>>538218033
Because they had a dream
They wanted America to be a place where the white man and the black man and the brown man and yellow man could live in peace and harmony

I'm pretty sure they did, libs just retconned it to make money like every other "progressive advancement" (the point of the civil war was an economic competition between the industrializing commercial north and the plantation agriculture south)

>>538218227
No they didn't.

>>538218227
No they fucking did not indian trash.

>>538218282
If they didn't they would have made that clear the same way Apartheid South Africa did or Nazi Germany did.
They did not do that because they were idealists who wanted America to be truly great and be the distilled spirit of all peoples

>>538218033
They were smart dudes but could never consider a reality where Whites were totally atomized and had zero desire to do what is best for themselves.

>>538218915
I would kill you with my bare hands. SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LIES

>>538218033
They probably didn't think their kids would betray. It always happens. When enough people decide they want to change it than well what are they gonna do? Roll over in their grave?

>>538218914
See >>538218915
And please try and be civil

>>538218998
BLOODY BENCHODE BASTARD BITCH

>>538218033
Declaration of Independence isn't a binding document lol. Why do retards think this? The Constitution which runs back a bunch of shit in the DoI Is the binding document.

>>538218227
god I hate Indians so much. Do people realize this is just the start? Give it a few years and this place will be completely unusable. Just go away, nobody likes you dumb manure munching retards.

>>538219141
I am here for civilized discussion about politics
Not to make friends

>>538218227
Bro they didn't even like other White People and used to chimp out all the time about them. It took George Washington being a Giga Chad and saying, "You are all Americans under my command shut the fuck up and work together you retards.", to hold this country together.

>>538219140
Oops yeah I meant to type constitution instead

>>538218033
they kind of did. it says "we the people of the united states" right there in big letters first thing, and their first rule after creating the government was to declare that only whites could be "we the people" aka citizens.

>>538218259

The Naturalization Act of 1790 was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free white person... of good character".

You can thank Jews and Boomers for changing it.

>>538219271
Yes.
George Washington and his cohorts were like the Brahmins of Early America
They were visionary enough to see that these race and ethnicity based hatreds were Low IQ
And not really conducive to the development of a great nation
This is why they deliberately avoided racially coding America.
And because of this America is thriving today

>>538218998
>h-haha saar p-please be civil and give me your nation o-okay
No. Any expectation of civility ended when shitworlders started invading our nations and turning swaths of it into the shitworld. Extreme violence is the only and inevitable conclusion at this point.

>>538218033
Because it's impossible to define exactly makes a person white

>>538219462
Most Indians Legally immigrate to the USA
They follow the laws and work towards making America Great
I think you are minisformed

>>538219459
>This is why they deliberately avoided racially coding America.
They literally stated in their very first law that only white people could be citizens because they thought you and all other brownworlders were inferior. They wrote prolifically about how the US was a white nation for white people and that foreigners served only to subvert and destroy it.

you are nothing but a lying turdskin subhuman.

Honestly I don't think that anyone back in those days really knew how bad non-whites really are in masses. Except maybe those who lived and worked in the colonies, which wasn't many. Most Europeans probably never saw a single brown person in their entire life

>>538219544
Nobody cares what the jews made legal when they subverted the US immigration system, and those legal documents certainly aren't going to shield you from bullets.

>>538219459
>uses a strange caste based argument to suggest White Americans being replaced and erased is awesome

>>538218033
independence is for white men? is that why we are jew slaves?

>>538218033
>That all men are born equal.
Get fucked your nigger toe licker. Nigger worship was baked into your revolution from Day 1. Your precious rag of script was penned by a nigger fucker who sired a whole lineage of bastard half-breed children. You don't like it? Then you shouldn't have rebelled against your kith and kin over paying your share of the war your hero George Washington started.

The damage is done now. You're stuck with the huddled masses until the heat death of the universe.

>>538219587
There is a difference between a law and the constitution
Some temporary laws were indeed made to place rustic narrow minded dullards
But the foundations for the broad and grand project that was to become modern America
Were already set in place

I only read 3/5ths of this thread.
Try harder niggers.

>>538218033
they blew it

>>538219667
But you will not be replaced.
You will be added on to and the nation enhanced
With the skills and talents of Highly Intelligent groups
Such as for example the Jews, Indian Brahmins etc

>>538219717
>were indeed made to place rustic narrow minded dullards
were indeed made to *placate rustic narrow minded dullards

>>538218033
They did. "To secure the blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our posterity". Posterity there means literal genetic progeny, not the generic "everyone who comes after us and vaguely sort of kind of agrees with us" as modernists try to interpret it.

The Founders didn't fight and bleed and risk death by hanging for high treason so just anybody could come in. They did it for themselves and their children, and no one else. And you can tell this by their use of the word "progeny". That means children. THEIR children, not some dirt baby from India or Africa.

>>538219544
>Legally
Who voted for Hart Celler again? Who in the west voted for INFINITE FUCKING INDIANS? You are invading foreign cultures and demand to be appreciated. What a piece of shit you are, disgusting, dysgenic and painfully low IQ.

>>538219913
>Posterity there means literal genetic progeny
This does not make sense

>>538219682
the people who wrote that line literally kept slaves. they didn't even view shitworlders as human, so why would you be included among the "equally created men"?

>>538219978
It would make sense to you if you weren't a 76 IQ shitworld invader.

>>538219934
The said act was passed by politicians legitimately elected by the people of the United States to represent them
I see no problem here
Again it is not clear to me, exactly how we are invading America
When we are here legally after following the law
And furthermore are mostly law abiding citizens
Complying with the laws of the country they immigrated to

>>538219451
still not part of the constitution.
I'll thank the founding fathers for that.
the US is not and has never been a white christian nation.

>>538219913
the 1790 naturalization act says specifically and exclusively "White men of good character"

File: SCAmpoops.png (313 KB, 482x475)

313 KB PNG

>>538219978
Found the LowIQ brownoid
Herr Durr i don't get it. Fuckoff BhenChod

>>538220320
To allow for their cousins who remained in Europe to come over and join them, yes. Still family, still kin.

>>538218033
they probably didnt expect things to get so pathetic.
Or maybe it was "if it gets that pathetic let it crumble"

>>538220196
>flag
Your opinion on our nation is not required or payed any mind.
Now let ME tell (you) all about YOUR country!
(it's shit, the end)

>>538220505
/pol/ is a place for all people to express their political opinions
No specific invitations are required, I believe

File: indiantrashriver.webm (3.36 MB, 720x480)

3.36 MB WEBM

>>538219544

File: Currypoo.jpg (3 KB, 103x125)

3 KB JPG

>>538220610
StreetShiting is ALL your disgusting ilk know.
BhenChod!

File: 1000020389.jpg (7 KB, 229x250)

7 KB JPG

>>538218033
It was stated multiple times and different places that walking over the border and popping out a baby isn't what birthright citizenship was about
At no time until the modern era did this concept of the magical line that grants babies citizenship if crossed exist. In fact they explicitly stated the exact opposite because of course they did, it would be insane to claim otherwise.
No country in the history of earth has had a policy like they claim America had on illegal immigration. But they expect you to believe that this one country, despite be the most racist place in the world, said they any brownoid can cross the border while pregnant and become a citizen.

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE

>>538220196
>Legitimately elected officials passed the Hart-Cellar act
We could argue on whether they really were "legitimate", but it's unnecessary. We can simply elect more officials "legitimately" to undo that act and kick all you dirty fucks out.

The cool thing about our laws, including our Constitution, is that they can be changed, and God willing, we will change them. No law is written in stone except God's Laws.

Don't bank on the Hart-Cellar act, or the various Naturalization acts, or even amendments to the Constitution. We can just change them, undo them. And we don't need to ask your permission to do so, either.

>>538220196
the legal standards you claim to adhere to were not agreed upon by the people of the united states. they were imposed by jewish foreign influence less than one human lifetime ago. you will die clutching to "but I was here legally" and nobody will mourn for you.

>>538220244
>the US is not and has never been a white christian nation.
it very literally is and has always been a white nation, created by white people for their white ancestors. there are hundreds of years of immigration law to support this. the jewish subversion of the last 60 years does not negate the creation and upholding of america as a white nation for the first near two centuries.

ironically the founding fathers, despite being white supremacists and creating the US as a white nation for the benefit of whites, didn't mind the idea of intelligent, hard working non-white people in very small numbers, but you were never supposed to have citizenship or any legal or political power to subvert or destroy our systems and institutions from within, and because you couldn't just live here peacefully, you had to flood and parasitize the country and turn it to shit garbage, you're ALL going to be expelled or exterminated in the future.

File: 1782936404741316.png (173 KB, 1440x850)

173 KB PNG

>>538219613

In 1934 the Earth's population was 34% white. It is currently about 8% white. That change isn't due to a shrinking white population, it is due to the lightning-paced explosion of shitskin birthrates when we gave them our agricultural and medical technology along with trillions of dollars in foreign aid. Shitskins were less of a problem because there were so many less of them on earth.

File: fuckindia1.png (591 KB, 686x386)

591 KB PNG

>>538220747
>We could argue
can you really argue with something that has like 70 iq points on average though?

>>538220747
That is the prerogative of the American people of course
But I dont think most American people share your opinion
I think they share the enlightened vision of the founding principles of America
That America is a place that should be welcoming to all people that embrace the core values America was founded on

But we shall see what happens in the future
I am betting your white racist horrific narrow minded vision for America does not come true

>>538220800
we need to cut 100% of all aid to brown shitworld nations and put up a kill-on-sight quarantine around their nations for a generation or two to reverse the catastrophic results of these globoshlomo niggerbreeding programs.

If you read their private letters it’s pretty clear they didn’t think giving Jews rights would lead to Jews convincing white men women and browns should become citizens, vote, and hold office. It was literally too retarded to even fathom.

>>538218033
Naturalization act of 1791?

Slavery
Wiping out the natives
Tuskegee
Crack
Cheap Asian railroad labor
The Irish....
Banning Indians after sending them to war
We made the words nigger
Chunky
Good
Nip
Towelhead
Sand nigger
Muzzies
Street shitter

It's been implied for a few hundred years.

>>538220764
They were agreed to by the American people or else
They would have voted in other politicians to repeal said laws
The very fact that they did not, negates your thesis

>>538220925
if you don't think the american people want you gone or dead if you refuse, then you haven't been paying attention to either this thread or the real world. you are vermin. we don't even consider you human. the only way we don't have a problem with you is if you are out of our sight and mind in your own shitworld nations.

in fact, one of the best things the west could do right this instant is cut off the undersea internet cables and all satellite internet to and from your shitworld nations. you don't belong on our internet anymore than you belong in our nations.

>>538220925
>I think they share the enlightened vision of the Founding of America
No, they explicitly do not, and that's the entire problem. You, being an Indian, have no fucking idea what you're talking about if you think our Founders wanted brown people in their country as anything other than slaves.

Here's another cool thing: even though most Americans are retarded, they can have their minds changed, persuaded, propagandized. We can absolutely persuade them to realize that the Founders were racist as all fuck, AND that they were based for being so.

I'll take your bet, you shitstain. Maybe not in our lifetimes, but in 100 years, America will either be White or it won't exist.

>>538218033
hey obviously did, but the jews did a mandela effect on your constitution.
the birthright citizenship also clearly excludes foreigners and aliens. but your government is jews (aliens), they dont acknowledge it.
all history has been manipulated, everybody is brainwashed, all words meaning have been redefined by jews (aliens).

>>538221068
This thread only represents a narrow minority opinion of mostly white racists
This is no way represents the opinions of the vast majority of the American people
Which is why I do not think they will ever vote to create a white ethnostate or some other type of racist hellhole

>>538220925
Stay in Your Lane bhenChod
You exist in America because of Corrupt Politicians the day that ends you bess be heading to India. Free Advice but you to dumb to understand.

>>538221138
Like I stated earlier, if the Founding fathers wanted America to be a white ethnostate or something of the sort
They would have made that explicitly clear in the constitution.
The fact that they did not gives one a clear hint as to the vision they had for America

>>538220196
You dumb-dumb assume democracy is an extension of the will of the people. How utterly infantile. If the system is corrupted and hostile towards its own what does that say about the laws and decisions of said system? Look at my country in 1961 when the Turks flooded our country under a conservative government. Merkel in 2015, nuclear deindustrialization, same conservative party. So tell me again how it was the Democratic will of the conservative voters TO FLOOD OUR HOMOGENOUS COUNTRIES WITH LOW IQ SAVAGES??
Go fuck yourself.

>>538221028
Who are you trying to convince here, yourself? Because your lies are falling on deaf ears.
>um akshually everyone loves us and wants us to invade your nation
The mass global sentiment against you smelly shit-eating rape rats negates your arguments entirely. You lying to yourself and pretending everyone doesn't view you as less than human will not change that fact.

>>538218946
>>538218033
they literally wrote that their laws and systems only worked with a high-IQ white society.

>>538221264
thank you george washingjeet

>>538221216
Hardly.
Is see America moving in a more open and welcoming direction
Trump is nothing more than a white racist distraction
The broader trend of America is clear
As will happen in the soon to happen November mid term elections

>>538218033
they thought it was obvious, who would give rights to farm equipment?

>>538221264
>>538221172
I'm done wasting my time on a delusional shit-eating rape rat like you. You lost, and if you keep pressing the point we're not going to stop at expelling or exterminating your kind from our homes, we're going to glass your entire shitstain of a nation out of existence as well.
I wish you a torturous death, you ignorant golem.

File: Here's your inalienable r(...).jpg (229 KB, 1280x1035)

229 KB JPG

>>538220020
>The people who wrote that line literally kept slaves.
Yeah, we know. They were fucking them to create the first creatura de los Americos and thinking how equal their little mongrel children would be to themselves every time they coomed into their bed-warmers.
The whole fucking point of the war: WE fought to stop weirdo gnostic oligarch slave-owners drunk on Rousseau to protect our people. YOU fought to become what you are today. Eat shit and die. Your republic is the terminal cancer rotting the world from within. America dalenda est.

File: Thomas Jefferson Notes on(...).png (393 KB, 1862x1046)

393 KB PNG

>>538218227
They definitely did not. Thomas Jefferson(who wrote the Declaration) wanted to kick all the blacks out of America. Thomas Jefferson literally wrote pic-related in a book.

>>538221282
I do not know much about German politics, and therefore I cannot comment on that

>>538221364
Interesting post but refutes nothing that I posted

>>538220680
Law is basically just the formalization of the rabbanical judaism that has plagued us for thousands of years.
As such, illogical but superfic “gotchas” can change the meaning of any law to whatever (((lawyers))) and (((judges))) see fit.
The words on the paper don’t matter, because they will lie to your face and tell you it means the opposite, and the rest of the legal system will support it, because this is encoded into their DNA and is how they act.

>>538218033
They foresaw a lot of stuff but didn't anticipate we'd be stupid enough to get subverted by kikes and they'd let them in by the millions.

>>538221519
Politicians are typically double talkers
They say things from time to time to kowtow to poorly educated rural population groups
What really matters is what they put in the constitution

>>538221532
The refutation of your delusional shitjeet whimpering is self-evident in the global hatred of your kind.

>>538218227
no they fucking didn't
they used to think that america was running out of food from rapid expansion back then
they feared the dregs of europe dribbling into the massive landmass and somehow depleting it
they never would have dreamed of a constant torrent of shit coloured turd people flowing into the country some two centuries later
if they had known, there would be a few more amendments in the constitution for sure

>>538221264
What part of "posterity" did you not understand you tard?

Wait, why the fuck am I trying to explain English to a streetshitter?

Ok, how about this: even IF the Founders wanted some globohomo, deracinated shitworld economic zone and not a nation to call their own, like you claim: they were WRONG, and we're going to fix that. It starts by getting rid of brown fucks like yourself. What the Founders wanted or didn't want is irrelevant - they gave us a way to change our Constitution, so we can just repeal the shit amendments and add in new ones.

Stop appealing to what the Founders wanted. They didn't want this shit we have today, and if they did, they were fucking retarded. Regardless, the mess we have is today's problem, not yesterday's.

>>538221618
Impressive rant but not true

File: TIMMY.jpg (3 KB, 117x125)

3 KB JPG

>>538221436
You take our Kindness for Weakness like you and your LOw IQ Nig brethren. Miscalculation on your part, Whites are awake, like i said, the Corrupt are the barrier, remove them and its over for your ILK. Promise

>>538219240
Parasites are not neighbors.
Dravidians are not Man.
Wild Animals are wiser than Hindus.

>>538221692
Alright. Now we wait

>>538218227
>The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free white person(s) ... of good character".
Lmao dumb dalit the US founders literally made citizenship applicable for whites only.

>>538221595
>what really matters is what they put in the constitution
No, what ACTUALLY matters is how we interpret what they put in the constitution. The Constitution is just a piece of paper. We can and will change it to suit our preferences. That is literally what amendments are. We can UNamend it at will. We can even remove the First Amendment and silence you streetshitters, and it would be totally legal.

Appealing to legal documents is a losing strategy, always.

File: Thomas Jefferson - I have(...).jpg (44 KB, 850x400)

44 KB JPG

>>538221595
>Politicians are typically double talkers
Thomas Jefferson wasn't really a politician. He was a revolutionary. It's kind of amazing that he became president since he had zero speaking ability and hated his job.

He was a political radical out to change the world. He effectively started the French Revolution as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ZgmqPZB5k

PS: He also hated corporations and bankers and idolized the Yeoman farmer and more concerned about morality than materialism. He is the exact opposite of what you described.

>>538218033
They couldnt even fathom the horrors we have today. It would be like asking why our laws passed today didnt include Martians and amoebas

>>538221673
I think you are using a very contrived and narrow definition of posterity

>>538218033
Is this about birthright citizenship? Because if it is you're a fucking retard.

>>538221867
That is your opinion and I disagree
He was a politician just like everyone else

>>538219140
The declaration is the ethical foundation. An historian is an inverted prophet just as the professor of law is an inverted moralist, and therefore law itself, in its proper sense, i.e., the doctrine of the right, which we ought to maintain, is inverted ethics in that chapter of it in which the rights are laid down which we ought not to violate. The concept of wrong and its negation, that of right, which is originally ethical, becomes juridical by the transference of the starting-point from the active to the passive side, and thus by inversion.

Still more perverse is the theory that the state is the condition of freedom in the moral sense, and in this way the condition of morality; for freedom lies beyond the phenomenon, and indeed beyond human arrangements. The state is thus instituted under the correct presupposition that pure morality, i.e., right action from moral grounds, is not to be expected; if this were not the case, it would itself be superfluous.

>>538221818
see >>538219717

>>538221794
Impressive, you're the gift that keeps giving and to dumb to understand. You are awaking more Whites to your Ilk with your low iq ranting. like your Nig brethren your actions show truth.\ i'll SEE YOU on the Frontlines. Promise

>>538221855
>what ACTUALLY matters is how we interpret what they put in the constitution
Alright, let us see what future American politics holds
I would bet on a more immigrant friendly politics

>>538221895
And I think you're using a postmodernist interpretation of the word. Can you think of a single reason why a man would risk death by hanging and fight a war against the (then) most powerful nation in the entire world for ANYONE except himself and his own people, his own family?

Revolutions aren't for the entire world to benefit. They never fucking are, unless you're talking about communism, which is just a veneer of global benefit but doesn't actually benefit the people it professes to do so. Our Founders weren't communists. Posterity meant genetic progeny. Yes, it WAS a narrow use of the word. It was supposed to be.

>>538221595
>What really matters is what they put in the constitution
1) The Constitution was written in 1787. The Declaration of Independence was written in 1776. The Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War were the "founders", or "Founding Fathers". The Constitution were the "framers". You are combining two completely different things.

2) The Constitution is not a political document(other than maybe the preamble, which is irrelevant to this discussion). It simply defines the structure of the government. There is of course the fugitive-slave clause and the three-fifths compromise, and the part about now interfering in the slave-trade for 20 years. Which are actually in the constitution.

Not that I would expect an Indian to know anything about the US government or its history.

>>538218033
I don't know if would have done any good even if they had, Goyim seem to be powerless against the chosen people's mind rape.

>>538218033
they basically did through voter limitations.
then women fucked it all up.

>>538221818
Also look into "Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc." By Benjamin Franklin where he openly states that the USA should accept only Englishmen and that "the greatest Number of Englishmen will be on this Side of the Water", thereby increasing the power of England. As Englishmen they would share language, manners, and religion with their countrymen in England, thus extending English civilization and English rule substantially"

>>538222099
Great. I'd bet on civil war, Balkanization, Texas secession and with it most of the midwest, and dead shitskins in the streets. Ireland right now is a preview.

>>538222035
I dont think there are going to be any front lines
I think we are all going to peacefully coexist with each other

>>538218965
Now he's right, that's why he was all up in black pussy. He loved the idea of creating the ultimate mixed American race.

>>538218033
because the idea of niggers being treated as equals to "men" was so preposterous at the time that it didn't even come to mind. do modern day laws make a point of establishing that they don't apply to cockroaches? no.

>>538222203
You people don't even peacefully coexist with each other back in your home dungpile, why the FUCK would you think you could peacefully coexist here? The dirt ain't fucking magic, son.

>>538218033
They did

>>538222099
The sole purpose of moving shitskins to white nations is that the Jew banks act like the color of head and the size of the brainpan doesn't make a difference in securitizing that capit. In the interest of continuing usury at all costs and not keeping The Law of Jubilee.
Imagine being dumped by your nation like China dumps trash on any market they can and still talking back.

>>538222203
You and your Ilk are Hated Throughout the World, and you and your Nig bretern did that on your own. Their WILL never be peace. You are not accepted in White Countries. Question. Who are invading coming on ships to England,Italy, France? White invaders, Right?

>>538220764
>it very literally is and has always been a white nation, created by white people for their white ancestors
not according the numbers and any standing documentation, including the founding documents of the nation.
they were very particular about the rest of the constitution and conveniently left that part vague for a reason.
never was white, will never be white.

>>538222133
Old Benny didn't even like Germans since they were too swarthy for him
>[W]hy should the Palatine Boors be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the Exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.
Why do you think he would want literal shitskins like you getting citizenship?

File: Thomas Jefferson - I hope(...).jpg (67 KB, 850x400)

67 KB JPG

>>538221928
You can have your opinion as much as you want. Thomas Jefferson was a prolific writer. That's the only reason he became relevant. Kind of like a Thomas Paine. Who also went to France to start/join the French Revolution.

As I said, they were revolutionaries. I'm trying to think of a modern or historical parallel. The closest modern example I can think of is maybe Ron Paul. Basically, a Revolutionary is a "true-believer". A politician is just a political whore who wants money and power.

>>538218033
They did. Explicitly. Modern interpretation literally ignores all context surrounding the constitution.

>>538218033
It doesn't mention dogs and cats either, but we don't give those animals any constitutional rights.

>>538222465
>Explicitly
look up what that word means

>>538218033
they were of a type of liberal that I think we could describe now as "primitive". they had many of the same goals and and ideals of capital L liberals today but had not encountered a world that requires a more sophisticated application of these ideas in terms of law and policy. they didn't anticipate even the economy of the mid to late 1800s for this country, let alone now. It's not reasonable to expect them to either to be fair.

They thought they had the levers of power cinched up neatly by tying political participation and eligibility for leadership to property ownership, simple as that. It was seen as a way of producing only leaders in government who were stakeholders in the country, and they would represent the will and interests of other stakeholders. The market could regulate who would make it anywhere in this system, if someone was good enough in the market to jump the curve on the fact that they aren't a white man that may not make them eligible to vote but they couldn't rule out the naive and idealistic notion that this made them meritocratically worth listening to. Too often this had nothing to do with, or even was a detriment, to anyone's eligibility on voting or leading and it caused so much tension right out of the gate that the ability to change the system is what the system relied on to survive, which extended the vote to the populace and the rest is history.

The current crisis is characterized by the system breaking down, there are problems in the system that actually prevent anyone being able to change the system legitimately using the established methods. This could also be described as a death spiral.

>>538218033
Because they were crypto Jews and the USA is a Jewish construct since 1776

File: file.png (134 KB, 787x527)

134 KB PNG

>>538221546
>he thinks "white people" was a concept then
Go read the first Immigration Act you stupid nigger.

>>538218033
They did
>>538218227
Actual retarded engagementbait, hopefully he gets paid to be an ignorant shill

>>538223026
>dude look at these words
still not the constitution. they could have made it part of the constitution if they wanted to but they didn't.
it's a mutt country that tried to give a hand-out to whites and didn't follow through.
congrats, youre a mutt.

>>538218915
>muh idealists
So subversion and calling it progressivism; you like to insert on alot of interpretations rather than be objective for what it was versus where we got with changes added to the original document sue to varying circumstances

We are also not supposed to have central bamking tied to london and the rothschilds, canadas supposed to be able to integrate to the union at a whim, even liberia was founded as a repatriation effort for former slaves
Look how that turned out


People just lack consistency over the span of 3 generations, and the oldest tricks work best for the bloodlines of ancient power and usury

File: file.png (202 KB, 749x682)

202 KB PNG

>>538221618
Non-white people were more-or-less banned from immigrating here until 1965. The only reason blacks were here is because we inherited them from the British Empire. We banned the slave-trade, and pretty much everyone wanted blacks removed from the country for the next 100 years after the American Civil War. The problem was that there was nowhere to send them. We tried to get Britain to let us send them to Central America, and even created a colony in Haiti, and most famously Liberia.

Native-Americans didn't even become US citizens until 1924, and the only reason Chinese were here was as cheap labor to build the railroad. Non-whites were forbidden from owning land in almost every state until somewhat recently. We even had Supreme Court decisions to define what "white" meant because stupid Indians think they're Aryans.

File: founding fathers white na(...).jpg (3.47 MB, 2500x5000)

3.47 MB JPG

>>538223263
It was written in 1790, under the first government of the United States after the constitution was ratified/adopted in 1789. The people claiming "white people" wasn't a thing when the Constitution was written are either retards or liars.

>>538223384
>We tried to get Britain to let us send them to Central America, and even created a colony in Haiti, and most famously Liberia.

why the fuck couldnt we just sail to africa and dump them at the first shore then leave? its INCREDIBLY gay how we were so one foot in one foot out with treating them like property. the islamic world did the smart thing and castrated their slaves

>>538223492
>words words words
>another attempt at whites trying to claim what isn't a white nation
>nothing from the constitution
it would be so easy to refute my point with fewer words if it were in the founding documents of the nation, but it isn't.
it's your hilarious and desperate grasping for straws that just aren't there.

File: Alexander Hamilton immigration.jpg (54 KB, 486x311)

54 KB JPG

>>538223675
Every "founding father" was extremely racist and opposed immigration except from a handful of like-minded countries. The Constitution doesn't really define much of anything. All it really does is create a federal government, enumerate its powers(see Article 1 Section 8), and divide it into three branches with a separation of powers. It's not a political document. The Declaration of Independence is a political document, but not a legal document. Thomas Jefferson's original version of the Declaration of Independence is even more political.

https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/declara/ruffdrft.html

>>538218033
it was the very first act of congress.
they should have made it a constitutional amendment
and now the nation is passed away, and what remains is a carcass called and "economic zone", which is a paradise for cannibals who enjoy [gross] walnut sauce.

>>538222538
But they did explicitly state it. Just not in the constitution itself. They had assumed it was self evident.

>>538218033
Because they were gay liberal Freemasons?

>>538225380
How do we bring this back and how did they manage to topple what was written

File: Sam Huntington Who are we(...).jpg (325 KB, 1762x1343)

325 KB JPG

GOAT Conservative Scholar
Samuel P. Huntington's HOTLY contested yet exhaustively proofed book and seminal thesis "Who Are We?" reestablished the concept of American National Identity and argues that it is under threat, particularly from Hispanic & 3rd world immigration & cultural degradation.
Huntington PROVES that American Identity is NOT based on the American Creed, which includes principles like liberty, equality, and representative government, but rather on a shared Anglo-Protestant cultural foundation.
This foundation includes
1) Democratic Egalitarianism
2) English language
3) Moral Principals based on Protestant Christianity
4) Power of Law and respect for it
5) Value of individualism (INDEPENDENT hard work, SELF; educational improvement, time/money and character management, etc)
6) Dedicated work ethic of industriousness with honesty

Samuel P. Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" is another seminal thesis proposing that cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world.
He argues that future conflicts will occur not between nations, but between different civilizations defined by cultural and religious boundaries.
This idea was first presented in a 1992 lecture and further developed in a 1993 Foreign Affairs article titled "The Clash of Civilizations?".
Huntington later expanded his thesis in a 1996 book titled "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order".
His theory suggests that political leaders will increasingly appeal to cultural identity to mobilize support, leading to potential clashes between civilizations such as Western, Islamic, Hindu, and others.

>>538218033
It didnt need to be said. It was common sense at the time that there were men, women, and animals. And none of them were equal to each other. All were treated differently because different things are different.

File: image.jpg (323 KB, 784x1168)

323 KB JPG

>>538221855
>The Constitution is just a piece of paper. We can and will change it to suit our preferences.

That's treasonous talk. The only way to interpret the Constitution is that the original drafters/signers intended, not what people 250 years later think it ought to mean. If it can mean anything the Supreme Court wants it to mean, then it effectively means nothing. Words have meaning that change over time but the meaning of legal words stays the same (this is lawyer 101, there are common latin phrases in law that mean the same now as they did 1000 years ago).

For instance take the 2nd amendemnt where it says "... a well regulated militia..." Today the word "regulated" commonly means the government overseeing/managing a thing, but in 1828 Webster's dictionary (the earliest dictionary of American English) one of the meanings is "To put in good order" aka working properly, so the 2nd amendment means for the militia to work properly, aka to be equiped and organized properly, which does not infer massive government management but local citizens being properly equipped and trained semi-regularly to have a fighting force that can be called up by the particular State in which it resides, which happened countless times throughout the 18th and 19th centuries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Originalism

>>538221968
A* historian you stupid faggot.

>b-but it says here that

I bet you use CE too

https://youtu.be/oS_jNsMKXaQ?si=in1N-_ZehwHX5XYN
The great melting pot is a term that needs to be mentioned and it's origins

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (591 KB, 1370x2170)

591 KB JPG

USA National Character 1824 01 of 13

>>538218998
You people eat literal shit.

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (721 KB, 1370x2305)

721 KB JPG

>>538229116
USA National Character 1824 02 of 13

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (716 KB, 1370x2170)

716 KB JPG

>>538229191
USA National Character 1824 03 of 13

>>538218033
>white men only.
WHICH ONES ARE THEY EXACTLY?

>>538218033

They knew you would seethe and kill yourself. Smart men.

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (725 KB, 1370x2206)

725 KB JPG

>>538229252
USA National Character 1824 04 of 13

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (725 KB, 1364x2216)

725 KB JPG

>>538229318
USA National Character 1824 05 of 13

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (775 KB, 1370x2246)

775 KB JPG

>>538229391
USA National Character 1824 06 of 13

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (754 KB, 1370x2214)

754 KB JPG

>>538229467
USA National Character 1824 07 of 13

>>538218033
>He thinks it isn't
>He thinks some epicurian meme was about socialism
Whew

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (710 KB, 1370x2205)

710 KB JPG

>>538229534
USA National Character 1824 08 of 13

>>538219459
Kill yourself, you shit-eating faggot.

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (760 KB, 1370x2242)

760 KB JPG

>>538229589
USA National Character 1824 09 of 13

>>538218033
>>538218227
>>538218259
They did. The constitution did say citizenship was for whites.

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (761 KB, 1357x2295)

761 KB JPG

>>538229663
USA National Character 1824 10 of 13

>>538218033
They literally did mention, explicitly, that the rights of for voting and participation in politics, as well as citizenship, were exclusively to be held by naturalized WHITE European men.

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (739 KB, 1298x2243)

739 KB JPG

>>538229717
USA National Character 1824 11 of 13

>>538229691
>>538229740
cite the part of the constitution that explicitly says those words.

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (754 KB, 1305x2239)

754 KB JPG

>>538229775
USA National Character 1824 12 of 13

File: IMG_0319.png (464 KB, 849x720)

464 KB PNG

>>538218033
Skyrim belongs to the nords

File: USA National Character 18(...).jpg (739 KB, 1286x2170)

739 KB JPG

>>538229819
USA National Character 1824 13 of 13

>>538218033
John Adams said that the constitution only works with Christians.

>>538218033

First off they did. Second they also said it would only last for a limited time and we would probably need a revolution every 100 years.

white christkikes will do something similar. ask them where the bible or Christ says that Christianity is strictly a white religion and they'll spam a bunch of other text because they can't find their narrative in either the bible or Christ's words.

File: 1746025193879596.png (481 KB, 1314x752)

481 KB PNG

>>538229116
I appreciate the autism but nobody is reading all that.

TLDR the founding fathers clearly did establish the US as an ethnostate as democracy is only possible in homogeneous civilizations. Something Jews have fought very hard to destroy.

File: IMG_5787.jpg (111 KB, 750x762)

111 KB JPG

>>538218033
Didn’t they?

>>538218033
theyhad the immigration act of 1792 that did

>>538230430
>should we put this in the document that defines the nation's laws? or amend that document to include it?
>nah let's make another one that is much easier to supercede
jews made no effort to destroy a weaker document
the constitution speaks for itself and there's nothing you can do about it.

File: FOUNDERS KNEW SCOURGE OF (...).jpg (100 KB, 450x612)

100 KB JPG

>>538230015
He and all the founders knew Neoliberalism better than mal-educated imbeciles of today.

The De-reasoned degenerated whites of today have no idea of the vast intellectual superiority of those raised from birth on the Trivium and Quadrivium. Let alone literal monkey brained browns demonstrating Dunning Krueger theory with every word they mumble

File: IMG_20260702_123828_952.jpg (80 KB, 400x612)

80 KB JPG

>>538230430
tldr = tlcr in reality

I can read one one of those in less 10 seconds, can't you or low IQ?

Jefferson knew the Jews as all founders did. Same as they knew Catholics, Muslim and Orthodox.

All inferior as nations per based on hierarchical magical authority (East brain disease)

>reads Dred Scott again

>>538218033
They considered it so self-evident that it bore no mentioning.
What a blunder.

>>538222403
But America right now is pretty peaceful compared to some other parts of the planet
Where is the evidence that there is some sort of race war is coming?

>>538218033
It was an assumption that everyone was european and not browns

>>538222451
But Thomas Jefferson fought in elections just like any other politician
And thus would likely have had to do things politicians do such as say things people like to hear

File: REASON FREE THOUGHT v.png.jpg (539 KB, 1239x2146)

539 KB JPG

>>538230777
Tridigit God Squad confirm

Simple axiom sums up every argument against USA and her laws. Explains the envy and strife by every nation and peoples against her. Heard in every Neoliberal complaint.

"Free Thought is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of Logic, Reason and Empiricism, rather than Authority, Tradition, Revelation, or Dogma."

The lack of a deliberately cultivated human faculty of REASON is why browns and women were excluded from participation.

East brain primitivism of civil governance via inferior Subjective Truth through magical; Authority, Dogma, Tradition or Revelation is why all those Eastern religions (Islam, Judaism, Catholicism, Buddhism and Orthodoxy) was rejected as a basis.

Metaphysical superiority isn't debated, it's by measured by the thriving of life in the individuals, families, societies and civilizations the metaphysics builds.

This is WHY the United States of America is uniquely and singularly the greatest nation ever built and needs defending from the uncivilized barbarians within and without.

>>538234644
>The lack of a deliberately cultivated human faculty of REASON is why browns and women were excluded from participation.
There is no scientific evidence for this statement
If there is I would like to see a source

>the only replying to myself phase because I cannot refute other arguments or historical facts
absolutely bodied.

>>538218033
They implied it when they set up the country to where only land owning Whites could vote

File: Black Race Library.jpg (3.7 MB, 1700x6000)

3.7 MB JPG

>>538234711
There is, as well as Axiomatic. But you don't know how to do.

Case in point, your claim declared by fiat is out of ignorance and dogmas.

I doubt you are physically, emotionally or intellectually able to do your own research into the Scientific or Axiomatic Truth on the subject.

But if you are, here's my library on the subject. Includes titles, authors and dates to source on archives or get passed pozzed AI.

Famous nigger agrees though

"To make a contented slave, you must make a thoughtless one. It is necessary to darken his moral and mental vision, and, as far as possible, to annihilate his power of REASON. He must be able to detect no inconsistencies in slavery. The man that takes his earnings, must be able to convince him that he has a perfect right to do so. It must not depend upon mere force; the slave must know no Higher Law than his master’s will. The whole relationship must not only demonstrate, to his mind, its necessity, but its absolute rightfulness. If there be one crevice through which A SINGLE DROP can fall, it will certainly rust off the slave’s chain."- Frederick Douglass

>>538235311
That quote by Frederick Douglass is about slave psychology in general
As regards that list they do not appear to be of a scientific calibre.

File: 1751866556756285.jpg (328 KB, 1197x1368)

328 KB JPG

>>538218033
They did, but they should have repeated themselves to the point of annoyance.

File: 17638482783477237472737.jpg (50 KB, 467x467)

50 KB JPG

>>538224462
IF we went by Founding Fathers definition of who counted as a citizen, 90 percent of pol, including the Whites, would be disqualified

t. Colonial Stock White

>>538235461
Contd

This is what I found from my research
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15641921/

>>538221578
The average American commits 5 felonies a day. We've lived in a police state for years.
It'd be different if they actually pursued violent criminals but they're the only ones they ignore!

>>538218033
They did.

File: Best Biggest Jew Library (...).jpg (3.41 MB, 1700x6000)

3.41 MB JPG

>>538235461
>replies with eternal Pilpulism arguing from authority.

Bad faith.
You're dumb, lazy, disingenuous and/or East brain.

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance, This principle is, Contempt Prior to Examination" Dr Paley

"He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is a folly, and a shame unto him."
Proverbs 28:13

Our terminal impasse reveals itself here.
Leaving no subject or sources undiscussed or uninvestigated as a fundamental idea of Western Civilization, I can NEVER out of hand reject any information based on any added layer of criterion beyond Axiomatic, Scientific rigor.

Tbh it appears the most used criteria for 'Contempt Prior to Examination' currently, is Pilpullian Ad-Hominism logical fallacies.
Veracity is solely determined by specific evidentiary discovery.

According to the American WESTERN tradition, there is no such thing as a "trusted source" blanketed with permanent credibility.
THAT is an Eastern idea, relying more on might = right, than veracity.
ie: Jewish Pilpul is the highest refined model of Subjective, Authority based rhetoric.

Only moment by moment, word by word, idea by idea, act by act analysis confirmed by Axiomatic and Scientific rigor warrants trust.

Trust in the answer, NOT the answerer is always the objective.

And that ONLY for one subject/event/idea at a time. No blankets of terminal credibility can be offered
ie: Missouri is the 'Show Me State'

>>538226071
By engaging in representative democracy, which was done 150+ years ago and saw the loss of your ideals. Sorry, try again.

>>538236210
Those are quotes by people. I am looking for an actual scientific paper like this >>538236044
>arguing from authority.
Which is why i cited scientific research

>>538218033
Why would you want that? Then it wouldn't apply to you

File: 1000020395.jpg (103 KB, 1272x2000)

103 KB JPG

>>538236428
nvm it's three, it's from this famous book

>>538236963
Sorry wrong quote. I meant this post of mine >>538235642 here>>538236428

File: Best Biggest Jew Library (...).jpg (3.54 MB, 1700x6000)

3.54 MB JPG

>>538236428
and denied the libraries full of relevant content of which you femininely insist on knowing nothing.
>picrel

Truth of anything is a labor intensive process. Won't/can't do the labor? Then don't care about the subject.

Truth is not a declaration by fiat from approved sources.

Credibility of Authority claims from approved institutions is an intellectual submissiveness (necessary for socialism/communism as innately feminine) and why you submitted to the retardation of masks and social distancing etc ad-infinitum, and I never did.

File: 1662135083575182.png (410 KB, 1221x1158)

410 KB PNG

>>538221595
supreme court even declared no poos.

>>538218033
They didn't predict that it would ever be maliciously misinterpreted because they never predicted non-americans would reach such positions of power in the first place.

>>538237176
Those are not scientific papers. They are literature yes but not scientific papers

>>538218033
it went without saying, they never imagined it could be interpreted any other way

File: IMG_20260430_173551_110.jpg (623 KB, 2961x1530)

623 KB JPG

>>538237685
How would you know? Read em all?
I have.

>Define scientific papers = endless pilpul
Hence fini, have to power wash the house

Abraham Lincoln on Blacks based on now censored scientific papers, included in library btw.

>"Speaking to a delegation of leaders for freed black slaves: “You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this PHYSICAL difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated.”
Abraham Lincoln

>"I can hardly believe that the South and North can live in peace, unless we can get rid of the negroes … I believe that it would be better to export them all to some fertile country…” Abraham Lincoln

>“If all earthly power were given me, I should not know what to do as to the existing institution. My first impulse would be to free all the slaves and send them to Liberia — to their own native land" - Abraham Lincoln

>>538238489
Because the titles speak for themselves

>>538218033
>>538218259

They actually did. One of the first things the founding fathers did was specify that only "free white people of good moral character" could become Americans. The USA was heavily. The Chinese immigrants they brought in were not allowed to naturalise.
The USA was basically a White Nationalist state, heavily Anglo-Saxonist and eugenicist.

>>538218914
An anon posted a while back evidence of how the American government basically went into an emergency lawfare situation to specifically ban an Indian who had kvetched his way into the US.
>>538218915
The USA had racial segregation laws and the racialist immigration policy was set up the same year as the 13th colony formally joined the union under the constitution, it was also the year of the first census, so this was very much the foundational attitude at the beginning of the USA proper. Not only did the USA make this clear, but, as a racial state, the Nazis took notes from the Americans.

So the USA is very much a special case because of it's racial nationalism, eugenics/quality controlled immigration and it's proto-socialist rejection of class systems and separation of religion and state.
This was a very enormous deal because because it was successful revolution and became a highly successful state but had rejected judaism, did not believe big religion to be an important part of statecraft, and rejected the hyper-elitist class system, declaring that healthy, high quality whites were all they needed.
You could argue that, with the fascist symbolism all over American political buildings and it's intense interest in Rome, that America is a foundationally fascist racial state.

The radical left know this, and their neurological disabilities fail to avoid the contradiction trap in debate of declaring that America is Hitler, while also claiming that it is not Hitler but was actually a very gay retarded state.

It was so obvious at the time it really didn't need to be mentioned. The guy who wrote it literally owned slaves.

>>538221788

This is actually strongly true and really prompts one to reconsider their moral attitudes towards animals like dolphins or macaque monkeys.
Dolphins are known to protect humans in formation from sharks. Yes, in formation. They actually use offensive formations against sharks too. Dolphins also seem to have an awareness of what children are, and several animals actually do seem to know the difference between child and adult and actually change their behaviour accordingly. So you actually see diplomatic and altruistic behaviour from some non-human species.

Macaque monkeys have been noted for intervening in India to prevent the rape of children at the hands of Indian men. As in, the monkeys attacked the rapist.

The Nazis seemed to be highly aware of the superiority of certain animals over certain "humanoids" and really, it does make sense.

>>538238642
I dont disagree that USA had institutional racial policies. I am merely stating that
many of the founding fathers of America saw little value in these petty racial matters
They were more enlightened ideas men - freedom, rights etc
Less race, ethnostate etc
And it think its that original legacy of the founding fathers that makes America great
Rather than just run of the mill common populace racial ideas

>>538237318
THAT'S THE ONE.
>>538237685
applying the scientific method to the subject of homogeneity of legal sentiment of the USA, it is absolutely clear that the USA was intended to be a White Nationalist eugenicist state.
Furthermore the founding fathers were of the very Anglo-Saxonist tradition of the time of being polymathic soldier scientists of high autodidactic capacity, which suited very well and possibly even informed the rugged sentiment of America, putting its trust in race and eugenics and not in class background, submissive appeals to unverifiable authority.

So basically, every serious American was a scientist comfortable with independent research, discussion and debate.
A heavily armed and highly liberated citizen culture thus NEEDED to be highly selective as mental arts are neither understood nor appreciated by imbeciles, requiring then a social policy of violence and fear instillment.
Factually, departing from this standard has flooded the USA with imbeciles who demand censorship and screech rather than debate.

File: IMG_1656.jpg (168 KB, 1000x1000)

168 KB JPG

>>538224462

>>538239914
>the USA was intended to be a White Nationalist eugenicist state
by the people, yes
But not by the founding fathers who were a cut above the common people in terms of intellectual depth
And this is why they did not create an explicit ethnotstate
Because they wanted their creation to achieve greatness one day


In other words most of the founding fathers were better men than the common American people
And they had a grander vision for America than these dullards

>>538239065

The enlightenment specifically led to eugenics and racialism.
Among these enlightened men who made a constitutional point of allowing for weaponry and free speech through which to debate, these guys came to the conclusion seen in their racial and eugenic selection policies.

If they were not racialist, they would have articulated this and implemented it. They didn't. Setting a racial and eugenicist policy was one of the first things they did to make it abundantly clear that the USA was only for people capable of being enlightened and appreciating enlightenment, that being racially White people of good moral character.

The enlightenment and modernity are literally so racist and elitist that the radical left post-modernists had to REJECT modernity and thus science, in order to push new moral standards.
The NeoCons have similarly had to appeal to JUDAISM in order to push their morals.
The enlightened, kind of like advanced learning AI, through application of logic, end up coming to the same conclusions independently, SO CONSISTENTLY that opponents of enlightenment cannot figure out where the "bad influence" is coming from.

>>538239065

You are not human

>>538218033
If they did that free slave labor wouldn't show up

File: ft8acg08xll91.png (597 KB, 3840x2160)

597 KB PNG

>>538218033
I DECLARE THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIDENT
FUCK KIKES
FUCK NIGGERS
FUCK TRANNIES
FUCK JANNIES

>>538240328
The racial policies were merely to placate the rubes and like minded dimwits
Who would otherwise rebel and destroy their glorious creation

File: genocide2.jpg (96 KB, 1024x768)

96 KB JPG

>>538233876
What has been happening to Whites by jews using jew bioweapons such as yourself.

>>538218033
They didn't consider anything other than white men as people, kind of a misstep in hindsight.

>>538218033
because they considered it such an axiom of reality that it didn't need mentioning

>>538240602
There is no genocide of whites in America.
As i said before there is merely an addition of other peoples
Which is hardly genocide

File: 1571649457957.jpg (3.69 MB, 2595x1863)

3.69 MB JPG

>>538240602

File: 1755949505087889.jpg (236 KB, 1062x1262)

236 KB JPG

>>538239065
tl;dr
hindus cannot be American.

File: 1571649532891.jpg (3.78 MB, 2595x1863)

3.78 MB JPG

>>538240749
Is.

File: 1571649562282.jpg (3.6 MB, 2595x1863)

3.6 MB JPG

>>538240814

File: 1571649646890.jpg (3.55 MB, 2600x1863)

3.55 MB JPG

>>538240850

File: 1571649677576.jpg (3.57 MB, 2600x1863)

3.57 MB JPG

>>538240910

>>538240528
youre a moron they absolutely despised other races, the radicals that kicked off the civil war were a subsect of necrophiliac feminists that were used by the establishment. jefferson said blacks were inferior in appearance and intellect

File: 1782066356394940.jpg (165 KB, 925x649)

165 KB JPG

>>538240749
>There is no genocide of whites
SAAAARRRRRR

File: 1571649722549.jpg (3.57 MB, 2597x1859)

3.57 MB JPG

>>538240942

>>538240944
negrophiliac*

File: 1571649769711.jpg (2.25 MB, 1950x1860)

2.25 MB JPG

>>538240990

>>538240944
If they did, why did they not mandate a white ethnostate like Apartheid South Africa did?

File: 6krsxk4cl6l71.png (1.07 MB, 4592x3196)

1.07 MB PNG

>>538218033
Because they had an autistically narrow definition of what a white person is.

File: 1717775082400800.png (289 KB, 1250x833)

289 KB PNG

>>538241034

File: 1722729396979462.jpg (142 KB, 1093x1200)

142 KB JPG

>>538241123

>>538218282
They literally did. Your faggot founding fathers loved jews and talked about them being civilisation builders and geniuses. America was always intended to be the globohomo hegemon with mystery meat mutt garbage from all over the world partaking in the "American Identity" under the "American Project." It's shocking how there wasn't one faggot among your faggot founding fathers to veto the decision to bring black slaves into American society, the biggest millstone around yank necks even today. Retarded society founded by retarded Anglo bluebloods killing their own kin over money disputes. You deserve everything happening to you now, nigger.

File: 1634839086453.jpg (106 KB, 880x785)

106 KB JPG

>>538241151

>>538241116
Nordics swarthy?
why

File: 1752957147307108.jpg (141 KB, 763x735)

141 KB JPG

>>538240522
Based

>>538241191
You wouldn't get it.

>>538241191
Because "white" originally only applied to English people and only expanded due to the WASP elite needing to cope with becoming a minority due to the Germans, Irish, and Italians immigrating
As far as the founders are concerned America stopped being white in the 1900s, which is why I find it funny that you have so many descendants of the above regurgitating their opinions as if they weren't viewed on the same level as the Spanish