FACT: There is not a single instance in any country on the planet where women have protested to be included in a Military Draft.At no point in recorded human history has a single woman, EVER, at any point protested to stop the blatant sexism and discriminatory selection process of an All Male Military Draft.An ALL MALE MILITARY DRAFT is by definition discriminatory by sex against women, it deems then "lesser-than" simply due to their biological sex, this has remained the same for thousands of years and yet at no point in recorded human history has a woman ever protested this fact.
>>538475034That's a blatant lie. Feminists supported the equality amendment (which conservatives blocked) and supported including women in SSS registration. Whoops
>>538475127WRONGThat was on VOLUNTARY military serviceAs in if a female FELT LIKE ITAt no point in Human Recorded History in ANY NATION on the PLANET has a woman ever protested to be included in forced conscription in times of war.
>>538475239WRONG. on reinstatement of the Selective Service in 1980 feminists supported including women.Conservatives said since women weren't drafted in the Bible, they shouldn't be now.Look it up
>>538475328WRONGLook it up, in the 1980s they were PROTESTING THE WAR ITSELF not the discriminatory selection process of an All Male Military Draft. At no point in HUMAN HISTORY has a woman ever protested the fact that they are excluded from the All Male Forced Conscription Policy.
>>538475452WRONG AGAIN. There was no war in 1980. Keep lying conservacuck shitter. I know you aren't used to getting shut down so early
>>538475034Careful, you are going to get the unholy nightmare blunt rotation of simps, Christcucks, Patriotards, SSRI ridden foids and feminists all in one thread attacking you for this very one simple example of hypocrisy in granting women’s rights (which are really just privileges). White western women are the most protected class of people on the planet, even more than Jews.
>>538475532WRONG AGAIN, NIGGERThe protests were related to the VIETNAM war which ended in 1975 where many young males came back after being conscripted and were struggling with mental health issues and drug addiction not to mention finding stable workTHE PROTESTS IN 1980 WERE A DIRECT RESULT OF THAT UNPOPULAR WAR AND THE MILLIONS OF YOUNG MEN WHO WERE CONSCRIPTED TO FIGHT IN ITTHE PROTESTS WERE AGAINST "WAR" ITSELF AS I ALREADY MENTIONED.THE PURPOSE OF THE PROTESTS WERE NOT TO DEMAND WOMEN BE INCLUDED IN A MILITARY DRAFTTHE PURPOSE OF THE PROTESTS WAS TO "END" MILITARY DRAFTS AND TO "END" WAR.
>>538475647WRONG AGAIN.There were no protests in 1980. You're illiterate beyond imagination.Conservative Republican men betrayed men. At least feminists had some principles.Where were (are) yours?
>>538475328KYS foid. Childless women are leeches on society. There is literally 0 reason women should not be drafted since none of them are having kids. We don’t need you SSRI parasites in the workforce, women either have kids or fuck off to the military along with the men.
>>538475833>there were no protests against the discriminatory selection process of an ALL MALE MILITARY DRAFTCORRECT!At NO POINT IN HUMAN HISTORY has a woman, EVER, protested against the inherent discriminatory practice of All Male Military Drafts.
>>538475034actually
>>538475833This isn't Reddit.Return.
>>538475844I wasn't addressing you, moron.>>538475990Not what I said. But again, your illiteracy is proven.Conservatives reintroduced male-only draft registration. Men sued. Feminists said the men were right. Conservatives betrayed men as they always do. Learn who your enemies are.
Do we really need more femslop spam threads? Just stop.
>>538476234>Men sued, women did nothingCORRECT, at NO POINT IN HUMAN HISTORY, has a woman, EVER, protested the fact that they benefit from the inherent and systematic discrimination and sexism that is an ALL MALE CONSCRIPTION POLICY.
>>538475034You chuds are pretty much women then crazy how much weak do nothing man children relate to women
>>538475034wistoria s2 when
>>538475034Yeah cuz feminists just want power and privilege. Equality is of no concern to them or this would be a huge issue for them.
HERE'S AN ARTICLE DATED JAN 25, 1980 FROM THE JEW YORK TIMES!>Prominent feminists and the leaders of various women's groups reacted cautiously yesterday to the prospect that women might be required to register for the draft. Most op- posed the idea of draft registration for either men or women >Phyllis Schlafly, the leader of opposition to the equal rights amendment, said she thought the plan would be re- jected by the American people and Congress. "There is no evidence in history that a unisex army is the way to win bat- tles or to defend the country," she said. "If we did not need to draft women during World War II, when fighting two tre- mendous enemies, surely there is no need to draft them today.'" >Eleanor Smeal, president of the National Organization for Women, took a similar position for different reasons. She said her organization was "totally opposed" to the draft for both men and women on the ground that “the draft is more sexist" than a voluntary army. I could go on but you get the pointAT NO POINT IN HUMAN HISTORY HAS A WOMAN EVER PROTESTED TO BE INCLUDED IN A FORCED CONSCRIPTION POLICY
>>538476311If you were literate, you would know people who are wronged sue, therefore men sued. What standing would a woman have? Google is right over there. You can look up the entire reintroduction of Selective Service in 1980 and Rostker vs. Goldberg in 1981, and statements from feminist organizations at the time.
>>538476234No one cares you childless, excess female parasite.
>>538476666CHECKEDRead the Jew York Times article I just quotedBoth the "conservative" female wing opposed the inclusion of women in a military draft AND the feminists at the National Organization for Women opposed it as well.At no point in human history has a woman, EVER, protested to be included in a forced conscription policy!
>>538476617>Feminists: draft for men bad>OP: I TOLD YOU FEMINISTS DONT SUPPORT THE DRAFT FOR WOMENRemember, it goes in the options field.
>>538476666Pretty sure you lost this debate
>>538477025>If we just oppose "War" then that makes it OKIt's an asinine position to take because war is never going to go away and forced conscription will always be a policy somewhere in the world (Ukraine right now for example)so saying you>oppose a military draftis not a real positionsaying you>oppose waris not a real positionbecause ultimately when it comes down to it the people who will be dying a ditch with their intestines hanging outside their body will be young males and the benefactors of their deaths will be females. This inherent privilege is the reality that all women desperately want to avoid and certainly never, ever, suggest that their privilege should be diminished or go away.
>>538476617>>538476617Phyllis Schlafly is hardcore rightwing and opposed the draft for her own benefit, but was fine with men going. As I said already, conservative men betrayed you but it was to serve conservative women - like Phyllis Schlafly.As for Eleanor Smeal, I see you quoted only part of her statement and you conveniently left off the rest, in which she opposes the draft for everyone.Nice try.
>>538477419>she opposes a draft for everyoneRead the post above yoursThat's not a real positionSaying >peace and love there should be no conflict everis not a real position
