[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1770188066615355.jpg (72 KB, 800x544)
72 KB JPG
Spaniards have a pale skin tone but their faces are dark-featured.
It's the same with MENA Arabs.
Can anyone explain this?

Is this evolutionary adaptation from living in a towel but only face being exposed?
>>
>>538209443
>Southern Europeans have less Northern European features
And yet they are whiter than your average Amerimutt but you Amerimutts dont ask for an explanation for that.
>>
>>538209443
>>538209537
It's the opposite actually.
They have generally white passing features but darker skins
>>
Boring thread, come up with something new
>>
>>538209443
>Spaniards have a pale skin tone but their faces are dark-featured.
Bro stop larping as an hyperborean anglosaxon, you'll still be considered brown in the upcoming global ethnostate
>>
Black people have their "light skin" and "dark skins" they're both blacks because of their facial features, they don't argue about this

Whites are fair skinned or tanned. Why is this so hard to accept?
>>
Either way whether or not meds are considered White should not really matter we're both being invaded by jeets and nigger. Is it really the time to argue about this shit?
>>
>>538209443
>Spaniards have a pale skin tone but their faces are dark-featured.
>Can anyone explain this?
It's an evolutionary adaptation to make the most breedable women on earth.
>>
>>538209443
>their faces are dark-featured.
No
>>
>>538209443
>their faces are dark-featured.
Are you retarded, kike or mudslime?
>>
>>538213805
What he's saying is that we don't have the same cranial features than Nordics, which is true. They consider those traits "dark" because they observe them in swarthier people, us. Those features aren't "dark" for us aince we just consider them normal, and instead we consider different features present in North Africans but not in us as "dark", even if those traits don't directly involve color. To illustrate this point, consider for example that "black" albinos still look "black".
>>
>>538209443
like the sun ?
>>
>>538213911
Read >>538214160
>>
>>538213055
>Whites are fair skinned or tanned. Why is this so hard to accept?
Because Europe was a melting point of global powers for millenia up to 2 centuries ago, global powers tend to argue among themselves a lot while vying for dominance over eachother, to have the population in a constant warlike jingoistic mindset leaders had to fabricate problems with neighbours, who is the "real" white people was one of them and said retarded argument survived to these days, other fabricated problems were "whos the real christian" and "whos the real inheritor of the Roman Empire".
Northern europeans LARP as real superior whites while central and southern europeans are subhumans yet northern european civilizations paled in comparison to ancient Greece, the Roman Empire, medieval France, Golden Age Spain or Victorian England, if they were the real white superior race over the rest then they would be superior always, not just for 1 century.
Also you have a bunch of muttoid USA brainlets with more genetic diversity than indian stray dogs gatekeeping who is white because they believe having 0'01% less negro on their bloodline than fellow muttoids makes them special.
>>
>>538215299
Well said



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.