I think a good way to overturn Trump v. Barbara is for a foreign diplomat in the US to sue to make his child a citizen under the theory that he is "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" which according to the court is synonymous with "subject to the laws of".The court is unlikely to grant citizenship in this case and it will expose how the current ruling is a contradiction in the following way:Premise 1: Those born in the US and subject to its laws are citizens.Premise 2: The children of foreign diplomats are not citizens.Conclusion: The Diplomatic Relations Act of 1978 is a law that is not a law.This is the worst contradiction since "separate but equal is inherently unequal".
Yes, women are retarded
>>538166992It explicitly excludes foreign diplomats though
Scalia 2: Pillow Boogaloo when
>>538166992Diplomats and their kids have diplomatic immunity, so they’re not subject to the laws. You lost again migger
>>538166992Women shouldn't be on the supreme court.
>>538166992The Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves.
>>538166992You lost migger
>>538167123The Naturalization Act of 1795 essentially barred foreigner children from becoming citizens when Wong Kim Ark was decided too. Didn't stop subsequent court's from claiming birthright citizenship existed but nobody talks about the fact that Wong Kim Ark's kid ONLY got citizenship because Ark had been in the USA for the specified time to gain his own citizenship according to the Naturalization Act.
Premise 1: Those born in the US and subject to its laws are citizens.Premise 2: The children of diplomats are not subject to US laws. (See: The Diplomatic Relations Act of 1978)Conclusion: Therefore the children of foreign diplomats are not citizens.
>>538166992You lost hick thats all you need to know
>>538166992I literally know a guy who's parents were diplomats here and he's a US citizen.
>>538166992They have to hyper focus on "subject" to mean everyone ever in custody to justify releasing them into the US. They're nothing but human traffickers
>>538167560>lose job tomorrow>child is now a citizen since parents aren't diplomatsThis is troll logic tier legalism.
>>538168358>This is troll logic tier legalism.The 14th only confers citizenship at birth or naturalization.But yes, if your parent used to be a diplomat, but no longer is, and then you are born in the US, you are a US citizen, like fucking almost everyone else born here.Likewise, if your parent used to be a diplomat, and you naturalize, you are a US citizen, like fucking everyone else that naturalizes.What your parent used to do has fuck all to do with whether or not you can get citizenship.
>>538167731>They're nothing but human traffickersBabies aren't human traffickers. Babies are who is subject to US law. The 14th isn't about the parents.As another example, if we gave diplomatic immunity to diplomats, but not their families, their babies would still be US citizens if they're born here. What matters is the status of the child.
>>538168705>what your parents used to do has fuck all to doYou just cited a law where the parents professional station had an impact on their child's birthright citizenship so no you can't state two contradictory statements. What this means is that birthright citizenship hinges on what us politically convenient by legal interpretation and not by a flat standard. Giving an ex diplomats child citizenship especially from a hostile nation is peak retarded but I shouldn't expect much from Americans.
>>538168826>faggot>obsessed with the childK
They should all be roped...fucking idiots flooding this country with absolute garbage subhuman filth...Do they even go outside?
>>538168826The 14th is about citizenship, specifically for black slaves, not trafficked pregnant women. Libtards will eat this
>>538167123>>538168358>foreigners, aliens, who...theres a comma (,) after aliens.foreigners, aliens, foreign ministers/ambassadors are all excluded.>lost job, is still a foreigner.
>>538166992and suddenly for reasons not well understood by the normies anyway all hell broke loooooose......
https://zb10-7gsop1v78b.bitchute.com/4283Q0MO5619/YOgbuWNonXn3.mp4The Supreme Court are under the laws of the United States Constitution, not above them.
Imagine what could have been https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1782935342186999.mp4
>>538169096>You just cited a law where the parents professional station had an impact on their child's birthright citizenship so no you can't state two contradictory statementsThe parent's professional station doesn't impact their child's birthright citizenship. The law impacts their child's birthright citizenship.If the law said diplomats and their families didn't get diplomatic immunity, their kids would become citizens at birth. If the law said diplomats get diplomatic immunity, but not their families, their kids would not become citizens at birth.It is only because the law says the families of diplomats get diplomatic immunity that their kids get citizenship at birth. The citizenship of the child is dependent on the law, not the job of their parent.
>>538170817>The 14th is about citizenship, specifically for black slavesNah, it was for the kids of Chinese migrant workers.
why would you want to be a citizen of the Epstein Empire anyway?
>>538178595No. That was the lawsuit later on, not the original intent.
>>538166992You lost, just take the L and move on migger.
>>5381669920/10no tail
