Why don't we have open borders for women?Aren't women such a valuable resource historically, that we ought to raid other nations for them?Give me one good reason why pic rel shouldn't flood our streets
>>538581660Youre stupid
>>538581660>require marriage to a local to move hereImagine.
>>538581660We tried that once...
>>538581660>Aren't women such a valuable resource historicallyYou watched Supergirl, didn't you.
>>538581660You don't want to give something like that for western women to leverage.We need to find a way to make breeding an acceptable proposition again for Westerners without it costing an absolute fortune, but where they still retain sufficient autonomy, freedom and dignity within a certain framework.
>>538581660Women are the reason it doesn't happen only faggots wouldn't fuck a gook you don't gotta marry hero knock her up they are just holes bro
>>538581660>all third world countries start sending their pregnant women over for free gibs>ack! not like that!Retard
>import leeches that live off government gibsThat does not help anyone except the NGOs that get government cheese to distribute tendies.
wow amazing idea brolets make womens lives even EASIER
>>538582449exactly we would solve the birth rate problem overnight. god knows our taxes would be better spent on picking up our slack than where ever they go now.>>538582460>at least one parent must be a citizen to get gibsgee that was a hard case to handle
>>538582254what nikka
>>538581660Women are negative resources. Your pic rel has a birthrate of 0.9 and ended her own race and civilization.
>>538581660Because women are horrible people and have done enough damage already, thanks
>>538581660Brexit happened because women didn't like the country being flooded by white Christian highly educated eastern European women. ("I am sexy barista, also MSc with distinction advanced nuclear engineering").You will notice the "Boris Wave" they wanted instead had a somewhat different demographic.
>>538583050>>538583067Incels
>>538582921Opening up new frontiers, while keeping the homefront capable of supporting them sufficiently.a race war wouldn't be the worst thing to happen either.
>>538581660antisemitic
>>538583234Call me the i word irl and I’ll AR-15 ur family cunt
>>538583050>>538583642Are you half asian
>>538584103>replied to the same post twiceYou lost. In your own thread too, how embarrassing
>>538581660WIVES? WIVES FOR OUR WESTERN KEKS? NO, NEVER! LABOR ONLY!
>>538582007No, only cucks who shill Karens watched ghat
>>538582254Bringing in more women would accomplish that.
>>538582855Nah, you just do it like this;>>538581777or like pic related.
>>538581660This is based and /pol/ is too homosexual to appreciate it. Peak darwinist policy
>>538581660Yeah let’s invite millions more liberal traitors into the west what could go wrong
>>538583050We're alredy running an iq shredder. Accelerate
>>538584672As a standalone thing, sure it would. But that's not necessarily helping anybody. It cancels out any advantages.
>>538581660We should have open borders for women aged 18-25. Only Europe and Japan. Then citizens can approve a couple requests each.
>>538581660Because you'll be flooded with uggos
>>538581660>Why don't we have open borders for women?
>>538584880>posting fake stats after 2016jamjeet
>>538581660You'd get so much more productivity from the male population it's not funny.>deport all none-national males>open borders for women 18-35 from Asia & Europe>local white women have to get gud to get a partner>lower crime rates because most violent crime is done by foreign none-white males>there's no incentive to crimemax as a male because of the sheer abundance of pussy
>>538586600That feels more wasteful to me than just telling western women they're wrong and it's time to make things right. You must realize that it was all a shit test from the very beginning.
>>538586723It's much more practical. The issue with trying to put White women into something like sharia is that both White women and White men will reject it; just about every White man who already "has his" will reject the idea of pledging his daughters to that type of scheme. Fundamentally he just won't see a need for it and it will be easy to propagandize against by pointing out (correctly) that it's much more like Muslim ideas about women than Western ideas. With importing women they'd have to explain why immigration is suddenly le bad to even start fighting it.
>>538587237Okay, you're correct about that. But maybe it's just because they haven't seen how dire the situation is in actuality yet.
>>538581660> Aren't women such a valuable resource historically, that we ought to raid other nations for them? Only small tribes and non-advanced societies that have literally nothing going for them other than their sexual desire did that. I do agree an immigration policy where women from blue countries enter, but we could send our incels abroad with welfare abroad so they could spread European DNA to countries in Africa to help civilise them. But you can't take any of the women from the low IQ countries home. Your DNA spreads out, it doesn't return.
>>538583050True, we should be exporting men, not importing women.
>>538581660It effectively is though? Foids will never hear "Go back where you're from" from anyone, and apart from that, there is no deterring factor since border enforcement is a joke in most countries and the visa system can be eaily played by everyone with even a little bit of cash.
>>538584738Absolutely based. I'd also add an IQ test to make sure we only get the best women with the best genes. Also a family history going back 3 generations with no convicted criminals.
>>538587775> Foids will never hear "Go back where you're from" from anyone An old woman once told my ex-wife "go back to China" and people occasionally scream "ching chong" at her. I also live in a pretty big city full of foreigners. While White people are afraid to insult Muslims and Niggers, they go all out on Asians and Eastern Europeans.
>>538587961True. At the very least it should be an available statistic on the biometrics, so applicants could make an informed decision.
>>538581660It's a good question. The "west" is very hypocritical when it comes to all these things. We are equal, but only men gets sent to war. We are equal, but only women gets to choose to keep a child or not. We are equal, you get my point. When it comes to importing thirdies apparently men are more valuable all of a sudden.>>538581788What do the colours represent? Biggest bundas?
>>538588353Fair enough. I probably overstated it, but as with everything else, foids get maybe 10% of what men get, at most. And probably mostly from other foids, men want women around in general, no matter what they are like.
>>538588353>An old woman once told my ex-wife "go back to China"White women hate asian women.
