Why are females almost completely useless? And, more importantly, why shouldn't they be considered subhuman? Physically, they're pathetic. And, per the developmental theory (as advanced by Paul Irwing and Richard Lynn), females are also significantly less intelligent than males. Men have done more to advance humanity than women ever could. Females can't even survive in nature without males providing everything for them. Technology will likely allow us to reproduce without women within the next few decades. Why shouldn't female subhumans be eradicated?
>>538236252>Why are females almost completely useless?Men understand.Women want answers.
>>538236341I'd commit suicide if I were female.
>>538236395>I'd commit suicide if I were female.But if you were a female your ego wouldn't let you. This is why the FtM troons just detransition instead of ropeing themselves: Their level of self-delusion wouldn't allow it.
>>538236252>Men have done more to advance humanity than women ever couldwithout pussy there is no humanity and pussy is the most important resource in the world. unfortunately dicks are useless.>Technology will likely allow us to reproduce without women within the next few decades.this would only create mentally ill freaks, humans need mothers.
>>538236534All the more reason to gas them.
>>538236577>humans need mothersDo they, though? Everyone seems to think that fathers are far more important nowadays.
>>538236695>Do they, though?yes, otherwise you cant become a chad.
>>538236721The only way to "become a chad" is to sever all ties with the inferior subhumans that we call women.
>>538236252I'm old enough to have raised a child who's grown and helped others co-parent, not to mention just knowing women and dating them my whole life. About 15-20% are relatively intelligent and emotionally mature enough to actually work with toward a goal. The other 80% should be recognized as a substandard class of human. Morally, though, at most 30% of women are trustworthy in a crisis. The rest are either openly rotten (which is pretty common) to fold, morally, with any kind of incentive or pressure. I came to these conclusions after almost two decades in healthcare. A female P.A. might be trustworthy but no nurses and below are. If you think they are, go lookup your state's Board of Nursing and read the results of investigations they've concluded.
Your argument rests on several unsupported leaps in logic.First, even if men are, on average, physically stronger, physical strength is not a measure of human worth. If it were, children, the elderly, and many men would also be "subhuman," which is clearly absurd.Second, citing Paul Irwing and Richard Lynn does not settle the intelligence question. Their conclusions remain controversial, and the broader psychometric literature finds that average sex differences in general intelligence are small, with substantial overlap between male and female populations. More importantly, average group differences tell us nothing about the value or abilities of any individual.Third, pointing to men's greater historical achievements ignores a crucial variable: opportunity. For most of history, women were excluded from higher education, science, politics, and property ownership. You cannot fairly compare outcomes when one group was systematically prevented from participating.Finally, your conclusion does not follow from your premises. Even if future technology made reproduction possible without women, that would no more justify exterminating women than automation justifies exterminating manual workers. Replacing a biological or economic function does not diminish someone's humanity.In short, your argument confuses average biological differences with moral worth, selectively cites disputed research, ignores historical context, and ultimately commits a non sequitur: none of your premises logically support the conclusion that women are "subhuman" or should be eradicated.
>>538237192So, do you agree that women should be killed off?
>>538237440AI-generated response. Idiot.
>>538236252op is a faggot or incel kek
>>538238924
>>538236577Actually, intelligence is the most important resource. Thanks to females, it's quite scarce.
>>538236252
>>538239730Name one flaw in my post.
>>538239678Right. Reproduction happens all around you. Bugs are fucking, the little cells on your eyelashes are multiplying, etc.Reproduction really isn't that special. It's literally commonplace as hell. If mother humans don't exist, then whatever species that isn't as retarded as humans would be mothering and the circle of life would continue. Just without any intelligence. Just base animalism.
Hoes mad in this thread
>>538236252females are meant to be pregnant or lactating most of the time and not much else. that is what nature intended. it's why they are unhappy with anything now.
>>538240561>females are meant to be pregnant or lactating most of the time and not much else.That sounds like a fate worse than death. Killing them off would be merciful.
>>538236534>Braith
females are very very useful for setting you up with their friends.i don't expect you to know that, though.
>>538240679Okay, mosche.
>>538241238Irrelevant. Your obsession with carnal pleasure means that the truth will always be hidden from your view.
>>538236860>no mother>no fresh milk from the tit>cant grow tall>remain manlet>become loser>never even learn how to socialize with womanyes without a good mom you cant become a chad.>>538239678without breastmilk from your mom when you are a baby you cant grow smart.as someone who grew up on goyslop and has a deformed manlet body (which is not desired by any woman) you should be aware of this.
>>538241360>the truthwhat truth?why would anyone want to become a loser like you?
>>538239888wasnt arguing with you ya fucking tard
>>538241818My bad. I thought that you were using the image of the woman with the sign to imply that there's "too much wrong" with my post to warrant a detailed response.
>>538236252Actual graph looks more like this. Women test like 4 points lower on IQ, as well as having a narrower distribution.So if that's the case, why do they succeed better in some formats?This is something I've brought up.with regard to asians too. Part of what helps you succeed in real world society isn't just IQ, but your obedience stat. Your ability to follow directions, do what you're told, be a cog in the machine. Women and asians succeed because they have a higher obedience stat, they're more reliable for an employer a lot of times.
>>538241763The truth about female subhumanity. Also, hating females and personal success are probably correlated.
>>538242060What about Jews, though? They don't strike me as naturally obedient.
>>538242195>and personal success are probably correlated.then why are you a loser?looks like you are the subhuman.
>>538241731Uncorrelated, cargo cult idolater.
>>538242289I must be unsuccessful because I tell the truth about women. Because you just magically know that I'm a failure.
>>538242315its the reason why you are a manlet with little success in society.>>538242383>Because you just magically know that I'm a failure.its really not that difficult to figure out.successfull men arent whining on imageboards.so you are 100% some sort of deformed ugly manlet.
>>538241731Tits are disgusting.
>>538242502>Tits are disgusting.yes, but cunt is worse. imagine that fish smell
>>538242286Are you sure? They have lower testosterone right? In that case I think it's just higher IQ and in-group networking.
>>538242502>manlet>homosexual>retarded>mentally illkek a real success you are!
>>538242566>imagine that fish smellI don't have to.
>>538242620>manletI'm around 6 feet tall.>homosexualHating women =/= lust for men.>retardedIf I were mentally retarded, then I wouldn't be capable of writing full sentences.>mentally illNo, I'm perfectly sane.
>>538242887>I'm around 6 feet tall.prove it little guy.>Hating women =/= lust for men.is that how you cope with your homosexuality?>If I were mentally retardedyou clearly suffer from some mental retardation.
>>538238924Both. Couldn't experience a touch of woman so became a bitter tranny getting fucked by other men
>>538242620I'm 6'5", have 130 on the FSIQ and I agree with him. You type like you're mentally disabled.
>>538236252Women have lower average IQs. That graph on the book cover must be wrong.
>>538243115>manlet coping this hardkek
>>538242971>prove it little guy.By providing pictures of myself? I'd prefer to stay anonymous.>is that how you cope with your homosexuality?Definitely not homosexual. I used to obsess over tits in my teenage years, but now I realize that they're nothing but disgusting sacks of fat that serve no practical purpose.>you clearly suffer from some mental retardation.Because I have unpopular views on women?
>>538236252It's precisely because that feminism was created by the Jew.Without simpery is just impossible to control a modern men.
>>538243196It's not a real graph. It's just a cover illustrating a general truth (i.e. that men are more likely to be extremely intelligent and extremely stupid).
>>538243239>manlet cant prove itof course because you are a manlet. also most likely brown skinned subhuman too.>Definitely not homosexual.you talk like a homo and you have homosexual views.>Because I have unpopular views on women?clearly your brain never finished its development and this made you permanently retarded and gave you mental illness.many such cases.
>>538236534Oof, nothing destroys a person like leftism. Fuck even dying in a car crash is less appalling because it doesn't turn the victim into a depressed weirdo frankenstein first.
>>538237192>Morally, though, at most 30% of women are trustworthy in a crisis.You're being very generous here.I'd say 10% at best and even in those cases, only because at the moment their emotions can ironically drive them to do the right thing. It's not because they "decided" to do. They just acted on a correct impulse.
>>538243341That may be so, but it also illustrates a common lie: That women and men have the same IQ median.
FOIDSLOP THREAD
>>538236252>Why shouldn't female subhumans be eradicated?Literally no reason, anon. For humanity to step into the future, for us to evolve and ascend, we must shed the foid albatross holding us back.
>>538243496The book argues for the opposite conclusion. It says that men are smarter on average. I agree that the cover is somewhat misleading, though.
>>538236252it will never change because theres too many simp bitches from the easy old times who still believe in their santa clause trad fantasies will materialize in this new world with the right laws while technology says the opposite. they are just as onions riddened as the bitches from reddit that they make fun of and they dont even realize it. its no longer the male rights movement, it is now the male separatist movement where technology must be created to render females completely redundant and thus empower the true species that progresses society forward which is men. women's empowerment has done nothing but stagnated everything but like i said, it will never happen because theres too many simp bicthes here, on reddit etc etc who have all their santa clause fantasies
>>538243639"Santa clause"?
>>538236577Kids raised in single-father homes turn out better. Kids raised by single mothers are always highly damaged, delusional, dope-heads, criminals or trannies. You’re a woman coping.
>>538243770Exactly. Isn't that pathetic? Women's only role throughout history has been raising children. And they can't even do that right.
>>538241731Nephew never had breast milk, is 6’0 at 14 years old and always been top of his class. You’re coping hard.
>>538243925You are delusional
>>538243639For most people the choice is between simping or celibacy. They cannot conceive a middle-ground. Honestly I prefer celibacy (including no masturbation) because I came to the conclusion that 99% of the evils in my life come from or because sex so the less I have of it the better.But this thought just TERRORIZES women because they know if men give up their sexual instincts bitches lose ALL their power, because the only shit they can offer to level the field is their pussy and they know it.
>>538243770Kids need both, a mother and a father.one alone cant get the job done my malnutrition manlet friend.
>>538243956>You are delusionalProve it.
>>538243926dont even bother, you are talking with the neo-so-y boys who are arguing for this arbitrary notion of "natural" in an air conditioned LED lighted modern room. hopefully their be sent to the trenches in the 3rd world war so the trash can be taken out
>>538243926>things that never happenedany more manlet fantasies?
>>538243341Because more males tend to be poor and malnourished etc. >>538242060It’s socialization. Women are very social, but not just that, everyone treats them nicely and tries to baby the, while they treat men/boys like shit (just look at how female teachers are mistreating and purposely sabotaging boys in school).
>>538244023its the only solution and past the great filter which they are the bottle neck to everything because they havent evolved at all yet control reproduction. technology has to do to them what it did to men and worst
>>538244100Would love to just round all 4 billion females up, send them all to Antarctica, and watch them starve to death.
>>538244175Though, the hypothermia would probably kill them before the starvation does. Females always complain about being cold.
>>538244152Truly hope you're right, fren.
>>538244100But you agree that females should be annihilated?
>>538244024No. Kids are better without mothers.
'ate le foids>:)
>>538236252they aren'tsomeone needs to give birth to (You) and life - unfortunately for (You) - cannot come from gay anal sexjust because mommy didn't love you doesn't mean that the other sex contributes nothing
>>538248493So, you admit that they're only tools for reproduction?
>>538237440
>>538242971>>Hating women =/= lust for men.>is that how you cope with your homosexualitthe proper word for this is aromantic heterosexual, e.g you dislike the opposite sex and don't want romance but will still fuck them
>>538242060>>538242286>>538242587women are higher in the traits agreeableness and neuroticism. this holds across all demographics of women.these are items on the 5 factor personality model. this basically means they're crazy and do what they're told to fit in.
>>538236534It's almost as if the inclination to tell every man to fuck off for being interested in her is correlated with being a DYKE FAGGOT
>>538243210fuck you i'm 3'8" and 523 lbs and i'll roll myself into your doorway and get stuckthen what faggot
>>538249339>you dislike the opposite sex and don't want romance but will still fuck themStill wouldn't fuck them.
>>538249644thats aromantoc asexual (aroace) then
>>538249780I mean that in the sense that I still WANT to fuck them, but just wouldn't even if I had the opportunity.
>>538242060>obey Just be a good goy and you will succeed
>>538236252I mean desu it's quite obvious, in my everyday interactions with women i can physically tell they're dumber and it doesn't bother me, I get it.
>>538250110Why would you want to dedicate your life to loving and fucking a subhuman?
>>538244024
Question for you all: would you blame a women for becoming conscious of her own subhumanity and committing suicide because of it?
>>538243466>>Morally, though, at most 30% of women are trustworthy in a crisis.>You're being very generous here.>I'd say 10% at best and even in those cases, only because at the moment their emotions can ironically drive them to do the right thing. It's not because they "decided" to do.Oh look someone is subtly claiming women aren't responsible for their actions. They actually DO decide to do everything they do. Stop letting them off the hook.
>>538250929*a woman
>>538250929Yes because all she had to do was get over herself and there's probably a thousand men within her vicinity. That would be more than willing to protect her and give her advice. Even if it's just to get in their pants they would still give her proper good advice, and then she could just friends zone them afterwards.
>>538251011You seem to misunderstand me. I'm asking if you think that women who recognize their own worthlessness should kill themselves. Like I said before, I would kill myself if I were born female.
>>538237440>clearly absurdNo it’s not. Children have fewer rights than adults and the elderly are valued for their wisdom and past proven achievements.AI is terrible at “reasonable” logic.
>>538251106It's not what you said you fucking retarded get the fuck out of here
>>538251231You said that she should have found a man to protect her and give her advice. Protect her from what? No amount of advice can elevate a woman's condition, because she is biologically inferior.
>>538251318No, I don't think women should kill themselves if they realize they are inferior at certain things. It was normally not a problem because men would just physically control women.in the past and everyone was happier
>>538251430>inferior at certain thingsInferior at everything.
There isn't anything about being a woman that helps humanity or civilization. Every woman's success is in spite of her biological disadvantages. Conversely, every successful man was probably given an advantage because of his biology.
>>538242060The people at the top are all men, and men make life easier for women because they love them. Put women at the top and watch the average woman suddenly have worse outcomes than a trans person in Sudan.
>>538253640>men make life easier for women because they love them.Why? Women are essentially a retrograde form of humanity.
>>538242060If you look at this graph closely, the average IQ for men is pretty much the ideal for reproduction because it is the highest IQ where the ratios are 1 to 1 so finding an IQ match to establish a long term bond with will be easy. Meanwhile a 135 IQ dude has to deal with a 5 to 1 ratio and anything beyond that point means you're pretty much never going to find a match and will have to settle for someone you'll have tons of friction with. So it makes sense that the average continues being around that area instead of increasing like other traits like height have done over time even though IQ is supposed to be an attractive trait that also has correlation with better economic outcomes to some extent.
