that makes sense, knowing that the universe is indifferent, and "life" is but a statistical accident, a particle based anomalie
>>538574729>t.17 year old white kid from suburbs who just read camus after seeing midwits worship him in tiktokYou'll grow out of this phase.
>>538574932So what cult do you try to sell>looks at flagtell me more about the jew, why does he make you sprege out marx?
My dick so heavy it has to ride on the roof.
>>538575504Yet another excellent Kazak post.
>>538575038My name is marx,and I am jewish,and I love my fellow jews. Deal with it goyim.Also,I selling you stoicism. Become a based stoic that doesn't give a fuck about things that are out of our control.
>>538576191show flag Ibrahim
>>538574729there's no such thing as "accidents". everything in existence follows rigid cause and effect. it's literally not even possible for us to generate random numbers, so how could the world be random?
>>538576500statistical improbability is not per se random, its a possibility, just an extreme low one; that doesnt mean that it has any meaning or was "planned"
>>538576740there's no such thing as probability either, you fucking moron. everything is predetermined by cause and effect.
>>538576806>Probability doesnt existLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLSo you are a tue believer of something that you cant prove outside of your circular belif system. Got it, cultist
>>538576966>So you are a tue believer of something that you cant prove outside of your circular belif system.that describes you, you dumb nigger. you believe in absurdism which you can't prove if everything is absurd. you're literally in a cult you ridiculous fuck
>>538577225Absurdism is an anti-belief system. It assumes there is no meaning, but is open to create meaning ex-nihilo for fun, instead of dogamtic retadation like you Mormone mongoloids
>>538577225>you can't prove if everything is absurdis that a challenge
>>538577364>It assumes there is no meaningwhich is no different from assuming the existence of god you retard. you're no different from someone blindly religious. holy fuck you are goddamn stupid.
>>538578242wrong. Your belief system has totalitarian, authocratic fanatism baked into its dna. Your end state is always going to be teleological universalistic collectivistic millenarian eugenicism if you manage to trick enough brains iinto following your cult; absurdism is the only system of thought that is perfectly immune to this. A telos that is effectively an anti-telos can by design not spiral into totalitarian authoritarian fanatism
>>538574729>>538574932Imagine saying absurdity makes sense. His argument asserts that is that there is no meaning . But how does he right a book without those words not having meaning? And how does he have any distinction between right or wrong if there is no moral meaning. You can run this question along any dimension of meaning and realize his philosophy is fake and gay. Because obviously there a meaning
we are already living in the post irony age tho. joining the absurdists is joining the accelerationists. you can do that but you shouldnt expect sympathy from anyone. theres nothing special about being anti society in 2026 anymore.my moms 90 year old aunt complains about niggers all the time and 2/3rds of the locals believe in conspiracies. if youre an accelerationist here youre basically just another normie.
>>538579239language is itself less of a tool for description and more a tool of deception. There is no universal meaning, meaning is, will and has always been spatially and temporarily limited
>>538578511everything about your post is assertions, totalitarian and fanatic rambling. you're a blatant hypocrit.
>>538579358So you gonna ignore well over 5000 years of various teleological cults that went full retard? Okay
>>538579750>it's okay when i do iti never proposed or defended religion. i'm saying YOU are a religious cultist. and you just admitted it right now because you tried a whaataboutism instead of defending yourself. you LOSE nigger
>>538579799>everything in existence follows rigid cause and effect
>>538579337>language is itself less of a tool for description and more a tool of deceptionIs this sentence deception?
>>538579943that's basic logic you absolute fucking moron, it has nothing to do with religion.
>>538580055Naturally
>>538580213> naturlichYou realize that this is a contradiction. If you say language does not have meaning, but yet you claim to understand the meaning of Camus or my posts, then you contradict yourself. Which is no longer a philosophical argument, it’s simply wrong
>>538580440not no meaning>There is no universal meaning, meaning is, will and has always been spatially and temporarily limitedIts just the nominalist argumentIt is no contradiction, I never claimed (nor mentioned in that regard) Camus as my epistemic authority, you are just projecting apparently.Jst because I use a word that you associate with some author doesn't mean I regard that author as THE truth source.Yes, that "means" communication is never going to be a complete, nor a perfect system, and the more the concept of epistemic authority blurs and disappears into entropic noise the more fun it becomes, fr fr, no cap
>>538580759that doesn't refute what he said, retard. you are contradicting yourself. words can only have meaning if we have the tools to determine meaning, and if we have those tools then they can be applied elsewhere.
>>538581049tools? The tool is your brain that got brainwashed into artificial consensus about the "meaning" of a certain sequence of symbols; and apparently tricked into believing these symbols and the meaning associated with them is universal and eternal
