File: 1780464304359317.png (703 KB, 553x898)

703 KB PNG

>>538478756
you're trying to find reason among the people who crucified logos

>>538478938
Are Jews the biggest freaks on earth? I knew they were bad but wow.

>>538478938
jesus was a jewish psyop and never existed as a historical figure

>>538479840
>never existed as a historical figure
Below is a list of ancient historical figures whose existence is widely accepted by historians, even though the evidence for them is weaker than the evidence for Jesus of Nazareth when judged by standard historical criteria (number of sources, independence, dating, and hostile attestation).

Figures with Less Evidence Than Jesus

Socrates (469–399 BC)
Sources: Plato, Xenophon, Aristophanes
Weakness: No writings of his own; all sources are followers or literary critics
Still universally accepted as historical

Pythagoras (c. 570–495 BC)
Sources written 200–500 years later
Weakness: No contemporary evidence; heavily legendary material
Accepted as historical with uncertain details

Spartacus (d. 71 BC)
Sources: Plutarch, Appian (decades later)
Weakness: Few sources; all hostile Roman accounts
Accepted as historical

Hillel the Elder (c. 110 BC–AD 10)
Sources: Mishnah and Talmud (compiled centuries later)
Weakness: No contemporary records; religious tradition only
Accepted as historical Jewish teacher

Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama, c. 5th century BC)
Sources written 300–400 years after his life
Weakness: No contemporary or hostile sources
Majority of scholars accept his existence

Lycurgus of Sparta
Sources: Plutarch (centuries later)
Weakness: Possibly legendary; no contemporary evidence
Often treated as semi-historical

Apollonius of Tyana
Source: Philostratus (3rd century AD)
Weakness: Single late, hagiographic source
Accepted as a real person; miracles rejected

Why Jesus Has Stronger Evidence
Jesus is attested by:
Multiple independent sources
Hostile non-Christian writers (Tacitus, Josephus, Pliny, Lucian)
Early references (within ~20–60 years)
Embarrassing details (crucifixion)

Conclusion: Many ancient figures are accepted as historical with less evidence than Jesus. Rejecting Jesus’ existence while accepting these figures applies an inconsistent historical standard.

>>538480302
we can agree they are all fake then. dinosaurs and evolution is also fake btw. the moon is an alien ship and they are lying about the age of the planet

Boring thread, go pray to your faggot cocksucker god jesus

>>538480302
>forgets Plato, Aristotle are fake

File: eyewitness timeline.png (165 KB, 1042x730)

165 KB PNG

>>538480302
>even though the evidence for them is weaker than the evidence for Jesus of Nazareth
can you name 1 (one) contemporary that isn't from the bible?

also there was absolutely no reason for the people in antiquity to make up any of these figures but there are plenty of reasons to make up jewsus.
jews believed as per torah aka septuagint , they needed to slander goats (yom kippur) and birds and by doing so they would be transferring all their sins and child rapes and sacrifices and murders and lies onto these poor animals and then they killed the animals believing they had sent them to hell to serve time in their place. But jews chimped out and fucked around and found out and Romans sacked the temple and no temple = no slander = no sacrifice = no redemption for the jew. what do? ackchyually some 60 years ago some rabbi who was also the son of yahweh himself came down and he sacrificed him as the ultimate yom kippur and passover sacrifice so they are good and didn't need the temple anyway lol silly goyim thinking they scored a goal with the destruction of the temple. we didn't need it anyway
but then they realized they could weaponize this as a new religion for the goyim and poisoned it. not the first they did something like this too
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabazios#Judean_connection