>Christianity weaker than ever>Liberalism is the religion of the entire west>It's heroes: George Floyd, MLK, the boy that shot Zimmerman >Entrenched everywhere in pop culture>Get cancelled and basically sent to homelessness if you're a heretic>Won't get removed by normal means aloneHow can liberalism be killed permanently? At this point, I think it would require the entire collapse of the West to defeat it but even then there will be remnants of it here and there. There needs to be a complete and thorough washing of it like you would a termite infested household. There will be history books chronicling how people believed in this crazy religion and the kids will be like "wtf people actually believed in that stuff?"I don't think voting is a viable option to destroy liberalism.
>>538747723Y'know I wonder how you'd feel if you'd gotten laid when you were a teen.So much right and leftwing craziness is just sexlessness.
>>538747723Christianity isn't going to do anything about Liberalism.The reason why we have Liberalism and Secularism to begin with is dissatisfaction with Christianity.Doubling down on Christcuckery is only going to rebound people back into being Liberals.
>>538747723Just fucking do it you pussy
>>538747864I wonder how you would feel if you weren't a faggot.
>>538747723This is what our Founding Fathers wanted thoughbeit
>>538747723It's a well guarded secret, but basically the solution is [REDACTED].
>>538747723Trump was supposed to the backlash but he's too retarded to be effective. But yeah, that was our chance and we staked it all on a con man New York faggy tv host
>>538749442Sad
>>538747953>dissatisfactionThat's not quite the right word, or maybe the "Christianity" part isn't the right word.>is there such a thing as Christianity and if so what is it?Bring me a guy from 200AD, 800AD, 1200AD, 1600AD, 1800AD, 1900AD and 2000AD and they won't agree on anything.Gets even worse if we factor in the different denominations in the modern day - which however IS a rather modern problem. The old Catholics and Orthodox and Copts didn't disagree on that much, mainly some fine details; mostly a couple of sects that stepped well out of line, until the Reformation and Christian revivals, that is, although even the Reformation initially was quite restrained; Luther didn't even want to cause a schism, just compromise and reform, to purge the Church of genuinely repulsive or questionable practices, but it grew well out of hand, not least because Catholics insisted on doing things their way and their way only, hardening the camps on the other side as well.Would be quite convenient if it was in fact binary.>either have Christianity or do not have ChristianityMuch the same with the Enlightenment. It being half-assed or wishy-washy is a central part of the issue, instead of being one thing and one thing only with iron resolve, at the exclusion of over things.Could be simplified into saying: the lack of cohesion is critical, or by extension: individualism, even if one particular thing taken to an extreme would not be perfect either - at least it maintains a certain uniformity, which is something you can work with.Diversity is not something you can work with, and one of the biggest psyops of the modern age.
>>538749442>Trump was supposed to the backlashwutI mean yeah some people unironically believed that, but that's not terribly meaningful. There never was any indication Trump would "roll back" liberalism - especially considering he's a libertarian (con man, as you said) of sorts, and the Democratic/Republican factionalism totally misses the point.The things that he was willing to attack are just fringe issues not central to the actual problem, and it'a questionable whether any POTUS could fix anything of this sort or magnitude. To begin with it requires significant changes to the constitution, system of government and economy.>the foundations are rottenBut what is he supposed to do?He can curtail immigration somewhat, ensure law and order is maintained, fight corruption, sure, and I'm not saying he does these things, but you quickly arrive at the limits of his capabilities or constitutional powers no matter what.This isn't something one man can fix, or ten, or a hundred - at least not without extreme measures.
>>538747723Classical Liberalism is dead, and the Founding Fathers were Classical Liberalists. The Age of Enlightenment ended with the Internet.We are in the real Dark Ages and our taxpayer money is being used for everything except homeland and citizen defense. Crazy Times, crazy times, crazy times indeed.This is why blessing those who want us dead, like the people who pay for and operate the Panopticon want us as mindles slaves to keep their blood lines as our rulers in this next phase.Since the Pentagon doesnt work for the American People, it works against the American People, Crazy times right?All thats left is Christ and your locality, that and constant confession, repentence and communion, as its the only way to get called out of this fake and gay fallen world.Christianty that falls was not Christianity to begin with as Logic would heal the soul, not divide it for political reasons, or magic sand, or magic parchment reasons. So many gods, but Big Pharma told us demons were not real, and to trust them instead, divorce Truth and Christ and modify your human form to live forever, just like the gods, and the blackbloods, the ones who understood the context we are not allowed to, because we are poor unwashed masses, beasts of burden.Christ says that we were created in Gods Image.The Panopticon says we are random chemicals that are enslaved in debt to other random chemicals and those chemicals have heros like Floyds chemicals et al.Yet Christ chemicals which cannot be studied are ignored, so all holistic approach can be removed from medicine. All thats left is insurance and profit.We prepare for the death of the US Military and the collapse of the corrupt fed by helping our locality and prepare it for the result of their nonAmerican rule.Conversations and Relatioships and Prayers will heal more than any banker elected Panopticon Manager.
>>538747723Its supported by the elites and those in the dominant social positions, movies, music academia. The goys simply follow who they submit to. Remove those elites from power and liberalism crumbles.
>>538750506While "removing" them is a good idea in general - removing them from existence - you also need something else to take their place, meaning it's not a real solution to this particular issue. For that it would even be sufficient to simply destroy their levers of power, but again: something has to exert the controlling power over normies, in some form or other.>not that I would encourage this approach"Removal" it is.Not least because that has a certain educational quality.>fuck shit up>get "removed">successor more reluctant to fuck up>gets "removed" anyway because obviously he fucked up>shieeeet maybe fucking things up is bad
>>538750239Classical liberalism was actually killed in the 1830's by feminists and trade unionists that wanted state planning in England or something. At the same time you had Whigs in the Midwest building bridges to nowhere with essentially the same belief system as the communist Chinese "if you build it, they will come" and throwing champagne and caviar parties and bankrupting the entire region. So who are these factions, a bunch of morons? They all call themselves "liberals"
>>538750991To be fair being retarded and tolerant of the retarded (as well as nepotists, pedophiles, niggers, etc) is pretty liberal.>that retarded nepotist billionaire tax-evader pedo nigger-lover is just as much a worthy human as you are also he's a woman
>>538752894Kek>>538750864Smart anon here.
Begin with stopping calling a jewish rebrand of frankfurt-school communism a "liberalism", it has nothing to do with ideas of John Locke
