We live under globohomo, all of us. How do you pretend to boycott the globohomo government you live under?
>>538138660>pretend to boycottI don't eat goyslop or watch goytube or smoke goynip. I may or may not brew/ferment/distill my own alcohol for personal use, should I want any; I don't let others use my vices against me. I stack and put into bonds to collect interest and reinvest it for the future homestead/farm/workshop and don't spend money on retarded shit like partying or other gay shit like shows or festivals.That's the easiest thing to do.Porn is another thing though. The most insidious thing about it is that it's free at the point of use. I need to stop it and leverage the motivation from not fapping towards something smarter.
>>538138660bocchi the sex
globohomo is such a gay term
>>538138660With collapse, comes the freedom of Anarchy and Retribution against your enemies.
>>538138660
Antisocial behavior directed towards nonwhites for example Slashing tires, keying cars, cold clocking nonwhites, tripping women Its free and fairs fair
>>538138660All globohomo has is shitty cultural pieces stolen from other people. They can't even form a military.
>>538138660The only thing we can do is take over globohomo. “Getting rid” of globohomo is not an option. But you can envision a better world easily ie the UN declaring ethnic Europeans indigenous peoples of Europe and functioning as dividing power between Americans British French Russians and Chinese as it was originally supposed to do.
>We live under globohomoWRONG> boycott governmentImpossible because presumption is wrong. I cannot boycott something non-existent. Ironically I would contribute to its claim of existence by specifically boycotting the defined idea.You have a serious flaw of understanding of the system. You can as well say the favela gang system is universal and I must boycott.--> I never gave it legitimacy/never voted for it - thusly I never chose to be represented for it - thusly any legitimacy of power is non-conforming with any legit constitutional derivation of power. Thusly any representative action (regardless if the action is technical legal per constitution) that I was contributing to involuntarily, that does not clearly benefit ME/(YOU), or is neutral(so not detrimental for me,) cannot be consensual. If I have to contribute/pay anything *involuntarily* to fund the process it's thusly non constitutional and thusly i either get an excemption or its unlawful per default. If your "globohomo" therefore affects someone, in terms of taxes, unwanted effects or qn directed Order under threat: Your only job is to decide if you wan to pursue it for bureaucratic error or Treason.If this is not possible, unrestricted violence is permissive until a state of order has been established again where the constitution can be heeded as intended again - if not it is not legitimateViolence is the supreme authority, from which all authority - mainly the constitution was a priori derived from>cont? ?/?
forgot pic
