[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_1542.jpg (65 KB, 750x495)
65 KB JPG
Why is no one talking about SCOTUS expanding lobbying limits

I understand this board doesn’t support the 14th amendment ruling but it seems quite about the other ruling
>>
Bump
>>
This board is mostly shills and gullible retards who happily fall for distraction bait unfortunately. They don't have the capacity to follow and comprehend stuff like this. Definitely another nail in the coffin for the US but they're too busy replying to racebait or woman hate threads
>>
>>538149063
Not getting birthright citizenship is somehow "distraction bait".
>>
>>538149063
lobbying? I don’t have time for your nonsense Consuela is coming to get me



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.