BAN LEADERSHIP
>>538161144Checked. It's very necessary BTW. Meddling with and confining other people for your own gains is unethical and detrimental.
>>538161021How can a society without authority structures enforce the lack of authority structures?
you need a leader to enforce the ban
>>538161448Common consent for basic law, nothing beyond that must be allowed to exist. No power over others. No employment, no landlording, no politburos, no large wealth, no socialism, no capitalism, no communism, no feudalism.I am not kidding. This is the century of ubiquitous doomsday weapons. If leadership continues, humanity goes down the shitter.
>>538161448>But anarchism is not an ideological movement. It is an ideological statement. It says that all people have the capacity for liberty. It says that all anarchists want liberty. And then it is silent. After the pause of that silence, anarchists then mount the stages of their own communities and history and proclaim their, not anarchism’s ideologies - they say how they, how they as anarchists, will make arrangements, describe events, celebrate life and work.>Anarchism is the hammer-idea, smashing the chains. Liberty is what results and, in liberty, everything else is up to the people and their ideologies. It is not up to THE ideology. Anarchism says, in effect, there is no such upper case, dominating ideology.>It says that people who live in liberty make their own histories and their own deals with and within it.https://www.panarchy.org/hess/anarchism.html
>>538161746No you can just kill them.
>>538161746A few volunteers in every settlement and a vote will do.However, we can try having people like Musk and Altman rule over self replicating software and half a billion biotech startups trying to mod the biosphere for shareholder value.
