With the countless examples of companies losing money by going woke, WHY has there yet to be an instance of shareholders SUING the FREAKING company???
>>538253357I’m gay and fat
Praise Bob!
>>538253357Because woke is always the most risk-averse option so it's always theoretically a correct choice.
>>538253357migger republican "anti-woke" faggots love "woke" companies lmao. at the peak of "anti-woke" retard shit, i saw migger bumperstickers right next to some faggot ass "baby yoda" sticker. they love woke companies like disney and marvel.
>>538253357>With the countless examples of companies losing money by going woke, WHY has there yet to be an instance of shareholders SUING the FREAKING company???Well the "legal system" is corrupt AF for one, and purely Socialist and Feminist now.
>>538253630Cringe neckbeard. Kill yourself, faggot.
>>538253357because most people are invested in etfs not direct stocks and those etfs are run by the jews at blackrock, statestreet, and vanguard, who are the jews behind pushing woke.
>>538253570But how many demonstrations do we have of woke movies that have BOMBED.Wouldn't that be enough for a solid case against a board?
>>538253357ESG infinite fiat money as a 'loan' goes to the company and pays off the shareholders until dissolution of the company only then do they realize there is a problem but it's too late.
Like 30 states AGs are suing Disney for woke, you can read all about it OP. Disney fucked up and admitted they were doing wokeness even though it hurt their bottom line, on camera! LOL