Thoughts on designer babies? What's stops someone like Elon Musk from funding a company that breeds a ton of Aryan übermensch and brings the next step in human evolution?
>>538642682machines are less expensive in the long term and more reliable
>>538642682>What's stops someonejews, because the moment you start looking for perfect, you find white.
>>538642682I think should just skip to the next step.Complete lab grown humans. We did it for sheeps and some other animals already. Artificial wombs work.We have enough understanding of DNA and genetics to pump out tens of thousands of absolutely beautiful people with Olympian genetics every year instead of taking in immigrants. They could be raised as model citizens and forbidden to marry with each other so that the good genes can spread across the population over time.
>>538642682Why would Jewlon Musk want to create an aryan ubermensch?
>>538642682hes doing it and nature tooned his kidsyou cant cheat forever
>>538643367Because he cannot do so naturally. His penis is destroyed like that character in the Hemingway novel.
>>538642682designer babies are good.regular eugenics is evil.
>>538643049Correct poster is correct.
It's quite funny The rich breed noble breeds of dogs and horses but human eugenics is a taboo at least officially.Why this idea will not take root in elite circles. Because it is not a fact that the presence of high status always implies good genes. In reality, never.A closed club is gradually degenerating. To open a closed club for the good blood of a plebeian is to defile a closed club.The paradox of fools. Billions of low IQs are more valuable to them.Burn
>>538643760>It's quite funny The rich breed noble breeds of dogs and horses but human eugenics is a taboo at least officially.it's because you can't treat people like dogs.
>>538642682Solid 0/10
>>538642682Coping mechanism for nietzschian wannabes. Its a slave morality despite professing what should be master morality.
>>538642682That's a man
>>538644127That's the most beautiful woman I have ever seen in my life
>>538642682Cancer, probably. Sure, it they can do this, great. But its illegal to do it, and how are you going to test it?
Reminder that Phrenology is a completely legitimate science.
>>538643875>can't treat people like dogs.When was the last time you saw people treating dogs like that, especially rich people?They treat dogs better than humans.
My idea is just to take eggs from super models and beautiful women, put them inside ugly chicks and have them birth a kid with the pretty woman's egg.
>>538645118The US will let it be done regardless of it's legal and moral implications. They know it's them or China.
>>538642682There is already a normal form of Eugenics
>>538642682Built for BBC
>>538644127https://youtu.be/mJqvz6qMeW8
Because capital is more important for development than race, 99.99999999% of white people have never invented anything
>>538642682Eugenics ≠ LookismIt's about not having genetic disorders and diseases to begin with>AryanVery old and obsolete term (used by boomers and retards)
