Darwin literally ruined science and the theory of evolution has so many holes it might be regarded as a somewhat plausible guess, though misdirected.
>>538737967>the theory of evolution has so many holessuch as what?
>>538738034Abiogenesis. If they can't get their heads around this, I'm not going to subscribe to their little theory.
It's a wide issue. You must consider biology, chemistry, physics, philosophy, math, history, languages, geography, astrophysics, metaphysics, esotericism, etc. Or you can just read John. You pick.
>>538738034There just isn’t enough time. Every step of the way is basically a miracle and there are countless steps to take.
>>538737967until someone proves it wrong, it's still science
>>538738325How about prove it right lmao
>>538737967calling it misdirected is a huge understatement.darwinian "theory" relies heavily on closed system assumptions and gradualist timescales.if you factor in non equilibrium thermodynamics life is a dissipative structure driving entropy production.biological complexity arises because systems far from equilibrium organize themselves to maximize energy flux, meaning evolution can happen via rapid, non linear phase transitions rather than just "slow luck".also once you integrate plasma cosmology/electric universe principles the biological driver changes entirely.we are living inside a massive, complex electromagnetic field.the cellular level operates on bio electromagnetism, driven by external plasma discharges and atmospheric electrical gradients during planetary formation or times of stellar upheaval.evolution basically isnt just survival of the fittest but the systemic adaptation of organized matter to intense electromagnetic energetic inputs.the darwin jew nepobaby retard missed this spark because he didnt know how electricity drives complex morphology.
>>538738373has been proven experimentally, the entire pharma industry depends on it to manufacture drugs by forced evolution of bacteria through altering their environmentmight as well say "prove Coulomb's Law" while typing on an iPhone
>>538737967>theory of evolution>>538738090>AbiogenesisHow old are you when you were dropped on your head? How is creation mythos a hole in evolution?
>>538738373jewish science is built around jews being right. the whole world will rearrange if it had to prove that einstein was right. they will change the meaning of up to down.
Bot or glownigger thread?Is there a difference really?
>>538737967>somewhat plausible guessNot even lol.Some of the insanely danning and overlooked objections completely renders evolution invalid. Something from nothing. A miracle. No scientific hold. Or; eternal physical world. Again flies against everything we know about science. Chemical evolution. How did the elements evolve from the "initial" hydrogen? Why did elements stop evolving from hydrogen and other elements? Makes zero sense. Life from non life? Why can't we recreate it? Because it's impossible. Obviously. Co-dependancy everywhere you look in the natural world. How evolution continue if a boy evolve without a girl evolving at the same time and place. How can there be blood without a hear without organs to need blood. Makes no sense. How come new information in DNA never appear? How come we never see evolution happen? Because it's not happening obviously. They say we can't see it because it takes a long time. Time actually works against the whole theory, because when "evolution" actually happens, the co-dependency kicks in and it needs everything else to evolve at the same time. It just doesn't make any sense at all. Only adaptation is true, but that's simply existing species adapting. God made us. Deal with it.
>>538738421also a perfect case study for this is the wallace line.while conventional jew biologists argue about rising sea levels and land bridges they ignore this much more potent driver.large scale planetary electrical discharges.Its highly probable that these geological rifts arent just tectonic but were carved/enhanced by massive plasma discharges or electrical scarring.this leads to the core mechanism of rapid speciation: electromagnetic genomic induction, when the surrounding environment undergoes intense electrical fluctuations driven by shifts in the earths magnetic field or atmospheric plasma activity it creates high energy gradients across cellular membranes.these surges drive structured non linear changes in DNA/RNA expression through bioelectric signaling.once the local frequency normalizes after a discharge event the genetic code "locks" into its new morphological state.this explains why we see sudden dramatic jumps in biodiversity at specific geographical boundaries rather than a slow continuous transition. this also explains why every animal is adapted to its surroundings and why so many different species exist.
>>538738090organic compounds forming from inorganic ones under natural conditions is well understoodI can elaborate if you contest this point, but I don't think I need toorganic compounds forming emergent and homeostatic self-organising systems is well understood and is demonstrablelook at Belousov-Zhabotinsky for an example of self-organisation in a homeostatic system of even INORGANIC compoundsthen we can view something simple like soap micelles, which self-organise to form little spheres out of lipid molecules which have one hydrophobic end, and one hydrophilic endthat's how soap works to trap and remove non-water-soluble thingsso we can demonstrate organic chemistry self-assembling into membrane-bound sphereswe can also demonstrate them forming two-layer spheres, making a thin polar membrane of two layers of lipid molecules, identical to the cell membranes of almost all organismsand it goes on like this - inorganic parts assemble into organic parts, and organic parts assemble into higher-order structuresand as our understanding has progressed, we've gone on to make a series of increasingly-complex synthetic cellsin the '60s, the 'Jeewanu' was made, which although primitive had "some metabolic capabilities, the presence of semipermeable membrane, amino acids, phospholipids, carbohydrates and RNA-like molecules"more recently, we've been able to produce semi-synthetic cells from separated and purified higher-order components made of organic chemicals (which could be produced completely synthetically, because it's just chemistry after all) - and these are capable of feeding, growing, and replicating
>>538738034Observed and maximum possible fixation rate is not compatible with the current model that is assumed to be correct.
>>538739075Organic compounds being formed naturally is no where close to an explanation of abiogenesis. However your examples are interesting and I was unaware, thank you.
>>538738421>>538739059based and alternative theory pilled>>538738090>>538738207>>538738895cringe and christcuck pilled
>>538739163I don't think that - even if valid - that's a criticism of a magnitude whereby we'd have to call in question the entire theory of evolution by natural selectionthe theory encompasses many different models, which are you talking about?and is your criticism of the model, or the underlying theory?
>>538738895>Something from nothing.its not from "nothing", its a gradual buildup.>No scientific holdnon equilibrium thermodynamics and the structured atom model are very scientific tho.>How did the elements evolve from the "initial" hydrogen?the r-process (rapid neutron capture process) and the the s-process (slow neutron capture process).>Why did elements stop evolving from hydrogen and other elements?a Z-pinch doesnt take all that long and tops out at Europium.>How come we never see evolution happen?because it requires massive electric discharges aka cataclysmic sized events. they happen every couple thousand years or so or used to happen more frequently in the past.
>>538739240>Organic compounds being formed naturally is no where close to an explanation of abiogenesiswhat makes you think me mentioning that was intended to be taken as a holistic argument?I was starting at the start
>>538738421So your incredibly strained point is that electrical and thermodynamic behavior somehow dictates biological behavior to the point that it can disregard causal entropic flow within a system?Either that or (more charitably) you're describing punctuated equilibrium like it's some sort of secret that scientists don't already recognize as a part of evolutionary theory.
>>538737967Pressure forms and folds. Once you understand this it's easy to see how cells would mutate with all the pressures of existence. It's also easy to see how life began. It's like madness. Sometimes all you need is a little push.
>>538739385LOL nice retard posting but, aren't you forgetting something ?
>>538739285>gets told to deal with it>refuses to deal with it.God will sort you out. Very tragic what awaits you.
>>538739522punctuated equilibrium is just a descriptive observation waiting for a cause.meanwhile my model provides the causality.
>>538739604like what?
>>538739373It is a valid criticism. If you construct a model, and it mathmatically isn't compatible with observed data, then the model is not sufficient. For instance, based on the current model, it isn't mathmatically possible for humans to share a common ancestor with chimpanzees. The difference in genetic data, the maximum possible fixation rate along with the current timeline of events are all wildly off. There are absolutely unknown unknowns that could explain this, but this is still inherently a problem that biologists have snubbed their noses to, and evolution is proudly stated as a fact yet the work isn't close to being done>>538739466The jeewanu thing at the end at a cursory glance looks to be unreplicated jeetslop, but I will need to read more about it because I have never heard of it before. The rest of the post was about organic compounds forming shapes similar to ones found in biotic structures, but that's still a huge leap. It would be like explaining that houses are made by trees being torn apart by a tornado, getting ripped and cut up in a perfect way, and falling exactly as you need to because one time you saw a tornado make 4 trees fall and leave behind a square pattern.
>>538739643God and your mythology are just later offshoots of early jewish efforts to explain the natural world while also primitively attempting to justify their actions against other tribes as divine right.>>538739863So you ultimately spent a lot of words on the extraordinary revelation that electromagnetic fields can influence DNA/RNA. Which doesn't contradict darwinian theory for the same reasons it doesn't contradict punctuated equilibrium.
>>538738090https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/scientists-say-theyve-made-cells-that-feed-grow-and-reproduce-bringing-them-one-step-closer-to-building-life-from-scratch-180989070/
>>538739075>organic compounds forming from inorganic ones under natural conditions is well understoodProvide a single example of absolute 0 bacteria or any single organsm existing in something and it creating life you fucking idiot. Soap is organic you pathetically retarded cattle faggot.
>>538740227>smithsonianHave you ever been to that museum? It's just school projects on a larger scale to display THEORY. They don't discuss facts.
>>538740192that is a very lazy way of looking at it.saying it doesn't contradict darwinism is like saying an internal combustion engine doesnt contradict a horse drawn carriage, it fundamentally changes the mechanism of movement.standard darwinian jew loser theory relies on stochasticity (randomness) through minute genetic drift over millions of years.my model replaces that randomness with deterministic electromagnetic drivers.so I'm not talking about minor biochemical fluctuations, these are large scale plasma discharge events that force rapid phase transitions in dissipative structures over a very short amount of time.basically dumbfuck jew darwinism provides a statistical probability of survival and my model provides the physical impulse for complexity. you and the darwin jew are describing/thinking the world is governed by luck.and I'm describing a world governed by physics.also do you happen to be jewish?
>>538739059>electromagnetic genomic induction,Good bait, please explain the egg. maggot cocon butterfly egg cycle within that biotectonic megaarcing phenomena.
>>538738090Abiogenesis has to be true, so nobody bothers investigating it. Kind of a circular reasoning thing.
>>538739075But unfortunately thats creation at work. You just show that live forming is integrated in this world wich nullifies any selection/mutation cycles and raises the question who put it there before anything "starts".
>>538740379>basically dumbfuck jew darwinism provides a statistical probability of survival and my model provides the physical impulse for complexity.So now it amounts to the revelation that mutation instead of genetic drift is the primary driver for evolution? All you've done is describe a single one of the myriad factors that go into causing a nucleotide to flip, postulated that it must be the primary impetus of all such occurances, and asserted that this comprises a fundamental contradiction of the concept of darwinian adaptation.
>>538740552its scaling and not bait.the principle remains identical from a macro level down to a cellular electrochemical gradient.an insects metamorphosis is essentially a series of rapid programmed phase transitions facilitated by controlled shifts in bio electrical potential.during the transition from larva to pupa the organism undergoes massive tissue remodeling.this is effectively a period of high metabolic energy flux where the system moves through a non equilibrium state to reorganize its entire structure.the developmental cues for these cycles are dictated by environmental electromagnetic signatures (the frequency) which trigger specific hormonal cascades via ion channel regulation within cells.basically metamorphosis is a highly localized version of the same dissipative restructuring seen in larger systems.its matter reorganizing itself to optimize energy processing under changing electrical conditions.>>538740805I explained why the whole system undergoes a massive reorganization at specific intervals rather than just waiting for accidental flicks over millions of years.also I noticed you forgot to answer my question, are you jewish?
>>538738895>How evolution continue if a boy evolve without a girl evolving at the same time and place. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnisogamyIt was a gradual process where some parts of a species specialized in creating larger and more durable gametes, and some specialized in creating smaller and faster mobile gametes. Eventually reaching a point where these two groups became distinct sexes. >How can there be blood without a hear without organs to need blood. Makes no sense.Many species use a fluid medium to transfer oxygen and food to cells without using a heart, and sometimes not even having distinct organs. Blood is a specialized version of a very primitive system.
>>538737967Yes, natural life may have evolved, but humans were created by the Annunaki by splicing together the DNA of a Grey Alien and a Bigfoot
>>538740953Okay, now tell me who wrote that seqences because none of the stages of the butterfly has reducible complexity
>>538740953>I explained why the whole system undergoes a massive reorganization at specific intervals rather than just waiting for accidental flicks over millions of years.I was going to point out that this has nothing to do with my point, but>the developmental cues for these cycles are dictated by environmental electromagnetic signatures (the frequency) which trigger specific hormonal cascades via ion channel regulation within cells.Nigger are you legitimately claiming that "environmental electromagnetic signatures" are what causes metamorphosis? I thought you were talking about "energy flux" in the sense that life is fundamentally chemical reactions that have developed a sophisticated means of perpetuating and protecting themselves, not whatever the fuck this is.There are experiments demonstrating that butterflies can successfully go through their entire life cycle in space. Your bizarre claims about dependence on electromagnetic cycles hold no water whatsoever.
>>538741577Having that descussion for more than two decades and can report that the wordsalat not ment to explain something but to impress and distract you while keeping you busy. But, i must admit, usually its boring. Biotectonic is really new to me and a fascinating science area the state should though money in.
>>538738090Abiogenesis and evolution are two different things. Although i do agree about abiogenesis. Picrel.
>>538741806>You haven't demonstrated it by experiment yet, so it must've been my Jewish lava demon who did it!Even if you were poking holes in evolution, it wouldn't make your religion plausible.
I still don't get how even well educated people tries to navigate around evolution due to being religious.They don't accept the full nature of it, but would probably be perfectly fine accepting each part that makes it up. Like:1) Nature is not a perfect copy-pasting machine. Living things produce offspring with differences.2) Slight differences can give slight competitive advantages.3) Time. Cumulative small changes can make for big changes given enough time passing.
>>538741934> your religionShoo, binary npc bot.
>>538740783unfortunate?if the view is that natural selection is a process emergent from a created system, then neither is mutually-exclusiveif a progression creationism DOES raise the question of who (or what) set the fundamental constants such that naturally selective processes would emerge, then the question isn't relevant to the validity of the existence of the processes, and it also lies WELL outside of the remit of the science, which seeks only to describe the material world, not explain the reason for it existingbut an issue which crops up with the progressive creationism you describe is that it often DOESN'T raise the question of a creator like you claim - actually it typically starts with the pre-existing religious view (i.e. Abrahamic), and attempts to incorporate the scientific evidence without invalidating the religious part - it's not always intellectually honestit can be though - I believe in God, and I think natural selection as a process describes the emergence and self-sustenance of a multitude of viable systems - I just don't presume anything about God which I can't argue for a priori (so Abrahamism is right out)we can't in good faith argue that the emergence of naturally-selective processes was the *intent* of setting the constants such that they are, only that it was an effect
>>538741758I agree biotectonics is shaping up to be a valid discipline, but not that it's the end all be all of life like anon is claiming.>>538741934I believe there's an appropriate allegory here regarding a teapot in orbit.
>>538737967>>538738034>>538738090>>538738207>>538738249real scientists have already solved this. jews are not going to tell you about it on the tv or in the kiked education system. hybridization is much more common than believed in darwins day. have fun coming to terms with the fact you are the descendent of a monkey pig hybrid. https://www.macroevolution.net/
>>538741961This in theory, but nature uses the principle of opulence. There is not a single defect that will not return to the big stream of that desired species in a few generations. Most people think like there is some family tree, but its a big net where one individual is just a small knot in the almost endless stream of life.
>>538741511I thought we were a crossbreed of pigs and chimps?
>>538742037>sMan god(s) created the world and the devil the religions. There is absolute no need to cite one of them.
>>538741527nobody had to write it, complexity isnt built it emerges.
>>538741577how come you cant answer my question if you are jewish or not? I'm starting to suspect you are jewish.also chemical reactions are nothing more than electron transfers mediated by electrostatic forces.you cannot have biochemistry without electromagnetism and suggesting otherwise is like saying you can have movement without momentum. everything in my model is subatomic physics expressed through biological systems.also your "space experiment" rebuttal is adorable but fundamentally flawed.the fact that a butterfly survives in microgravity/low EM environments only proves it has an internal mechanism for homeostasis.it does not prove it isnt responding to electromagnetic cues.basically being able to survive in a desert doesnt mean the animal doesnt rely on rain or sunlight to regulate its lifecycle.its funny you think this is bizarre but what’s actually bizarre is your assumption that life exists as a closed chemical system independent of the planetary electrical environment.
>>538742304>god(s) created the world and the devil the religionsergo god(s) created the religions by proxy of the devil it/they also createdthe problem of syncretically incorporating primitive superstition into your beliefs is that you inherit the contradictions of the primitive thinkers who devised the superstitions
>>538742455>nobody had to write it, complexity isnt built it emerges.Sue guy thats why irreducibility isnt observed. But just do it, show me how an egg tht will! procuce a chicken can do it with your arbitrary sequences.
>538742625Yeah, no. Fuck off, pseud.
>>538742731Why should they not only set a frame and enact some laws? Me (a little lazy) would exactly do that and let the things flow. If you meddle too much wich your creation it just costs nerves and makes work.
>>538741527There are many more primitive forms of metamorphosis in living insects than what we see in butterflies.
>>538737967>holesit doesnt its one of the most verfied theories that even exist and we can literally see it happening in realtime with basically all living things that lets us monitor in real time (easier with fast living and dying organisms for obvious reason) your stupidity is not the rest of the worlds problem, its your problem
Go to Harvard youtube school and look into perception studies, thereis a women there who is literally the most blindly beautiful women in existance, like the primordeal source or femininity and she is a twin.
>>538743006>metamorphosis Just show how they build up in evolution and how and why they are stored (total unecessary at the time point and unaccountable in that theory).
>>538742761>jew got butthurtI accept your concession.>>538742745that is a fundamentally illiterate way to ask a question.and you arent really asking about the mechanism you are asking for a magic trick.im certainly not claiming metamorphosis or evolution happens instantly in a vacuum, I am explaining the physical impetus that dictates the speed, direction, and structural limit of those transitions.you want to see it?look at any cellular differentiation process under a microscope during rapid embryonic development.the ion channels are firing, the voltage gates are opening/closing and the bio electric field is actively sculpting the tissue architecture via electrochemical signaling.that is the sequence.if you cant bridge the gap between subatomic electron movement and macro scale morphological change then maybe you are just retarded.>>538742911no imaginary jew god is needed for any of the processes we see in the universe.
>>538737967Show me a single fossil of a prehistoric animal that Darwin found on the galapagos islands. His evidence for his theory only ever concerned itself with micro evolution.He extrapolated that into macro evolution with no evidence. Freemasons did everything in their power to platform his ideas. Their network successfully spread his message because they have a vested interest in attacking Christianity. That was the only reason shit like abiogenesis, the geologic column, and other earth "science" nonsense made it out of their demonic gentlemen's club. Every single contribution that we view as accepted science on the matter has nothing supporting it.
>>538742745I mean, if you really care an egg just boils down to a phase where the lifeform is rapidly developing but is incapable of protecting or sustaining itself. If it's likely that it can do so without dying (such as say, being in the vicinity of a creature that provides safety and sustenance in the form of heat), having such a phase within its life cycle becomes a valid direction of development because it allows for a period of rapid maturation that doesn't inhibit the parent as greatly as being directly connected to the parent would (like with pregnant humans).This could hypothetically emerge via increasingly helpless and sedentary early states that developed a dependence on preexisting security and warmth in exchange for rapid development, with the shell emerging later as an offshoot of a protective "carapace" against minor damage from the environment.
>>538743324>that is a fundamentally illiterate way to ask a question.Ok, but have a nice day
>>538743761I accept your concession.
>>538743403>His evidence for his theoryIronically he stole that from another guy and there are a lot of hints his journeys were fake.
>>538743662Have you read that yourself? It's a bunch of total ass pulled assumptions that only shows a cope mechanism. But ok, i am bored, so youre right and have a nice day.
>>538743786Thanks
>>538743218Why would a creature metamorphosize? Because the idea that you'd want to just get bigger as you grew is not all that logical. A baby deer is strictly a worse version of an adult deer. A caterpillar is not strictly worse than a butterfly.Having different forms as you grow makes a lot of sense. Many insects only do their final metamorphosis when they need to reproduce, and some don't even have the ability to feed at this point. It isn't coincidental that many of the earliest examples of true metamorphosis we see in insects occurs in species that go from aquatic to aerial, like dragonflies. This tracks with how flight itself developed - the earliest insect wings were likely paddles for swimming that only later became wings.
>>538743968The question was how to explain that metamorphosis within theory of evolution. But as said i am bored of the circlejerk. So have a nice day.
>>538738249>miracleNo not really at all
>>538738090How does that contradict evolution at all
>>538737967You are actually braindead if you don't understand how evolution can be observed in real time and apply magical thinking to the whole concept so you don't have to confront the fact that there is no equality in nature
>>538744138https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214574524001317I don't care what you're bored of, because you're a moron.
>>538739075Are you aware that organic/inorganic chemistry is fake division? We have here vis vitalis retard here. Yeah lipids organize themselves, what else is magical abiogenesis vodoo? Mixing of alcohol and water, water and oil separating from each other? All those process are well known and not single of them leads to creation of life.
>>538740227>claimsYou know how much articles using that word worth?
Wasn't Darwin a freemason?
>>538741934I can believe in time travel more than in abiogenesis. We are living in times in which you can build robot and program it. Similiarity between programmed robot and biolife is uncanny, both have software and hardware but no one believes that robot could evolve naturally.
>>538745845yes the Darwins were top freemasons. charles grandfather erasmus was one of the high ranking masons in the british isles, being head of the time immemorial Lodge, #2 in scotland. also this erasmus guy was married to a Howard, yes these Howards, first cousins of the Stuarts: Earls of Suffolk, Earls of Berkshire, and Dukes of Norfolk, these are top peerage jew cucks.also of interest is that erasmus father Robert Darwin of Elston was the first to find a dinosaur bone.What are the odds, eh?one guy is the first to find a dinosaur, and his great grandson is the one who popularizes Evolution.
>>538738325Einstein did get a lot of shit wrong and the stuff he got right he stole from people like Poincaré.
>>538746200I don't know the HowardsOr the stuarts, but the thing about his great grandfather is interesting ,also his son (Charles Darwin)was a freemason iirc
>>538746456really? you never heard of the Peerage and the jews that run it?
>>538746567>Peerage and the jews that run itLike I heard of Alot of shit, radhites, ottoman and Arab slavery of whites by Jews, Bavarian illuminati, masonry, Dutch indian trade companies, etc etcBut nah
>>538738034Survival of the fittest implies domination and brute force succeeds but actually cooperation is the driving factor of evolution as outlined by Carl Sagans wife
bump
>>538738249Like a few billion years kinda time?
>>538750558Care to share?
>>538751183share what?
>>538751257> the Peerage and the jews that run it?
>>538737967Evolutionary psychology and social anthropology. It’s all fiction yet treated like science. All you have to do is be part of the academia cult and then publish some well cited works of fiction citing the previously accepted works of fiction. Then boom whatever you say is fact
>>538739240All you really need is a single replicator that survives long enough to replicate and suddenly you've got the pathway to life.
>>538746866Genetic fitness refers to an animal's ability to reproduce by any means, midwit.>>538741446I feel like these concepts are easy to grasp if you study organisms like flatworms. You can see how basic structures that improve mobility in an aquatic environment can be bootstrapped into more complex organs (i.e. swim bladder -> lungs).
>>538751548I thought you werent interested but basically the Peerage refers to the highest tier of titled nobility in britain, you know like the aristocracy. like the Kang of England, you heard about that guy right?and these arent just your average rich fag jews, these are massive dynasties like the Howards, the Stanleys, Stuarts etc. (there are a shitload of them) and they run this for hundreds of years.These top families basically own all the land, all the industries, all the banks, all of the media and have concentrated political power for centuries. basically every famous person you see in the media belongs to the peerage.
>>538738895>overlooked objections completely renders evolution invalidNot a chance. Evolution is literally just how things change over time. Only way to render it invalid is if time stopped passing altogother>Something from nothingHas nothing to do with evolution. However, it is what theists claim about their god.> A miracle. No scientific hold. Or; eternal physical world.The fuck are you talking about?>Chemical evolutionCarbon can chain with itself infinitely, allowing for limitless complexity.>How did the elements evolve from the "initial" hydrogen?Go outside and take a look at that bright, round thing in the sky>Why did elements stop evolving from hydrogen and other elements?Any understanding of radioactivity would demonstrate how retarded your question is
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01620-3 >The long-term evolution experiment (LTEE) has become a cornerstone in evolutionary biology that researchers continue to mine for insights. During their 75,000 generations of growth, the bacteria have made huge gains in their fitness — how fast they grow relative to other bacteria — and evolved some surprising traits. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JB.00831-15 >The LTEE isolation of Cit+ mutants has become a textbook example of the power of long-term evolution to generate new species. But, based on our results, E. coli arrives at the same solution to access citrate in days versus years, as originally shown by Hall. In either case, genes involved in the process maintain their same function but show expanded expression by deregulation. Because of this, we argue that this is not speciation any more than is the case with any other regulatory mutant of E. coli. We conclude that the rarity of the LTEE mutant was an artifact of the experimental conditions and not a unique evolutionary event. No new genetic information (novel gene function) evolved. >No new genetic information evolved.
>>538743403This distinction between "micro evolution" and "macro evolution" isn't a thing. That comes from your own mind. It is just the same
>>538744220Wow, I guess that anon was wrong. Thank you for saying something. You people are fucking retards.
>>538752498Ai frogposter is here to explain why all the evolutionary scientists are wrongOh wait you didn't argue any more than he did
>>538752580Yep, I'm not about to make a long rambling post that no one will read. You want me to waste my time but I'm just not going to do it, that's all.
The theory of evolution provides the intellectual defense for every right wing thing. From strong families, to cultural values, to eugenics and racial differences.Yet the right invests time and energy attacking that, and attacking their own heritage of scientific inquiry. And for what? The childish, infantile story of Noah's ark. The animals on the boat. The 6000 year earth....etc. It's time to grow up, enough of you children
>>538752479Saying that a father passes his blue eyes on to his kid or a turtle passes on his angular fins to his child does not corelate to a tadpole turning into a dog after x amount of generations. X being hundreds of thousands to millions of pass throughs and changes. That isn't observable. It is not scientifically sound. Even if you think it is logically relevant IT IS NOT. The two terms need to be separated. They are discussing two entirely separate functions.
>>538754015>saying that taking one step and climbing a mountain are two different things. You can take one step but climbing a mountain is impossible
>>538737967it was made up to destroy christianity; and to get people to move away from God and his laws so they could destroy you. the jews. it is all political; even today much of science is political and the truth hidden and not allowed to be traught....the truth... mankind was genetically engineered in a lab by extraterrestrials to be primitive workers on this planet; and they made a plan for mankind.... and that plan was written down in the bible. at least the last parts.also, it is like a game; they gave moses all the laws you are suppose to obey... no lgbt, not amalek (jews), no whores (feminist) you are suppose to kill those people... if you do not obey the laws given to moses/mankind by the exterterrestrials, you will be cursed; doomed to be exterminated in nuclear war. which is what is happening now...the jews know this... and have striven for centuries to get you away from god and the laws, so you will be cursed, and they could take over the earth; not believing god will redeem jacob and destroy the earth.in 2019, the messiah was anointed; the jews know this; and they started their plan of attack/defence... this is called the tribulation in the bible; when the jews take over everything and fuck everything up; which leads to the end of this world. because they are too stupid to even conceive that they are being played.freedom begins, the new world begin; after the jews are exterminated and eliminated; totally.this is god's plan; his plan to get rid of all the evil in this world.the jew mind is an evil mind.it is their genetics which need to be eliminated.
>>538743073No you stupid nigger retard, this is the least falsifiable theory ever. You probably believe man landed on the moon and got your covid vaccine for a donut. You faggots are so unbelievably stupid
>>538755929We used the principles of evolution to create crops, dog breeds, animal breeds. We turned an aurok into a cow.
>>538755220There is no equivalency.
Fun fact - humans and most animals evolved from creatures that at one point of their evolution did a 180 turn so our mouths are our former asses. Skin on anus is same as on lips. When embryo develops you can observe that switch, everything just turns 180 degrees at some point because at first older genes try to build older form.
>>538737967Zero content, thread dropped, try posting about science with more than your earnest beliefs next time fag
doesnt science mean you do experiments to prove your theory? evolution is the equivalent of the theory that semen comes from the brain because gooners are stupid
>>538757009just checked with chat gpt, and it concluded that its generally considered not scientific. interesting
>>538738090suppose a pebble makes a dent in some mud. later the pebble washes or gets blown out, of the dried mud. Then the hole fills with sediment which forms a new pebble, which eventually washes out onto another spot of the now wet mud and creates a dent, then washes out and that hole fills with sediment.
>>538738034It's too difficult for stupid people to understand, that's its main flaw.
