This is a good point you raise.

Of a man threatens me, and uses my words against me, then dares me to report him,

Should I decapitation strike him and complain about the asbestos tiles at the [place with kids] hes had pointed out to him too, it might cause a huge liability issue later, yet also

>he dared me to complain.

>>538163258
Not everything is bad about christianity just like not everything is bad about homos. They are good people and more likely to be creative in certain instances, kind, et cet.

But yeah that's the thing, cucktianity sounds so sweet, but it is secretly evil.

All these revelations literally had to wait until the end of time/the war between gog and magog to be revealed, otherwise nobody would believe them

>>538163520
Its early forms certanly had value (curiously, only when most Christians couldn't read the Bible),
But the actual Praxis of their philosophy seems to be
>never fight back
>have no in-group preference
>losing is winning actually

I mean, they cope and spam bible verses, or perhaps quotes from dudes that have been dead for centuries, but they can't get around the fact that the actual Praxis of the Bible is unbelievably cucked.
The worst thing that ever happened to Christianity was the 1600s wherein they could actually read the Bible for the first time imo.
I think this is why Christian anons have such a difficult time answering simple questions, and descend into Ad Hominem, or a Purity Spiral.