what does this pic mean? one person at the top, say elon musk, should be whipping multiple horses? or many people at the top should be whipping one horse? shouldn't redditors love the idea of many people at the top whipping one horse?
>>538553432It's a picture about rent-seeking behavior, whereby more managers is better than more workers to resolve shortfalls in productivity. It's reddit coded in that it cries about corporations doing it, while conveniently ignoring the fact that that picture also applies to government bureaucracy and it's regulators. In general it's a fundamental problem with managerial bureaucracy, and the managerial class in general, who have taken over civilization in both it's capitalist and socialist forms, displacing the old ruling classes, and enriching themselves by taking from producers while providing nothing of value themselves.
>>538553560>troon starts bitching about landlords because his mother tells him to pick up his piss jugs
>>538553432i guess it's making a point about the proliferation of managers, and that's true to some extentI worked in tech for about 10 years and managers consistently outnumbered actual coders
Instead of hiring more workers, you push the one you have more with HR managers who only got their positions via nepotism or sucking dick.
>>538553560Based and Belloc-pilled analysis
>>538553432did this really need an AI render????
>>538553784You don't even own a house, do you? I do. I can afford to buy more. You know why I don't? Because it doesn't create free money from thin air, it directly steals it from the capacity of young White families to buy their own homes, that is evil, and I will have no part of it. Landlords should be marched into the desert and made to crush rocks with a sledgehammer until they die; the first and last real work they'll ever do.
>>538554846>>538553560dilate tranny
>>538554907If you don't have a house, a wife and kids, there is no functional difference between you and the tranny strawman in your mind.
>>538555065you do own a house so there is no functional difference between you and the landlord strawman in your mindfaggot
>>538553432that's not a corporate solution, that is a union solution.
>>538555165There is, because I live in my house with my family, rather than using it to prevent other families from having one. I know it seems hopeless to try to pull yourself out of the hole you're in, so it's easy to be bitter and pretend to be more stupid than you really are, but it is possible.
>>538555289the funny thing about this thread is that i have both a house and family whereas you're a lying tranny who cut his own nutsack off
>>538553560Fpbp >>538553784>>538554907>>538555165Total Boomer Death.It's not our fault you're too stupid to buy stocks.
>>538555345I don't believe that, and you don't either. I think you're just an angry zoomoid who will say and do anything as part of his fronting performance learned from niggers.
>>538555469oh no no no the tranny is fuming because it turns out he's homeless and i'm not lmfaoooo
>>538553432Overinlfation of HR whores and managers
>>538555492Like I said, lil bro.
not true in terms of hiring practice
>>538554713Holy shit a 4channer who can still read.
>>538553432u gotta put those jeet to some use
>>538555535like i said hobotroon. you got owned bitch
>>538553432Iron law of bureaucracy
>>538553432>corporation stagnating>instead of investing in workers fire them so management roles and shareholders can get a larger paya fourth picture would have the carriage sinking
>>538553432I hope elmo is paying you for this, because being this retarded on purpose may have long term consequences.
>>538553432The picture leaves out that the wagon is filled with provisions for the horse and the man (company assets), and that the load was carefully calculated to feed both horse and man for the week it will take to traverse their route (metaphor for open market). adding horses would cost more and only benefit them in the short term, and the excess horses would need to be culled after their usefulness ended and might not allow the team to make it to their goal, so it is cheaper and therefore more prudent in the short term to whip the shit out of the single horse and hope it can get the wagon unstuck. However, if the men in the wagon think the horse can continue to exert itself that much forever, then they will whip it to death and have no horse and all involved will die as they fail to make it to their goal. The more apt picture would be having the horse and wagon get stuck, the realistic solution would be for the man to get out of the wagon and push it, and in reality more people would get into the wagon and neither whip nor push while eating all of the goods the wagon and horse and driver were taking to market before chasing down the next passing wagon.
>>538553432>corporate logic>fire the horse and hire three Indians who somehow make the oil slick even more dirty
>>538553560>more managers is better than more workers to resolve shortfalls in productivityThis is true when the productivity does fall due to internal mechanisms, such as worker ability.But it's funny to watch when it's clearly something external that the worker will never overcome no matter how many whips are added.That's why several extra managers are needed, surely one of them will figure this out, until then, the upper ranks are assured the situation is monitored.
>>538556513>then they will whip it to death and have no horseBankruptcy rates are high.
>>538553787wow really? ive never seen that here. you must have it a lot worse. i think our public services are really bad for it though.
>>538553560>while conveniently ignoring the fact that that picture also applies to government bureaucracy and it's regulators.I work at a major food manufacturing plant, the FDA is always understaffed as hell, we rarely get inspected. Same with IRS, a ton of business skate through taxes, because there's a shortfall of people (and this was before Donald slashed both).The people who do effective governing are always in short supply, now they are basically at critical levels, everything from weather monitoring to basic human safety.Too many assholes at the top? Probably. But the bureaucracy wage slaves are the horse in that pic.
>>538556513>. adding horses would cost more and only benefit them in the short term, and the excess horses would need to be culled after their usefulness endedNo, all extra horses accomplishes is taking Ebin Gains away from the shareholders who have their dynastic wealth invested in shares. They might only get $1 return from each share instead of $1.20. I human tragedy of ebin proportions.
