Now, more than ever, we need a Marxist (or leftist) critique of sex and human sexuality.Sexual lust is a stain on civilization. It destroys communities, promotes selfishness and furthers the idea that human beings are worthy only insofar as they provide pleasure or “usefulness” to the other. One can clearly see the link between the normalization of sexual lust and eugenics for this reason. It also causes social instability and moral decay.Non-sexual love is about what you give to the other person, lust is about what you mindlessly take from the other person.So far, the only philosophers and thinkers I’ve seen who thoroughly critique human sexuality are either ancient and medieval thinkers, or modern-day right-wingers who rely on said ancient/medieval critiques. Where are all the Marxist critique of sexual lust and what a massively destructive force it is? Marxism needs to promote the idea sex is solely for the act of procreation and mutual pleasure between monogamous partners. It is because our modern society is ruled by lust that we see vast amounts of moral decay. Moral relativism is everywhere. Secularism and capitalism have destroyed any sense of virtue. Desire to take from others sexually has made these things almost impossible to fight against.Marxism must critique sexuality and promote sexual abstinence and purity. Especially now that our own are being destroyed by sex scandals and #metoo bullshit.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBWAi0ZCfdk
>>538551502Doesn't matter. All candidates had sex. Enjoy running no one for 20 years
>>538551964No socialist should ever be a pervert, much less a rapist.
>>538551985Retard