[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: licensed-image (2).jpg (215 KB, 2048x1365)
215 KB JPG
He picked Kavanaugh and Barrett. What a fucking retard.
>>
File: 928Days.png (2.79 MB, 1966x1980)
2.79 MB PNG
>>538533114
Maintain the rage!
>>
But but… it’s not his fault! Trump picks the best people! He’s going to drain the swamp, he doesn’t submit to special interests like all the others! Trump is different!
>>
File: catholic-court-600.jpg (107 KB, 1200x840)
107 KB JPG
>>538533114
what is the Vatican jesuits.
>>
>>538533114
Actually he did his part. It’s all Kavanaugh and Barrett’s fault.
>>
birthright citizenship is in the constitution so no, not really. its the constitutions fault, not anyone elses
>>
>>538533114
njo not his fault that they botched the ruling...but it is his fault he didnt appoint competent people. barret with adopted niglets would never vote to end birthright even if george washington rose from the fucking dead and told her such was the clear intent. not until they grow up and rape her will she even begin to get there, but being a woman she will just blame white men as the reason her niglets rape.
>>
>>538533114
>What a fucking retard.
the constitution is explicitly in favor of birthright citizenship
>>
>>538535823
nominating the adopted niglets lady really was the most retarded thing anyone could've done in that situation
>>
>>538533114
jews need their pets, of course they were going to keep it
numbers go up infinitely or the ponzi scheme falls
>>
File: subjects.jpg (52 KB, 1331x147)
52 KB JPG
>>538535916
Sure, if you pretend this one inconvenient little line just means NOTHING AT ALL and you just ignore it.
>>
File: Axshually.jpg (77 KB, 1462x401)
77 KB JPG
>>538536060
you fags always do this. You did it also with the second amendment to pretend everyone can have a gun, but if you read like a normal human you are looking for what it says in totality rather than hurr durr but this word ok!
>>
>>538536171
>but if you read like a normal human
You have to pretend it means nothing and the authors included it for literally no reason at all.
Very jewish of you to pretend that's a "normal" interpretation.
>>
File: 1740964709932890.jpg (26 KB, 650x439)
26 KB JPG
Trump did the best he could, the EO on birthright citizenship was the right thing to do, those scumbags on the SCOTUS could have saved the country and they chose not to. And the Congressional GOP won't do it either.
>>
>>538533114
>>
>>538536263
its a fancy way to say that people born in the united states are subject to the jurisdiction of the USA which is why it is proceeded by the word AND. Its just like how with the second amendment it says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" while talking about what a militia is entitled to.. to protect states from a tyrannical federal government. Learn to read fag.
>>
>>538533114
Mitch McConnel recommended Barrett.
>>
>>538536514
The reason it says AND is because it's and ADDITIONAL QUALIFIER you fucking brainlet.
It's not enough to be born in the U.S, you must be born in the U.S ~~AND~~ subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

Which is of course the way it was interpreted and implemented at the time when it was written, which you have to conveniently ignore.
>>
File: images.jpg (18 KB, 469x354)
18 KB JPG
>>538533114
>implying it wasn't all intentional that it worked out this way
Congress, which is currently fully controlled by the red kikes, could pass a law to change it any time. I wonder why they won't.
>>
File: 1775947879552657.jpg (70 KB, 1024x602)
70 KB JPG
>guy who historically sucks at buisness and making deals fails again
its shocking he couldnt make a deal to end birth right citizenship
>>
this was by design. trump doesn't want to abolish the 14th. but he does want to make you think he does. to maintain the 2 minutes of hate
>>
>>538536589
if you are born in the united states, you are under its jurisdiction. Thats literally what the amendment is about.


throw another shrimp on the barbie retard, I'm American and you aren't. I know more than you about my country
>>
>>538536802
>if you are born in the united states, you are under its jurisdiction.
Simply untrue, I can think of several examples where this is not the case - can you?
>>
File: 1783138260494466.jpg (56 KB, 816x612)
56 KB JPG
>>538536906
lol so you think that you as a shrimp eater can just come to the usa and rape and kill people because you are hurr axshually im under the jurisdiction of my country on the other side of the world ok
>>
>>538537030
>this retarded old argument

I don't even have to come to the USA, I can stay right here in my mother's basement and if I hack into U.S digital infrastructure and cause damage to it, your government CAN AND WILL charge me with crimes in a U.S court.
Surely you don't think I am currently, where I sit, under U.S jurisdiction?
>>
File: 1782777128019445.jpg (215 KB, 1079x608)
215 KB JPG
>>538537218
if you were here and did it you would be in prison, so you would be under USA jurisdiction. Dats why if born here u under jurisdiction
>>
>>538537381
If I'm here and I did it, I would still be charged by a U.S court.
So does that mean I'm currently under U.S jurisdiction?
Or does that mean that a person doesn't actually have to be under U.S jurisdiction for a U.S court to charge them and your argument is retarded?

Think long and hard about this one big fella.
>>
>>538537480
>If I'm here and I did it, I would still be charged by a U.S court.
>So does that mean I'm currently under U.S jurisdiction?
that is a different thing, anything that happens inside the USA is under its jurisdiction, minus diplomatically immunity pedos from isreal
>>
>>538533114
The executive can't change the constitution. That's for Congress. Do you basic civics?
>>
>>538537648
>anything that happens inside the USA is under its jurisdiction
DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING

If the damaged persons or property are under U.S jurisdiction, then I can still be charged by U.S courts, even if I am not under U.S jurisdiction.
So your argument that I could "rape and kill people in the U.S" and get away with it because I'm a subject of the Australian government is retarded and you should feel ashamed for being stupid enough to try it.
>>
>>538537784
we are talking about the constitution idiot, not the thing you are trying to make a thing to win the argument which you lost long ago.
>>
>>538537873
We're talking about the retarded argument that YOU MADE retard, don't tell me it's off topic now after you were the one who made it.
>>
>>538537952
now you are just doing typical chud debate shit, fuck you. You lost tranny.
>>
File: 1740710767823504.png (264 KB, 785x1000)
264 KB PNG
>>538538005
>FUCK YOU CHUD

Better luck next time champ
>>
>>538535778
No it's not, idiot poojeet, 'And subject to the jurisdiction thereof' doesn't include and invading force. The genocide levels of illegal immigrants that were funneled into the country was done outside of both the consent of the American people as well as outside of the law, aka Outside of jurisdiction.
Every justice that voted from this is far more heinous than any nazi or communist despot guilty for murdering millions — for they themselves voted for a genocide reaching into the hundreds of millions



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.