FACT: There is not a single instance in any country on the planet where women have protested to be included in a Military Draft. At no point in recorded human history has a single woman, EVER, at any point protested to stop the blatant sexism and discriminatory selection process of an All Male Military Draft.An ALL MALE MILITARY DRAFT is by definition discriminatory by sex against women, it deems then "lesser-than" simply due to their biological sex, this has remained the same for thousands of years and yet at no point in recorded human history has a woman ever protested this fact.
>>538429681The argument I hear from women:>Women didn't start the wars, men didOr something that shifts the blame to men like that
>>538429681women are equal, that is why the expect special treatment.
1. The 1980 Registration Protests (Direct Action)During the reinstatement of the draft under President Jimmy Carter in 1980, women engaged in direct civil disobedience to protest their exclusion. Women Attempting to Register: As confirmed by Selective Service officials and contemporary reports, women physically went to post offices and attempted to register for the draft. When clerks refused their forms, these women staged sit-ins and demonstrations at the registration sites.The "Jimmy Carter" Protest: Some women (and men) registered under the name "Jimmy Carter" or filled out forms as a satirical protest against the male-only requirement, explicitly highlighting the inequality of the system.Public Statements at Rallies: At anti-draft rallies in 1980 (such as in Boston and San Francisco), specific factions of feminists broke from the main "abolish the draft" message to argue that if registration existed, it must include women. They distributed literature and gave speeches demanding equal obligation.I just copy pasted AI response but you are wrong so your movie Op-slop
>>538429996>kosher ai model generated slopsure buddy, I bet it tells you Rosa Parks was real too!
>>538430048>not this kind of thing! I meant some else kind of thing that soothes my bruised ego!
>>538430080It's bullshit anon, I just looked it up and they were protesting the war itself not the exclusion of women in the draft. Your kosher AI slop has no value here.
>>538430115You are right I apologize. I asked the AI again and it said this."Yes, you can say that with historical confidence.Throughout the history of the women's rights movement, women have never marched, rallied, or organized a public protest demanding the right to be forcibly conscripted into military service.The Historical Record Suffrage Era (WWI): During the fight for the vote, suffragists like Carrie Chapman Catt highlighted women's voluntary service and contributions to the war effort to argue for citizenship. They explicitly did not demand the obligation of conscription, which was viewed as an outlandish concept for women at the time. Their argument was based on voluntary sacrifice, not forced service.The 1980 Draft Registration Debate: When President Jimmy Carter proposed registering women in 1980, the response from major feminist organizations was opposition to the draft itself, not a demand for inclusion."
>>538430992Stop using kosher AI models as a (((fact checker))) you may as well be quoting Mark Levin when you use kosher AI models.
>>538429681and this is why women should SHUT THE FUCK UP.
>>538435260correct
>>538429681if everyone just repeated this point and refused to go on any tangential arguments feminism would have never even started. Can we simply just repeat a one-liner until the problem goes away? I think yes.Say it with me: "Women need to vote YES to female drafting before we provide equal rights."
>>538429789>men didBut they didn't, it's the kike
