>wrong about history>wrong about biology>wrong about cosmology>wrong about astronomy>wrong about geologyReligiosity should disqualify a person from voting and having political power
>>538670505>wrong about historyit's funny how atheists deny Jesus but don't deny any other ancient historical figures. The first history of Cleopatra came from Plutarch and was written more than one hundred years after her death. There is more written about Jesus in the one hundred years after his death than there is written about Julius Ceasar. Why don't atheists deny Cleopatra or Julius Ceasar existed?
>>538670505>wrong about biologyyou will never be a woman
>>538670505>wrong about cosmology/astronomyi don't see your flag on the moon
>>538670505>wrong about geologywhen god created adam, he created him as a man, not as a babyso too god can create the earth within seven days, while also creating it billions of years old
>>538670505>Religiosity should disqualify a person from voting and having political powerdemocrat ran cities are hellholes
>>538670505HOURLY REMINDER: there is no god, jesus never existed and when you die it will be nothingness for eternity!!!
>>538670627>>538670645>>538670653>>538670672Kys copy pasta faggot
>>538670728god's existence is a proven fact
>>538670505all of those criticisms are true except for the new testament
>>538670728Here is a list of ancient historical figures whose existence is widely accepted by historians, even though the evidence for them is weaker than the evidence for Jesus of Nazareth when judged by standard historical criteria (number of sources, independence, dating, and hostile attestation).Figures with Less Evidence Than JesusSocrates (469–399 BC)Sources: Plato, Xenophon, AristophanesWeakness: No writings of his own; all sources are followers or literary criticsStill universally accepted as historicalPythagoras (c. 570–495 BC)Sources written 200–500 years laterWeakness: No contemporary evidence; heavily legendary materialAccepted as historical with uncertain detailsSpartacus (d. 71 BC)Sources: Plutarch, Appian (decades later)Weakness: Few sources; all hostile Roman accountsAccepted as historicalHillel the Elder (c. 110 BC–AD 10)Sources: Mishnah and Talmud (compiled centuries later)Weakness: No contemporary records; religious tradition onlyAccepted as historical Jewish teacherBuddha (Siddhārtha Gautama, c. 5th century BC)Sources written 300–400 years after his lifeWeakness: No contemporary or hostile sourcesMajority of scholars accept his existenceLycurgus of SpartaSources: Plutarch (centuries later)Weakness: Possibly legendary; no contemporary evidenceOften treated as semi-historicalApollonius of TyanaSource: Philostratus (3rd century AD)Weakness: Single late, hagiographic sourceAccepted as a real person; miracles rejectedWhy Jesus Has Stronger EvidenceJesus is attested by:Multiple independent sourcesHostile non-Christian writers (Tacitus, Josephus, Pliny, Lucian)Early references (within ~20–60 years)Embarrassing details (crucifixion)Conclusion: Many ancient figures are accepted as historical with less evidence than Jesus. Rejecting Jesus’ existence while accepting these figures applies an inconsistent historical standard.
>>538670767It’s an unproven mentally ill opinion and you can’t cope
>>538670627Cleopatra and Caesar never claimed to RISE FROM THE DEAD OR WALK ON WATER YOU DUMB GYPSY FAGGOT. Now run back to your little gypsy hole.
>>538670505>>wrong about biologyAtheists believe in 900 genders and men getting pregnant.
>muh Kamala!>muh HRT>muh 900 genders! Here comes the schizo tranny faggot
>>538670870>Cleopatra and Caesar never claimed to RISE FROM THE DEAD OR WALK ON WATER YOU DUMB GYPSY FAGGOT.Doesn't mean Jesus didn't exist. Only complete retards like you and Carrier believe that. SAD
>muh 24 historians!
>>538670870Cleopatra, julius caesar, and jesus all claimed to be living gods on earth.You can dismiss cleopatra and caesar's claim easily enough and still believe they existed.It's only jesus's divinity claim that threatens you so much that you have to insist he didn't exist at all because of it.
>>538670964Source>my ass Kys christkike
STILL UNDEFEATED! 159-0!
>>538670927>>538670953Can't disprove anything, just posts "muh". SAD
>>538671019>159Still a higher number than the amount of historians that believe Jesus didn't exist. You are in an elite class of retards.
>>538670964documentation boss it's all there is I am not against the existence of Jesus but we are a bit scarce on records comparing to Julius Caesar or Cleopatra ykwimalso a god would never choose to be a kike it just doesn't make any sense
>>538671041>I am not against the existence of Jesus but we are a bit scarce on recordsWe literally aren't faggot. Tacitus mentioned Jesus.
>>538671037are the historians in the room with u right now
>>538671070>are the historians in the room with u right nowPure. R3ddit.What's next?>"touch grass">"this is a wendy's, sir"
>>538671059can u fucking read at all whatsoever how do u even use the internet negro
>>538671089cope harder nigger
>>538671113>can u fucking read at all whatsoever how do u even use the internet negroYou said "we are scarce on records". A mention of Jesus by one of the greatest historians of the ancient world isn't scarce you fucking faggot.
>>538670988Kvetch moar
>>538671135>cope harder niggerNo updoots for you here, faggot.
>>538670505>>538670741>HOURLY REMINDER: >seethes at people repeating in threadsKikes have no self awareness
>>538670627There's literally dozens of inscriptions and texts about Julius Caesar. None about Jesus beside texts written by people who worshipped him and mentions by Jews that some rival Jew heretics worshipped Jesus. Although we do have the tomb of the Roman soldier Tiberius Pantera who Celsus says is Jesus's father so maybe there really was a bastard Nazarene who made a religion.
>>538671953>ignores thread>pushes talmud propaganda Oy vey!
>>538670741kek tik tok kike
>>538671953>jesus did not exist. but if he did, his father was panthera. and if he wasn't, then jesus was a jew.and let me guess, "jesus was asexual, but if he wasn't, then he was homosexual, and if he wasn't a homosexual, then he was a child molester"
>>538670505I agree, good idea but probably still not good enough to filter out all the retards.
>>538670627Retarded reply cause most atheists doesn't even deny the existence of Jesus. (Although they should, cause the evidence is massive cope and mostly just depend of "trust me bro Paul" and Tacitus who simply states what Christians believe in.)
