Why did the former colonies of Great Britain became successful and prosperous First World countries while the former colonies of Spain became Third World shitholes? Why did the Spaniards that settled in Latin America failed so miserably at leadership and everything else while the British that settled in North America and Australia succeeded and lead these countries towards glory? What did the Spaniards do wrong? Are Northern Europeans simply superior?
>>538597532Race mixing + no actual whites living there to build a society nor prosperous countries.Show flag, jeet.
>>538597532Call me non white, call me an Argie, call me a shitskins, you will never recover from this quick history lesson, be THANKFUL.
>>538597532Show flag saar>in 712 and at the end of the 8th century by Charlemagne, who incorporated Catalonia into his realm as the Spanish March
>>538597532Is Zimbabwe succesful?
>>538597719That's racist! But correct.
>>538597532>Why did the former colonies of Great Britain became successful and prosperous First World countries while the former colonies of Spain became Third World>What did the Spaniards do wrong?The British had a parliamentary tradition and decentralized common law tradition for centuries, the Spanish (or French) did not.That meant in the US revolution only a political revolution took place, not a societal one.But in the Spanish colonies they only had absolutism and so a societal + political revolution took place and it was just too much. It had no leg to stand on.
>>538597719So do you believe if Latin America had gotten colonized by actual White Europeans instead things would have been different then?
>>538597532Racemixing and iberians in general are a low breed of European but you already knew that
>>538598242If they brought legal and political traditions with them that could survive without a king: Yes.
>>538597532Would you rather live in Mexico/Argentina or in India/Zimbabwe?
>>538598481I would choose a rich part of India over mexico
>>538597949Yes
>the former colonies of Great Britain became successful and prosperous First World countriesOnly the majority White ones. With the 2 exceptions being South Africa (though only until the end of White minority rule in the '90s), and Singapore (only through tremendous effort by the People's Action Party over several decades, aggressively fighting to stamp out minority agitators and rejecting a lot of post-colonial democratic ideas that were commonplace in former-British colonies)The rest slid right back into being shitholes. No one would consider Jamaica, or Nigeria, or Bangladesh a 'prosperous First World country'
>>538598242You're fucking retarded.What I meant to say is, most spaniards didn't stablish / live there (Latam), so therefore there was no prosperous society nor country to build. Northern Europeans did stablish, spaniards did not. The few that did just stayed there to control the retarded race-mixing mass-produced mestizo slaves, but nothing else.
>>538597532syphilis
>>538598336That is so fucking rich coming from you, nigger.You are a product of constant mutty race-mixing. You have no European roots. You're pretty much the same as a fucking beaner.
