite on either side of the aisle had to worry about going hungry!
>>
>bribing politicians is considered free speech in America
Clown country
>>
>>538100868
Seems good for AIPAC! And that's a good thing!
>>
>>538100868
The Democrats have funding problems, so restricting spending is just a speed limit on Republican activities.
>>
>>538100868
It's good but just not for (You)
>>
>>538101361
The ruling did the opposite of "restricting spending" - it just took restrictions off political spending
>>
>>538100868
Inb4 Soros billions.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.