You're not white if you don’t like cromwell.
>>538204067>UHHH UHHH I GOT SICK AND UH FOUND PURITANISM DURING A FEVER DREAM IT'S TOTALLY NOT DEMONIC AND UH I THINK THE KING DESERVES TO DIE AND ALSO 600K IRISH SHOULD DIE TOO AND UH LETS REOPEN ENGLAND TO JEWERY UHHFuck this nigger
Why?He was a jew loving faggot
>>538204067I was against Cromwell but i chased my family tree back to the English civil war and my direct male ancestor was Cromwell's personal chaplain, kek.
>>538204067Cromwell is a nigger and id spit in his protestant face
>>538204205A single jew from Amsterdam financed 25% of the cost of the "glorious revolution"
>>538204067pic related must have loved him then.
>>538204582He was also a Kabbalisthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menasseh_Ben_Israel>Manoel Dias Soeiro (Dutch: [maːˈnul ˈdijɑ(s) ˈsʋeːroː];[needs Ladino IPA] 1604 – 20 November 1657), better known by his Hebrew name Menasseh or Menashe ben Israel (מנשה בן ישראל),[note 1] was a Jewish scholar, rabbi, kabbalist, writer, diplomat, printer, publisher, and founder of the first Hebrew printing press (named Emeth Meerets Titsmah) in Amsterdam in 1626.
>>538204582Cromwell was not involved in the glorious revolution you ignorant faggots. Cromwell was in the English civil war. The glorious revolution is what puts William of Orange in power.Cromwell did not re-admit the jews into England. He dropped all legislation for it after a pamphlet war was decisively won by the anti-jewish side championed by William Prynne.It was actually Charles II who brought jews back with him after he was restored after the death of Cromwell. Parliament and the merchants guild of London demanded they be removed in keeping with English law, Charles ignored them and kept his pets.William of Orange was heavily financed by Dutch jews as you said.
>>538204204>600k irish deserve to dieFor this alone he deserves praise
>>538205572Subhuman norman kike lover
>>538204067Not a fan of what he did to the Irish.
>>538204067Show flag.Seeing a lot of kikes and pajeets and other retards posting him on social media for some reason.
>>538206085Have you heard of the Portadown massacre? Irish Catholics murdered a bunch of Protestant women and children, all this after siding with Charles and invading England and killing English. The massacre is the event that so enraged the English that they invaded Ireland and brought then to heel.Even then the English were the most disciplined army. There was essentially no raping or looting, and 2 men under Cromwell were hanged when they had been found to have done it.As with the Glorious Revolution being funded by jews, the Irish potato famine had absolutely nothing to do with Cromwell. Cromwell gets associated with these events because ignorant imbeciles hear one thing and then assume they are all connected. They are not.Cromwell is an English Protestant that opposes Popery and considers Charles I a traitor for bringing foreign armies into England and killing English people. The war is known as the English civil war.William of Orange is a Dutch prince who takes over England by marrying James II's daughter Mary, and then ousting James II. James II like Charles I was a Catholic, and English parliament did not want a Catholic leader. This is called the 'Glorious Revolution' and was heavily financed by Dutch jews.The Irish potato famine was the result of people all growing a single variant of potato crop in Ireland. It was down to greedy farmers, many who were Scots, growing only the most profitable crop. When a disease that affects that specifc crop hit, no crops survived. This is why you should have multiple varieties of each crop, to ensure one disease doesn't destroy EVERYTHING.
>>538205445Yes Cromwell set the stage for Jews to pool their money and create the rothschilds.
>>538206908Cromwell was not a jewish puppet, did not re-admit the jews, and was motivated by wanting to defend the English people from foreing armies being brought in by Charles I. Anyone who has actually studied him (and not the stupid ill-researched books by American and 1900s British 'nationalists') knows so much of the common mythos associated with him is pure lies.If you want to argue that he 'set the stage', we could say the same thing about the treacherous Papist kings going against the English people.Cromwell is important to genuine Nationalists because he argued the people constitute the Nation; where Charles aegued HE was the Nation, and therefore his importing of foreign armies and murder of English people could not be treason, because he cannot be a traitor to himself. This was the crux of the argument. Charles I refused he was a traitor for killing the English with foreign armies for 3 days in a row, so eventually we just the traitor's head off.Now everyone knows that the PEOPLE, not the state or the head of state; are the Nation.
>>538204067I like Cromwell but they should've finished the job with Thomas Paine when he came to England to help them completely overthrow their monarchy system after America won its independenceInstead the idiot masochist Brits chased Paine all the way to the docks with pitchforks and torches until he only just barely escaped with his life onboard a ship bound for France
>>538206696Oh dear, none of this conforms with the anti English narrative at all.
>>538204067Fuck off, Protestantism is idiocy plain and simple. It's formula for creating a "purer" Christianity is to strip out more Greco-Roman elements and return the religion to it's semitic roots. The increased emphasis on the Old Testament and the philosemitism that results from it is a uniquely Protestant phenomenon. From early "British Israelism" to modern day backwoods Alabama dumbfucks given their kids names like Jedediah.>But it created wealth.And with the sole exception of Prussia, it primed ever nation foolish enough to adhere to it for Jewish control. What good is wealth if you're too brainbroken by an inferior religious culture to properly guard against foreign parasites?
>>538208005Protestant nations were largely more opposed to jewry than Catholic because of the focus on Scripture which reveals them to be the children of the devil, the synagogue of Satan and the assassins of Christ.Initially jews had wanted to help the Protestants because they thought it better to divide Christendom; but this backfired when they realised Protestants were more zealous and considered them evil.Up until the last decade and a half, you liberals and papists used to mock the religious Protestants of Middle America and England as a bunch of anti-semitic homophobes. From friends in Scandinavia I know religious Protestants were attacked there on the same grounds. We all know about the German Protestants. Now you've changed tack and call us jew lovers. As for banks taking over; the Rothschilds were established not just in London and Frankfurt; but Naples, Vienna, Paris and Spain (can't remember if Barcelona or Madrid) at the same time. It was not just Protestant nations.
Also I just want to say it can be exhausting dealing with Catholic sources because they just flat out omit any inconvenient facts and it leads to people believinv these false narratives, like it only being Protestant nations that got taken over by jewish banks. It's evidently just not true, but people only read Catholic (or jewish) texts these days which just ignore anything inconvenient and make out that it did not happen.And so now we have people blaming the English for things like slavery or international banks. Its exhausting.
