Anon, I’m curious about your guys general thoughts on foids and how you’ve come to see them the way you do... how would you describe your views on females, including things like females in politics whether positive or in some kind of patriarchal way of thinking, their overall role in society or even relationships, and how you think females tend to think, act, or maybe make decisions? What do you think influences women’s behavior and motivations--is it innate?
I've loved every women I've ever known. Every single one.
>>538517317Fuck off we're full.
>>538517317Greedy creatures without long term thinking exactly like men>In B4 some seeth 95% of earth population are cattle that definitely needs to be ruled over instead of being free. This whole mess is why btw
>>538517317You're not supposed to hate them, but to hatefuck them.
>>538517317>general thoughts on foidsMany different versions.
>>538517546can you explain some?
>>538517317Nothing but contemporary antiquity, not even a drop in the stream of timeGive it another decade and your problems will become old, change, solve/erase themselves or will be solved/erased
>>538517399right... whatever this means..
>>538517317Quit responding. Datamining thread. Abort.
>>538517910what problems lol?
>>538517317The only two women I give a flying fuck about are my two daughters, the rest can fuck right off for all I care...
>>538517317women are just as emotional and shitty as men just in different ways. Some ways better than men, some ways worse, ultimately though women might make better leaders.
>>538517317The decline of men approaching women functions like a political shock even when nobody frames it that way.It reshapes family formation. Fewer approaches mean fewer relationships, later marriages, lower birth rates, and accelerating demographic decline. That feeds directly into labor shortages, pension stress, immigration politics, and generational conflict. Governments can pass incentives but they cannot legislate attraction or courage.Second, it polarizes gender politics. Many women interpret non-approach as disinterest or resentment while many men experience it as rational risk avoidance shaped by social sanction, economic precarity, and fear of misreading norms. Each side builds narratives about the other and political movements harvest those grievances.Third, it weakens informal social trust. Approaching a stranger used to be a low-level civic act that trained people to tolerate rejection, ambiguity, and difference. When that disappears, people retreat into apps, algorithms, and identity-filtered spaces which harden group boundaries and reduce empathy.Fourth, it shifts power to platforms and institutions. Dating apps, HR departments, and legal frameworks mediate intimacy that used to be negotiated face to face. That concentrates cultural authority in systems optimized for liability management and profit, not human bonding.Finally, it produces downstream radicalization. Large populations of unattached men historically correlate with instability, withdrawal, or extremist politics. Most do not become violent but many disengage from civic life, work, and optimism itself which is politically corrosive.
