[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Downsizing.0.jpg (216 KB, 1200x800)
216 KB JPG
In order to manage overpopulation, would you be happy if the world participated in a "downsizing" project, where a significant proportion of the population was shrunken? There'd be benefits to being shrunken like cheaper things, more abundant food etc etc. Would you rather remain regular sized in this sort of world or tiny? Would you prefer this to only happen to certain demographics of people?
>>
>>538404884
No, I have no desire to end up in some elites asshole like a hamster.
>>
>>538405007
speak for yourself you fuckin weirdo



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.