Why are females almost completely useless? And, more importantly, why shouldn't they be considered subhuman? Physically, they're pathetic. And, per the developmental theory (as advanced by Paul Irwing and Richard Lynn), females are also significantly less intelligent than males. Men have done more to advance humanity than women ever could. Females can't even survive in nature without males providing everything for them. Technology will likely allow us to reproduce without women within the next few decades. Why shouldn't female subhumans be eradicated? Oh, and I don't give a fuck about sex being gone for good. The world would be so much better if males weren't so fixated on sex.
>>538363220Your thread is highly political because it uses a historically derogatory generalization to demean an entire gender. It echoes systemic misogyny and hate speech, seeking to justify gender-based discrimination and dismantle equality movements by challenging women's societal value.
>>538363451AI-generated response. Idiot.
>>538363220>Men have done more to advance humanity than women ever couldOkay but they thanked their mum when they did it.
>>538363451Fuck off bot.
>>538364517>>538363751you aren't calling me wrong
>>538364552The Truth is misogynistic and racist. Now show your tits or gtfo you retard.
>>538363220Who cares about IQ every women on the planet could have 300 IQ and get mogged by retard IQ male in competency.
>>538363451But calling something "political" doesn't make it false, and calling something "hate speech" doesn't refute its claims.
>>538364682I'm not a woman. You're making me feel uncomfortable!
>>538364834I'm not here to dispute any claims I am here to bonafide this thread as political. Next time I will try to apply an alt-right slant.
>>538364839Then fuck off somewhere else.
