>>538570272Jesus himself was a CommunistMatthew 19:21>Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be complete, go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”That sounds like urging for radical wealth redistribution to the proletariat to me
>>538570272
>>538570335> Willingly giving to the poor from the kindness of your heart is basically the same as a totalitarian government taking everything and giving it to the oligarchsJesus was talking to a potential disciple here. So basically what you would consider a missionary. That's why the man was told to sell all his wealth.Jesus was 100% apolitical. His Kingdom is not of this world. He was offered all political kingdoms of the world but declined, they are all and always were in the hands of Satan - particularly the Vatican.
>>538570335nigger are you retarded? Giving your stuff away isn't communism, giving OTHER people's stuff away is.
>>538570492Jesus called himself the "King of Kings" - Kings are a political entity. Read the NT again, it's an incredibly political text.>>538570544Being forced to give away your wealth under threat of damnation is definitely Communism. Jesus is explicitly saying all who don't give up their wealth never get to Heaven.
>>538570335>sell your possessions>YOUR
>>538570272What do Christians like kikes so much?
>>538570272theres nothing more communist than the maga movement
>>538570617Are you missing the point out of ignorance or on purpose?Jesus is the only true King, all other rulers are usurpers, even if God allows them for a time for good reason (Romans 13) When Jesus said his Kingdom was not of this world, he was telling the people he was not interested in ending the Roman occupation at this time - because his mission never was not political. Neither will his claim to the rule over earth be "political". It will come about through the final war and the destruction of man-made usurper kingdoms.You're the one that needs to not only read his Bible, but also study and reflect on it. There is nothing political about the Bible. The story of the Judges, Samuel and Saul prove that. Saul was representative of the failed earthly political kingdoms (demanded and legitimated by the people) and David was the foreshadowing of Jesus and of the Kingdom of Heaven (the divine realm ruling over Earth again). You are cherrypicking and warping things to make it reflect your fundamentally worldly view.
>>538571512>"Yes, Jesus calls himself a King and tells his followers what to do with their finances but that's not political because he didn't challenge Rome as much as he could have!"Weak argument. Read the Bible again.
Excommunicate his ass LeoRight wing Tradkikes are proteshits in disguise, liberation theology is God's will.
>>538570335Christ only preached to the jews wnd never to the gentiles, so that wasn't meant for us. It was meant for the jews who obsess about taking everyone's property and savings. Nothing communist about that, because communism is a weapon used by jews against gentiles.
>>538571800By that logic, Christianity itself wasn't meant for gentiles
>>538570272>caths taking marching orders from jewsBuck status?
>roman catholics whoring themselves out to the world by involving themselves in politicsnothing new under the sun
>>538571318Because they are one and the same. They're Jew's Goy Division
>>538570272Is this the same Catholic Church that historically opposed usury?
>>538570272>Rober Barron>we need to stop the working man from organizing!fucking clown world
>>538570272oh cool, what does he think about israel
>>538571318>>538572150
>>538570272>Isareal threat
>>538570272>What happens when a priest doesn't read the BibleGRIM
>>538570272The first Christians lived as Communists in accordance to the Gospels:"All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need."—Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35
>>538573310Notice how Christcommies haven't responded to this one
>>538570335socialism and charity are two opposite things, tranny
>>538574665Not when a religious authority who styles himself as "King" tells his followers they have to do it (or else they're going to Hell). It's not any less compulsory compared to Communism.
>>538570272oh so allowing trannies and faggots into the congregation who partake in literal sodomy is just fine... but politics is where you draw the line?the kikes really are weaponizing the JEW-DAY-OH christians aren't they?
>>538570272DSA: Kike and Nigger-Free Since 2023!!
>>538574834fortunately, that's not the case in Catholicism, so what's your point even
>>538579181Catholicism =/= ChristianityYou're all hellbound pagans masquerading as "Christians"
>>538576748Is it faggot and tranny free?
>>538570272>Father Robber BaronVery funny Yaldabaoth
>>538570335Zero communist sells the possessions and give them to the poor. They take it from whoever they define as rich, like how jews define Amalek. Communism is basically secular judaism
