lets that sink in
>>538339696What about the war war?
>>538339696Because ships aren't necessarily the best counter to other ships?Do you think airplanes are shot down by other airplanes as well?
>>538339758so what are ships usefull then? why even have them there when they are only targets?
4chanX is compromised
>>538339877Long-range bombardments of land targets. Also as staging areas.
>>538339696They didn't really want that fleet.
>>538339696This is the ONE.....
>>538339750
>>538339696is that the chart of 'ships that maybe we hit when docked and could have taken some damage'?
>>538339696Losing a navy means you're winning
>>538339696except uk france and usa have navies fucking moron
>>538342196You gotta let it go...
Only 1 significant ship was sunk. The 2 other ships sunk was a landing craft and a minesweeper. Thats it. Other ships were hit but not sunk. So they pulled out thier ships. Just like the US did in Iran because thats todays fype of warfare.The Black Sea is still full.of Russian subs that can destroy anything they want at anytime.>Underwater doesnt count!Stupid nafo troon
>>538339696Happens with best of us(USA) who lost sea war against fucking Iran, unable to control the strait despite having 11 nuclear air carriers.
>>538339696Now let's not pretend Ukraine did that on it's own that's BULLSHIT...That being said...It is very berry impressive indeed.Honestly I am really surprised Russia has taken such an ass fucking without just nuking shit.One really wonders if they have actually no functional nukes left perhaps it all old fucked shit. If so Russia could seriously lose this war as nuts as that sounds
>>538342196there are at least 3 symbols /, // , X , X/. not everyone got destroyed just check the moskva symbol X, those were sunk, other symbols surely represent light and heavy damage or other degrees of destruction
>>538344012ah, thanksyou know, I still am skeptical that the Moskva was sunk, rather than it suffering a catastrophic fire.
>>538343763you can't just go nuclear, that's mad
>NATO doesn't have a navyPlease, do go on. And leave out the drones changing warfare forever part.
>>538346129>I still am skeptical that the Moskva was sunk, rather than it suffering a catastrophic fireIt was hit by a Ukrainian built Neptune missiles, which caused a catastrophic fire before it sank.
>>538348708yeah, I know that's the narrative, but I'm skeptical.
>>538348770>but I'm skepticalThen you're an idiot.
>>538340032>leepicredditor.giftopfugginkek
