what would happen if russia used tactical nuke on ukranie?
>>538628547Hi putin. Go back to your duties. People are getting upset at the pump.
>>538628547This would give NATO casus belli to kill and destroy what remains of russian army.
>>538628547They would win against Ukraine, but lose against everyone else
>>538628592why? ukr is not part of nato.
>>538628547Why use a tactical when a nice big 75 kt atom smasher does the job better? Built all those nukes to use them, might as well use them. Why pussy foot?
Nothing because nukes are fake and gay.
>>538628869Exactly. Use the bigger nukes. Hell drop a tzar bomb on them. Americans have already shown weakness regardless of their defense budgets. Highlight that fact with an icbm class nuke.
>>538628547the world would sanction RussiaNobody's gonna join a nuclear exchange over a country that's not their own
>>538628547It is not Would It is coming!Lviv and Kiev
>>538628547>what would happen if russia used tactical nuke on ukranie?Throw one and see what happens. You'll never know if you don't try.
>>538629842You dumb cunt they have for years already. Got anything else in your nothing burger Twitter suggestion box that's useless?>>538628869Nuke them with a real nuke to wake the dumb fucks up. That's pretty much what it's going to take.
>>538628547It's beginning to look like their only option to exit the war.I think the world would be shocked but there's not much anyone could do.
>>538628547300km of demilitarized zone in Russia
What would happen if NATO used tactical nuke on Russia for being obnoxious retards insistent on bringing history back to Europe?
Previously this would have resulted in an immediate attack by a US led NATO using conventional weapons. Unsure if that would happen under Trump. Every country would be compelled to completely cut ties with Russia, including China though.
>>538628547Nothing
>>538628547Russia would cease to exist.
What would happen if Ukraine started hitting russian shipping and took out 35 tankers in 3 days? Would that illicit a russian response?
What if Ukraine declared the russian fuel industry leaving them on the verge of starvation?Would this illicit a russian response?
>>538630607>Russia would cease to existSince that's nato's stated goal, what has Russia got to lose, except the righteous stance they've been holding onto with the entire SMO facade. But the recent attacks of Russian infrastructure, refineries, changes that. Demoralization of the Russian people will not end the way nato thinks it will (which is the same way the retards think it'll work in Iran). It won't catalyze the people against their country. It'll catalyze them against (((yours))).And just watch how quickly total war and nuclear annihilation gets the table when all of a sudden famine and national death with balkanization are also on the table.
>>538631480>Since that's nato's stated goalMay we see it?
>>538631480>Since that's nato's stated goal,I mean, it's quite a claim..... You surely have evidence?
>>538628547No one knows. It's difficult to predict global politics in contexts like this. When Russia went into Ukraine, they expected condemnation from the world, but no support. Instead, most of the free world sends support to Ukraine, extending what would have been a month of skirmishes to a four year war that will take decades to recover from. If Russia uses a tactical nuke, the world might just condemn the action and do nothing else, because it is tired of their conflict and has its own shit to deal with internally. But it could also, just as well, overreact and use that one nuke as a reason to go to war with Russia in earnest, almost certainly to stall internal conflicts and unite the west, which has been crumbling in loyalty for 8 years (at least, depending on what you deem as a start, it could be more). So really, it's anyone's guess. My prediction is that Russia will not risk provoking the west further. It deems the west as being weak right now, and using a tactical nuke would give western leaders an excuse to stop rattling their sabre, and actually draw it. It would be effortless to scare the population into support for this, because nuclear weapons are the boogeyman of the modern age.
>>538628547putin would get overthrown by younger subordinates who still have much of their life ahead of them, if he was close to deploying a nuke
>>538628575hey don't call your mother that
>>538628547Tremendous amounts of shitposting on our part.
>>538628547>Blowout soon, Stalker.>When?>N̶̠̳̤̬̰̎̀̊ͅǪ̴̤͓̹̖̤̦͓͙̪̓͐͌̑̾́̾͘̕͝W̸̢͖̟̟̞̋͂͐͛̂̈́̿͑̃̓̽́͌̕
>>538630577/thread
bump
>>538636746I would bump >>538633704 if you know what I mean
>>538628547>what would happen if russia used tactical nuke on ukranie?It would let the genie is out of the bottle, after whic whatever the sodomiZers and the Hog-Farmers are up to becomes irrelevant.I'm guessing the first thing after that would be Israel clearing land in a slightly different type of "Project Plowshare"
there's only one way to find out
>>538628547Depends if it was a civilian or military target.
>>538628547why would they? they've already destroyed ukraine. nuking them won't change their existential desire to destroy Russia. if anything it would just rapidly accelerate the retailiation / destruction of Russia
>>538628547Ukraine would get cycled out right awayAt most Poland would shout harder about wanting nukes and Germany would just keep it's courseBut it's not really part of the plan so this war is going to keep going for at least a year or two
The West would just consider them cowards for not having the balls to nuke a NATO member. Talinn should be nuked for a better message, otherwise the West will just keep escalating until a large warbis inevitable anyway.
>>538628869True, and I don't think a Nuclear response would happen from any NATO members, not even the deranged French and their spicy doctrine, if Putin nuked the hohols.BUT, it could be the first pepples in a landslide. Consider that Putins invasion of Ukraine is being justified as "pre-emptive". So Putin start using nukes, other major nuclear weapons powers might feel a need to do a bit of pre-emptive of their own, before he aims his nukes at them.
>>538628547>russiathats a weird way to spell gulaghomo
Putin's goal is to rebuild the USSR. That would make nuking Ukraine a rather stupid thing to do.
>>538628547us will nuke a couple empty russian military sites and then us/russia/china will use the aftermath to force all of the lesser nuclear powers to give up their weapons. this is already planned. if the war in ukraine doesnt end soon it will happen.
>>538638413>Putin's goal is to rebuild the USSR.So why are the jews against him?
>>538639385
>>538628547that ship has sailed. russia has failed to establish proper deterrents back in 2022-23 and now the natojew has become more and more emboldened, for which russian soldiers & civilians pay in blood every day. now if russia drops a nuke, it will reek of desperation. back in 2022 would be an awesome, ballsy move by the non-cuck putin. but now it's too late
>>538628547Tactical nukes are small. The front is extremely long and the soldier density surprisingly low as any concentration of troops gets either droned, rocketed or glide bombed. But still trenches are too close by for a nuke not to affect your own guys too. So very little effect besides making the world freak out about it. To have a real effect on the battle the Russian would have to pull back and than drop a dozen of those.If a tactical nuke is used towards a city probably over 10k casualties almost all civilians. But it would end up helping the Ukrainians politically far more than anything else.A larger strategic nuke could cause far more dead but still not usable at the front as it would irradiate the parts that Russia wants to occupy and cause mass evacuation from the occupied areas. So they could flatten Kiev and that would be beneficial to the Russian war efforts but also risks irradiating nearby NATO member Poland triggering much more problems and it would make Russia look genocidal and risk losing key Chinese support as nukes flying might give many countries including Taiwan the excuse to try for a nuclear weapon.
>>538639385Because they won't make the same mistake twice (putin doesn't actually want to recreate the ussr jews just want revenge)
>>538641043Overall there is really nit so much to gain from nuking "a little" if you nuke you should drop several dozens of tactical nukes to the main Ukrainian defensive lines and cities to cause mass evacuations and open enough of the front for a proper push and breaktrough. Potentially even using a much larger strategic nuke on Kiev to wipe out the chain of command. But than you would be occupying an irradiated shithole and your guys would have to advance in full Hazmat for months. And nobody knows what the reaction to this would be. Most likely not much militarily as everyone would be too shocked to react. But total blockades and other much harsher actions than normal sanctions would follow. And still even with all that it would just push the front maybe 100km forward if lucky not win the war outright.What it will most likely trigger is a new nuclear race.
muh dick would intensify
>>538632469If Russia using nukes at Ukraine and West doing nothing it has no limits to test nukes towards NATO countries either. Minimun response is give to Ukraine nukes and allow them use against Russia.
>>538628547The spam is wiiiiild with this shit. If you were really winning you fucking faggot you'd be gloating. Not the over 9000 threads where Russia posters are clearly already too buck broken to be able to view themselves in a positive light. Meme flags are for fags kill you're self also the game
>>538628675>but lose against everyone elseagainst Taiwan?
>>538628547>what would happen if russia used tactical nuke on ukranie?UN would fall apart most likelyand NATO as wellthere would be a very urgent need to create a new security structure agreement for the world
