>be congress>vote to limit birthright citizenship to permeant legal residents of America>add: this law exists outside the jurisdiction of the federal courtsthere, I fixed it. Supreme Court can't touch it Congress can limit the Supreme Court's ability to review laws.(of course they won't do that since 99% of congress hate white people)
>>538304051>be senate>refuse to vote in favor of calling the President His Majesty
If one thinks about it logically, Adams was a shit president and had Jefferson been the VP first, could have curtailed presidential powers and made the legislative more powerful.
>>add: this law exists outside the jurisdiction of the federal courtsPretty sure they can't do that because it's courts that actually adjudicate legal disputes.If congress wants scotus to fuck off and not touch something it needs to be a constitutional amendment.
>>538304124>refuse to vote in favor of calling the President His MajestyI like Adams but that was a weird thing for him to push.I wish the show had an entire episode where Franklin and Adams had to share a hotel room and they argued about keeping the window open the entire night.
>>538304352its called Jurisdiction stripping Congress can do it anytime it wants besides "cases between states" which is the supreme court's actual job.
>>538304593He was a fat vain retard stuck in the old ways. His idea of overthrowing tyranny was to install their own version of tyranny, that being an all powerful president.
>>538304051>to limit birthright citizenship to permeant legal residentsit is not necessary for Congress to Pass any legislation. https://write.as/q1jc2dzd56xhp.mdIn the Motion for Re-Hearing, the upgraded argument is"the Executive Order was an express declaration of the sovereign's intent that jurisdiction shall not be applied over a specific class of aliens at the moment of their birth." https://write.as/q1jc2dzd56xhp.mdBut the Decision's assertions about "three narrow exceptions" is overbroad and will interfere with the President's subsequent attempts to prevent US citizenship from attaching to illegal aliens and tourists etc.ReHEARING FRAMING THE EXECUTIVE ORDER AS AN IMPERFECT EXPRESS WAIVER OF JURISDICTIONThis detailed legal specifications 3-4 (Article 1, of the Articles of Impeachment) present a sophisticated argument centered on the distinction between express and implied waivers of sovereign jurisdiction. By analyzing Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon (1812) [2] alongside United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) [1], this argument identifies a critical legal distinction that can be used to challenge the majority's reasoning in Trump v. Barbara (2026).If integrated into a Petition for Rehearing or a Brief on the Merits in subsequent litigation, this “Express Waiver” argument would be structured around three primary legal pillars.Pillar 1: The Failure to Distinguish Between “Express” and “Implied” Sovereign ConsentIn Schooner Exchange, Chief Justice John Marshall established that while a nation’s territorial jurisdiction is “absolute and exclusive,” the sovereign may consent to waive or exempt certain alien classes from this jurisdiction [2]. Crucially, Marshall held that “This consent may be either express or implied” [2].A legal brief seeking a rehearing ...https://write.as/q1jc2dzd56xhp.md
>>538304685Oh, didn't know about that. They should do that for all immigration cases. It would make mass deportations WAY faster (Congress won't because they're faggots who want illegals anyway)
>>538304051>add: this law exists outside the jurisdiction of the federal courtsYES MORON, that's how actual Legislative law works. Congress passes it, courts enforce it.Your pants shitting retard is getting nothing through Congress except more deficit spending, gibs for the rich, and a bill for Operation Epstein Fury.Deal with it.
>>538304855Better than the board of directors tyranny we had before. Now we have that again, and we want the king back.