But You all niggas do nothing all day beside shitpost and posting a ime girls porn SO what would really changes desu.
>>538175650Or you could just do your job as a parent.
I'm against it because it's a pretext for internet id and eventually a social credit score system.Additionally, it will be incompetently implemented. It will simply fail to do what it's set out to do.
>>538175758We're passed that if the legislation was passed.Now the government has made themselves responsible for stopping your kids from seeing porn.Really legislation commands the creation of software, which has never ever actually worked.
Why are pajeets so ugly and stupid?
>>538175650>oy vey the goy children
>>538175778>and eventually a social credit score systemI thougt You guys we're pro that.
>>538175650Why should we be surveilled like dogs just because some retards refuse to use parental controls for their dysgenic kids?
>>538175650>>538175758>>538175952It's bad when they are exposed to things they shouldn't see, but it's honestly better for little Timmy to see a boob by lying about his age on any given normie site than it will be for him to see one via any of the other means he will pursue when that option is taken away from him. People have grown up just fine without this kind of """safety""" surveillance for 30+ years, we don't need it now. In reality it's not about that anyway, this is nothing but a government power grab given to us by karens screeching and karen simps caving, and it will also benefit the ad sellers (Google, Meta, etc.) who don't want their ads wasted on being shown to AI bots. Basically Patriot Act 2.0 minus the big global event(TM) to justify it.
>>538176200nice id pedoAre you that black skinned? Cannot you see the larger picture and goals? You confuse MIGA for the rest of us who see through the left right dichotomy.
>your car shouldn't have unrestricted access to children>Your stove shouldn't have unrestricted access to children>Your bottle of vodka shouldn't have unrestricted access to children>Your bathtub shouldn't have unrestricted access to children
>>538175778it's set out to identify real users (ai has poisoned the ad economy, they're trying to get ahead of advertisers getting leery about fake traffic) and create another dimension of identifying information that can be correlated into an aggregate tracking mechanism (useful for both the ad economy, and the surveillance state). it's also all about offloading the legal burden of sites like facebook to enact child protection policies, and place that burden on operating systems and other pieces of software.though it says it's about children, it isn't really about them at all. it's just an aggressive expansion of surveillance capitalism + facebook sponsoring favorably legislation that makes them less accountable
>>538175650The smartphone is a Jew in every pocket
>>538175650Oh! lol coomer schizoids that stalk the nsfw boards going to have upload a face scan soon Just lmao Then maybe we can get a glimpse of what you degens really look like when it gets hacked with all your personal info
>>538175778They already made it a law you degenerate retard And it’s being rolled out as we speak Lmao I can’t wait for these faggots to get on one day ready to autisticly spam their decades old porn clips only to be met with face scan age authorization and kill them selves lol
