Not a single new mechanoreceptor is regenerated during foreskin restoration because mechanoreceptors lack the ability to divide through mitosisYou can try restoring yourself but it is not some ultimate solution when the skin you're growing has limited to none of the fine touch sensation as a native foreskin. None of the specialized nerve endings are able to be regrown. A "regrown" foreskin is actually just "extra skin". It's better than nothing, but you should definitely hope for an advanced regenerative solution one day becoming available and that it doesn’t involve evil animal testing/torture.Regardless of if a full and ethical restoration technology becomes free and widely available tomorrow or in ten years reparations are owed to men circumcised as baby boys for all the years they have had to live as mutilated men. I was circumcised as a baby boy right after being born. From talking to both of my parents it seems that my mother wanted it done for hygiene reasons and my father did not want it done and said something like wait until he‘s 16 so he can decide f himself but then he eventually said okay but numb it first and then I was circumcised. she was incorrect about the benefits of circumcision because studies back then and now show it has almost no effect on preventing infections in the future. But that’s not necessarily a lie / willful falsehood she said considering she literally has brain damage. The problem is my dad was and still is a weak coward. They ended up getting divorced less then a decade (can’t blame him if he initiated but may have been more her idea) later anyways so compromising and appeasement on issues like this is never worth it.Men and boys are explicitly discriminated against because they are not protected from mgm and also have no real recourse if it is done to them. men literally should be able to sue the doctors and nurses responsible for cutting them as a baby just as fgm victims can.
>>538762130The federal laws and almost all state laws in the United States treat baby girls being circumcised very differently than baby boys being circumcised. It’s probably one of the clearest examples of misandry https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/circumcision-oregon-lawsuit-male-genital-b2725383.htmlSeveral men circumcised at birth are suing the state of Oregon for allegedly “stealing” their bodily autonomy while also arguing that a current genital mutilation law discriminates against boysCalifornia-based attorney Eric Clopper filed the lawsuit last week on behalf of Cecil Mininger and his teenage son, as well as brothers Carter and Landon Moody, in Multnomah County Circuit Court in Portland. The plaintiffs all had their foreskins surgically removed as infants within the state, according to the filingThe 76-page document alleges that boys have been neglected by the state and asks for equal protection under a law that bans female genital mutilation. The current law, it says, which only protects women from genital cutting, is a violation of the state constitution’s Equal Rights Amendment and Equal Protection Clause.The suit urges the court to either ban genital cutting procedures for children of any gender or overturn the statute entirely.However, the suit argues that victims of male genital cutting could sue their circumcisers. It claimed that the procedure has become “medicalized” in the U.S. but provides few health benefits and inhibits healthy sexual function.“This lawsuit is about one simple, urgent principle: equal protection under the law,” Clopper, who founded Intact Global, a non-profit that says it stands against non-religious genital mutilation that is funding the suit, wrote in a statement on the organization’s website Friday.“If Oregon protects girls from non-consensual genital cutting, it must protect boys and intersex children too. Anything less is unconstitutional.”
>>538762165What the fuck is female circumcision. What do you fucking chop? The clit off?
>>538762165>you can’t be upset at the doctors for doing a medical procedure that your parents asked them to do :( i’m sorry it happened to you but that’s on your parents, not the doctors.>also, it is not misandry that female circumcision is treated differently than male circumcision. female circumcision involves removing the clitoris, which would be the equivalent of removing the head of the penis. it’s not skinI can be upset at the doctors, nurses, politicians and my parents for the same reason a woman who was circumcised as a girl can Under United States federal law and the laws of the vast majority of U.S. states, all non-medical alterations of the female genitalia are illegal for minors, regardless of how minor, less invasive, or minimal the tissue alteration is (Goldberg et al., 2016; Thomas, 2023).This includes procedures that do not remove the clitoris, remove only small amounts of skin, or remove significantly less tissue and structure than standard male infant circumcision.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606106/#:~:text=Type%20III%20is%20further%20subclassified,and%20menstrual%20outflow.%5B4%5DU.S. federal law (18 U.S. Code § 116) and nearly 40 state-level statutes specifically structure their bans to encompass alltypes, including Type IV (Thomas, 2023). The federal statute applies broadly to anyone who "knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris."Because the law covers "any part," there is no legal distinction made based on the severity of the cut.In some communities and historical legal disputes, proponents have requested a medicalized "ritual nick"—a tiny incision or a drop of blood drawn from the clitoral hood without removing any tissue—as a compromise to satisfy cultural traditions while avoiding the physical harm of traditional FGM/C (Kimani & Shell-Duncan, 2018). Legal Status: This is strictly illegal in the United States.
>>538762165This is Eric Clopper btw. Not just a lawyer.https://youtu.be/FCuy163srRc
>>538762257It varies as there is many different forms of it some which remove more tissue than others but some forms of female circumcision remove less tissue and less functions then the average male circumcision >>538762266Federal and state laws reject this compromise, classifying it as federal child abuse and a felony, because it constitutes non-therapeutic alteration of a minor's genitalia (Ezioni, 2020)A procedure that removes only the prepuce (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans) without touching the clitoris itself is classified as Type Ia FGM/C (Galgano, 2024; Thomas, 2023) https://www.aafp.org/afp/2018/0101/p49#:~:text=TABLE%203.%20Female%20Genital%20Mutilation,the%20clitoris%20with%20the%20prepuceAnatomical Comparison: Anatomically, the clitoral hood is the female homologue (the structural equivalent) to the male foreskin. Removing just this skin is structurally the closest direct equivalent to standard male infant circumcision.Legal Status: While standard male infant circumcision remains entirely legal and widely practiced across the United States, performing the equivalent procedure (removing the clitoral hood) or any lesser procedure on a female minor is a federal crime carrying a penalty of up to 10 years in prison.All men who were circumcised as babies deserve at least 10 million USA dollars.They were innocent babies and were horribly, permanently and irreversibly mutilated for their entire one life on earth before it even began.There is NO way to FULLY or even MOSTLY recover their lost foreskins and all of it's structures. Stretching does not nearly even come close to restoring it to it's original form.Why at least 10 million usa dollars?Because there was a case of a adult man who merely had some mean words, drawings and jokes said to him at work. Nothing criminally illegal like death threats, leaking his social security number etc.
>>538762398He later quit his job at Tesla he wasn't fired. He was offered 15 million 2022 dollars for his hurt feelings by a usa judge https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/tesla-racism-lawsuit-worker-rejects-15-million-payout-rcna34655He was literally offered 15 million dollars that the government would take from Tesla and hand directly to him. He rejected it because he wanted more then 15 million 2022 dollars but the point stands the government is willing to say mean words and hurt feelings are worth at least 15 million 2022 dollars.Being circumcised as a baby is AT LEAST ten times worse so a mere ten million dollars per mutilated at birth man is already a deep deep compromise.CASE #2https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2023/07/20/mcdonalds-lawsuit-hot-chicken-nugget/70436203007/A random family is in a car. These are not employees they're just random customers.They go to McDonalds drive throughMom buys nuggetsGives nuggets (corpses of tortured and mutilated animals that were factory farmed) to her little kidKid drops nugget on thigh and it sits on her thigh for a few minutes or so while mother is distracted.It leaves a slight burn on thighBurn heals completely leaving a small barely noticable and not painful scar on thighGirl gets 800,000 dollars.Circumcising a baby is at least 13 times worse easily.It's obviously way way worse than 13 times but whatever let's be extremely conservativeThat's just over 10 million usa dollarsYou deserve this.ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION OF BABY BOYS IS BATTERY!! It is non consensual touching which is medically unnecessary. This is actually legally correct at least in usa as intactivist lawyers have arguedGUESS What? A battery can be worth 5 million dollars or more
>>538762437Circumcision is doing severe permanent irreversible physical damage to an innocent baby boy . Possible severe mental damage tooA hedge fund executive punched a parking attendant once during a dispute over a car.The Injuries: A broken cheekbone and a concussion. The victim recovered physically within months, but sued for emotional distress and battery.The Verdict: The jury awarded $1.2 million for medical bills and pain, but added $7 million in punitive damages specifically because of the defendant’s wealth and the "predatory" nature of the assault.This is the classic "regular guy" example often cited in legal circles.The Incident: A man was punched once by a security guard at a Las Vegas nightclub.The Injuries: A broken jaw and a concussion. No permanent disability, but the victim required surgery (his jaw was wired shut for weeks).The Result: A jury awarded him $4.75 million.$5 Million (Carroll v. Trump)While there was a later $83 million verdict for defamation, the original 2023 verdict for the battery itself was $5 million.The Incident: A single encounter in a department store dressing room.The Injuries: No "super severe" physical injuries (like broken bones or hospitalization), but the jury focused on the psychological trauma.The Result: The $5 million award was for the act of battery and the associated pain and suffering.If Carroll can get 5 million then so should men circumcised as boys
>>538762478Taddio, A., et al. (1997). "Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination." The Lancet, 349(9052), 599-603That is Neurological Imprinting. This study followed infants for months after their circumcision. It found that boys who were circumcised especially those without anesthesia, which was common at the time, showed a significantly stronger pain response higher heart rates, more intense crying during routine vaccinations months later compared to intact boys.I provided a peer reviewed evidence that the infant brain is rewired or sensitized by the trauma of circumcision thus refuting the myth that newborns don't feel pain or won't remember itFrisch, M., et al. (2013). "Cultural Bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on Male Circumcision." Pediatrics, 131(4), 796-800.peer-reviewed high-impact critique signed by 38 high-ranking physicians and health officials from 16 European countries. It was written specifically to dismantle the American Academy of Pediatrics claim that the benefits of routine baby boy cutting outweigh the risksIt argues that the alleged benefits (reduced UTI, HIV and cancer) are statistically marginal in developed Western nations. For example, it points out that you would need to circumcise between 909 and 322,000 infants to prevent a single case of pp cancer a disease that is already rare and can be prevented by hygiene and HPV vaccinationIt argues that because the medical benefits are not compelling the procedure violates the child's right to bodily integrity and should be deferred until the individual can provide informed consent.https://equalitynow.org/what-we-do/womens-rights-around-the-world/womens-rights-in-north-america/us_laws_against_fgm_state_by_state/Almost every state in the USA has laws against female circumcision of minors and many states have had laws making it illegal (and a felony) to circumcise a female minor for DECADES
Crimes against humanity and should be treated with that level of severity and importance.
>>538762548Female circumcision is already illegal and girls who are cut as babies can already sue for what was done to them when they become an adult, just apply the law equally to men too . She already has the legal ability to seek out compensation for that, I just want the law applied equally . So that men also have the ability to get restitution and have legal recourse. Why pay taxes and follow the social contract if police will protect baby girls from being cut but not baby boys? They’ll protect doctors who cut baby boys. women who are circumcised as girls can get literally millions of dollars and in their 20s and then retire very comfortably with her multi million dollar settlement and live comfortably off the backs of hard working broke men who were circumcised as babies and have no legal ability to get reparations or sue their doctors or hospitals.S 130.85 Female genital mutilation.A person is guilty of female genital mutilation when: (a) a person knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris of another person who has not reached eighteen years of age; or (b) being a parent, guardian or other person legally responsible and charged with the care or custody of a child less than eighteen years old, he or she knowingly consents to the circumcision, excision or infibulation of whole or part of such child`s labia majora or labia minora or clitoris.Such circumcision, excision, or infibulation is not a violation of this section if such act is: (a) necessary to the health of the person on whom it is performed, and is performed by a person licensed in the place of its performance as a medical practitioner; or (b) performed on a person in labor or who has just given birth and is performed for medical purposes connected with that labor or birth by a person licensed in the place it is performed as a medical practitioner, midwife, or person in training to become such a practitioner or midwife.
I'm chopped and I have no problems at all with arousal or sensitivity that's a problem.But I still want circumcisions banned for everyone except jews and muslims. Why allow it for jews and muslims you ask? So you can easily tell who's a jew/muslim and exterminate them. It's like branding.
>>538762257Yup. The ultimate control over women but self own. If sex becomes pointless, why have it?
>>538762591For the purposes of paragraph (a) of subdivision two of this section, no account shall be taken of the effect on the person on whom such procedure is to be performed of any belief on the part of that or any other person that such procedure is required as a matter of custom or ritual. Female genital mutilation is a class E felony.New York N.Y. Penal Law § 130.85 Effective 11/1/1997Who can women sue if circumcised as baby girl and how much money would they get in USA? What if it was done by doctor with nurses?Women can primarily sue the medical providers (doctor, nurses, hospital/clinic) who performed the procedure via medical malpractice, battery, or related tort claims. FGM (female genital mutilation/circumcision) on a minor is illegal under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 116, as amended) and in 41+ states, treated as child abuse with no cultural/religious/parental consent defense in most jurisdictions.https://equalitynow.org/what-we-do/womens-rights-around-the-world/womens-rights-in-north-america/us_laws_against_fgm_state_by_state/this is important because routine male infant circumcision is a battery. many lawyers have argued this and they are right.The doctor and assisting nurses/hospital are the Primary targets for civil liability. Performing non-medically necessary FGM on an infant deviates from the standard of care and constitutes negligence or intentional tort (e.g., battery). Many states explicitly allow civil damages in their FGM statutes (e.g., Arizona provides a civil remedy). obviously this applies to mgm tooParents/guardians: Potentially liable for facilitating or consenting, but suing one's own parents is rare, complex (family dynamics, statutes of limitations), and often not the focus. Criminal liability for parents exists in many states.it’s possible to civilly go after doctor nurses and hospital that performed the surgery but not go after your parents. there’s already cases of this with fgm
>>538762621>why have it?Its amazing that people can't make the connection that we evolved to enjoy sex so we'd have more of it. But I guess that's part of the transhumanist agenda to either eliminate sex entirely or only have it for utilitarian purposes and derive pleasure from elsewhere.
>>538762130a special part of me was torn away and i was never the same again
>>538762631Statute of limitations: Many states extend this for FGM/child abuse victims until years after turning 18 (e.g., 3–10 years post-18 in states like Arizona, Arkansas).Hospitals often carry large insurance policies, increasing settlement potential. Successful suits could include punitive damages if egregious.Done by doctor with nurses: Strongest case medical malpractice plus battery. Hospitals can be vicariously liable. Informed consent was impossible for an infant, and FGM isn't medically necessary (exceptions exist only for true health needs, like certain surgeries, not ritual "circumcision").again it should be very obvious how this applies to mgm too.In ny in 2019 would a woman who was circumcised as a baby in 1999 be able to sue?Yes, in 2019 in New York, a woman who was subjected to female genital mutilation ("circumcision") as a baby in 1999 could likely sue under the Child Victims Act (CVA), which took effect that year.https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/S2440Key ReasonsNew York Penal Law § 130.85 criminalizes FGM (knowingly circumcising, excising, or infibulating the labia majora/minora or clitoris of a person under 18, or a parent/guardian knowingly consenting to it). It is a class E felony and explicitly falls under Article 130 of the Penal Law (sexual offenses).https://criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com/new-york-penal-code/new-york-penal-code-130-85-genital-mutilation/CPLR § 214-g (the civil revival provision of the CVA, signed into law in February 2019) revived previously time-barred civil claims for conduct that would constitute a sexual offense under Article 130 (including § 130.85) committed against a child under 18. It allowed suits for physical, psychological, or other injuries from such acts. https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/cvp/article-2/214-g/
>>538762896The CVA created a one-time lookback window (roughly August 2019 to August 2021) for filing revived claims, regardless of the victim's age or how long ago the act occurred. A woman ~20 years old in 2019 would have fallen squarely within this window for events from 1999. https://hermanlaw.com/new-york/child-victims-act/Standard medical malpractice SOL (2.5 years under CPLR 214-a) or battery (1 year) would have long expired by 2019, but the CVA overrode that for qualifying sexual offenses like FGM. https://www.lanierlawfirm.com/new-york/civil-statute-of-limitations/Could she take home 5 million dollars? If the doctor hospital nurses were in on it and it’s extremely well documented that it happened and was premeditated with lots of papers signed by them and proof the hospital admins knew it was going to happen and allowed it to happenYes, in a strong case with the facts you describe, a multimillion-dollar recovery including potentially $5 million or more net to the plaintiff is realistically possible in New York under the 2019 Child Victims Act framework. https://www.lawsuit-information-center.com/new-york-sex-abuse-settlements.htmlWhy This Scenario Strengthens the CasePremeditation, documentation, and institutional knowledge: Signed papers, hospital admin awareness/approval, and involvement of doctor/nurses/hospital create powerful evidence of battery, lack of informed consent (impossible for an infant), negligence, and potentially punitive damages for egregious conduct. This goes beyond standard malpractice into intentional or reckless institutional wrongdoing.CVA applicability: FGM qualifies as a sexual offense under NY Penal Law § 130.85, reviving the claim in the 2019 lookback window. Courts treat it as child sexual abuse for civil purposes. https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/cvp/article-2/214-g/
Here's what most fail to realize. The skin between your circumcision scar and your head is inner foreskin. It's just inside out. You still have the mechanoreceptors. The tissue is literally still there.Just stretch it over the head to resensitize both. That's why foreskin restoration works.
>>538762928Realistic Compensation Ranges in NY CVA/Malpractice CasesNY juries and settlements in strong Child Victims Act cases (especially with documented institutional enabling) have producedSingle-plaintiff verdicts: $5M to $30M+ (e.g., $30M CVA verdict with $15M compensatory + $15M punitive; $13.3M; $5M affirmed on appeal). https://www.blockotoole.com/verdicts-settlements/30-million-ny-child-victims-act-verdict/Hospital/medical cases: Multi-million averages per plaintiff in mass settlements (e.g., Columbia/NewYork-Presbyterian paid ~$1.3M average per survivor in a large OB-GYN abuse case, with total payouts over $1B across resolutions). https://www.lawsuit-information-center.com/new-york-sex-abuse-settlements.htmlMedical malpractice analogs (severe lifelong harm from procedures on infants): Often tens of millions total, with pain-and-suffering components in the millions https://porterprotects.com/largest-birth-injury-settlements-new-york-history/$5 million net to her is plausible in an exceptional case with clear lifelong harms (physical scarring, sexual dysfunction, psychological trauma, PTSD, etc.), strong experts, and sympathetic facts. Higher amounts are possible with proven egregious conduct and high damages (economic + non-economic + punitives). Many cases settle confidentially for substantial sums to avoid trial risk. https://jtnylaw.com/2026/02/survivors-act-5-million-verdict-childhood-sexual-abuse-ny/In the ongoing Hadacheck v. State of Oregon case, Multnomah County Circuit Judge Melvin Oden-Orr denied the state’s motion to dismiss, ruling that the circumcised male plaintiffs had suffered a legitimate "injury in fact" and possessed proper standing to sue.>>538762933Many structures and functions will still be missing regardless of how much stretching you do. Thousands of years ago circumcision removed much less tissue but they changed it to remove more so you could not restore
Bump
>>538763037https://bioethicstoday.org/blog/the-case-for-equal-protection-for-all-children-against-forced-genital-cutting-is-moving-forward-full-speed-ahead/#:~:text=The%20Court%20found%20that%20Plaintiffs,in%20a%20court%20of%20law.By legally acknowledging that infant circumcision constitutes an "injury in fact," the court has already moved the needle past a mere medical disagreement. If a court recognizes a lifelong injury inflicted on a non-consenting minor based on their sex, the logical, constitutional conclusion is that those victims should have a path to restitution. Part A: Expanding the Law & Opening the Door to Lawsuits"Additionally, were the Court to adopt a saving construction of ORS 163.207 and 431A.600 that expanded the statutes’ protections to all non-medically necessary child genital cutting, Plaintiffs could vindicate their rights practically by suing their circumcisers under a statutory torts legal theory that is currently available only to female victims of child genital cutting."Key Terms Broken DownSaving Construction: When a law is challenged as unconstitutional, a court can sometimes "save" it by interpreting it in a new, broader, or narrower way rather than striking it down entirely. Here, the plaintiffs want the court to "save" the law by stretching it to cover all children, not just females.ORS 163.207 and 431A.600: These are Oregon’s specific criminal and public health statutes that explicitly ban Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
>>538763078Statutory Tort: A "tort" is a civil wrong that allows you to sue someone for money damages. A statutory tort means the right to sue is baked directly into a written law. Because FGM is illegal by statute, female victims have a clear, direct path to sue their cutters in civil court.in Plain EnglishThe plaintiffs are saying: "If the court agrees to rewrite or interpret Oregon's anti-FGM laws so that they protect allchildren instead of just girls, it will change the game. It means men who were circumcised as babies would suddenly gain the legal right to turn around and sue the doctors or practitioners who circumcised them for financial damages—a right that currently only women have under Oregon law." Here’s the 72 page lawsuit https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66119b8c4d0c10f1951590fc/67e6d9785f82dc54c6513cb7_2025-03-28%20-%20Hadachek%20v.%20Oregon%20-%20Amended%20Complaint%20(Conformed).pdftldr if the law was not literally sexist and was just applied equally and impartially most men alive today (in 2026) who are under the age of about 28 or so and live in / were born in a hospital in at least a handful of states in the United States of America would easily be entitled to hundreds of thousands of dollars or even a few million dollars each for what was done to them as a baby. I am not being hyperbolic. obviously if let’s conservatively say theres 3 million men in ny who are under the age of 27 and if 60 percent of them were born in and circumcised in a hospital in ny Thats 1.8 million men who are each entitled to a few million dollars each, 3 million dollars each times 1.8 million young ny cut men equals 5.4 TRILLION DOLLARS with a T . that’s like 1/6 of the entire usa national debt.
>i'm going to cut my son's dick up because some crazy jew did it thousands of years agojust another reason to avoid the 'hamics
>>538762928As a man who was mutilated at birth in a regional hospital, i believe this thesis is brilliant, desperately needed, and encouraging.My two sons are intact, it is time to stop this intergenerational ritual abuse of young men.
What's the point of this llm thread?Are you trying to test something?
>>538763204Thank youthe misandry is extremely explicit in the lawmen should be able to sue and bankrupt the hospitals who mutilated them If they can’t afford to compensate all their victims the government can bail them out so each circumcised man gets millions of dollars
>>538763265>no argument Point out a large mistake the llm madeI proofread everything
>>538763265its legalese you stupid niggerif you live in ny and are under 28 copypasta it to your local district courtroom clerk. or dont idk im not a lawyer and im too old and i will never touch new york rock>>538763313It should be painfully obvious that the law is discriminatory.if being "female' is a protected class that is news to me.does title 9 apply here, or is that only schools?
>>538763524Women in many other states who were circumcised as baby girls can still sue and get millions of dollars especially if they start the lawsuit before they are 21Many men don’t realize how bad it is and how explicit the discrimination is that it is literally codified into lawIt’s not just de facto Men are literally second class citizens
>>5387630995 million dollars for each man cut as baby100 million cut men100 million × $5 million = $500 trillionUS GDP is roughly $28 trillionThat's about 18 times the entire US economyso a 3 dollar loaf of bread would become 54 dollars or so.100 USA DOLLAR BILL will barely EVEN BUY YOU A SODA AND THAT IS OKAYIf bread costs 60 dollars a loaf that's fine. It's the uncircumcised who didn't get reparations who won't be able to afford bread at first. They can work for a circumcised person who got reparations for 200 dollars an hour or somethinghttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WWVz_DcSeZcHe wasn't even arrested. He wasn't even handcuffed. If he can get millions of dollars why can't I?
>>538763619but that is a clear violation of the civil rights act.why not sue? might as well try, especially if you are young enough to see the suit go to the supreme court.some psycho will cut their boy to do just this, at the behest of (((donors))).much better to respect your son's dignity and say no to this barbaric shit
>>538762130https://foregen.org/
>>538763844Eric clopper is currently doing this It’s best to donate to him as lawsuits are expensive and complicated unless you have 60k lying around to pay a lawyer to test your untested legal theory about a routine medical procedure actually being a sexual assault dozens of times until you maybe find a non gay judge Trying to sue the doctor or hospital who cut you is like trying to run for presidency in North Korea
>>538762130Anteater dick cope thread
>>538763957it uses extremely immoral animal testing Yes, Foregen has conducted animal testing (preclinical studies) in the past. https://foregen.org/updates/november-1st-2025 in their preclinical animal studies (rat and sheep trials), animals were subjected to surgical implantation procedures and were euthanized at the end of the study periods for tissue analysis. https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/11/1186 At predefined endpoints (5 days and 30 days post-implantation), the rats were euthanized using carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation, followed by biopsy and histological analysis of the implantation site.implantation surgery inherently causes some pain, stress, and post-operative discomfort, and the animals were killed for science. Critics of animal testing (including some Foregen supporters on forums) acknowledge this as inherent suffering in such work. https://www.reddit.com/r/Foregen/comments/pq5kmi/question_about_animal_trials_ethics/
Every day I wake up to a world where kikes have convinced us to mutilate millions of children and no one gives a single micro fuck.The human race is inherently evil.
>>538764019Kill yourself
>>538764594don’t forget abortion is still legal for the mother in all fifty states thanks to feminist pro lifers and most people regularly pay for animal torture by buying factory farmed meat Welcome to Hell
BUMP
>>538766264Bumped
So sick of these cowards standing in the way of real fucking change.
>>538767382They can’t accept their parent(s) were evil or brainwashed
>>538762130how is this not the biggest political movement for men in america? give me fucking reparations this isnt some abstract nigger slave story where you have complicated lineages to figure out without historical documentation this is easily proven in court. we were attacked by kikes on our first day of life a few decades ago by kike doctors who still walk among us. we need nuremberg trials and million dollar reparations.NO FORESKIN NO WORKIN
>>538767808holy fuckin IDParents who do this to kids are really disturbed
>>538767808basedIf you become homeless from being NEET you can always go to public library and play Minecraft on a PvP server with circumcisers
>>538762257The foreskin. They have a foreskin over the clit that protects it.
>>538764019We've been over this moshe, nobody with an intact dick is coping because if for some idiotic reason we wanted it snipped we could go get it done at any time, you are the one coping because you're mutilated goylem.
While I agree, restoring my foreskin was an excellent decision and I’m glad I did it
>>538762130>>538762130The foreskin protects the head. So if you're circumcised, the head is exposed and becomes desensitized. Regrowing foreskin would help the head regain sensitivity even if the foreskin itself doesn't have any more nerves.>>538762165>The federal laws and almost all state laws in the United States treat baby girls being circumcised very differently than baby boys being circumcised. It’s probably one of the clearest examples of misandryit is. And the fact that American feminists make excuses for it and tell us male genital mutilation is no big deal is one of the clearest examples of feminist hypocrisy.
kys tranny
>>538767382>>538767734its literally the exact same logic that women use in countries with FGM. But feminists will point to men being okay with it as a reason that there's nothing wrong with it.
>>538769758>you DON'T want to mutilate a child's genitals?>that must mean you're a tranny!!!You just thought you could come to 4chan and randomly spam "tranny" and we would think you're cool? Just go back, you don't fit in at all and it's really obvious.
>>538769631>>538769774Many Western feminist women don’t want to give up their place on the victim hierarchy by admitting how bad mgm is
>>538769920Unfortunately if I started identifying as a woman tomorrow it would not suddenly give me extra rights to sue the doctor who cut me as a baby boy The law is written to discriminate against both men and men who identify as women But If you are a woman who identifies as a man you can still sue the doctor who circumcised you as a baby girl There’s no escape from being a second class citizen as a male except violence
>>538762130Foreskin Restoration is such a misleading term. I hate the faggots who promote it usage. How hard is it to simply call it something that give you coverage of what you loss? Faux skin generation? Skin Stretching? Who started calling it restoration? Dumb asses.>>538762327>>538762363>>538762398>>538762437This shit pisses me off so much.
>>538770653>The law is written to discriminate against both men and men who identify as womenthey said that about women's sports, and now we have men winning women's track meets. Canadian men are getting lower car insurance rates just by identifying as a woman.It might not work in a Republican state but if you live in a deep blue area you could sue them for being transphobic.>There’s no escape from being a second class citizen as a male except violenceor this (in Minecraft hahaha!)
>>538770724Go donate to Eric clopper go fund me We will see if he is successful soon>>538770815But fgm laws describe anatomy not identity A person is guilty of female genital mutilation when:(a) a person knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris of another person who has not reached eighteen years of age; or(b) being a parent, guardian or other person legally responsible and charged with the care or custody of a child less than eighteen years old, he or she knowingly consents to the circumcision, excision or infibulation of whole or part of such child’s labia majora or labia minora or clitoris.
>>538768166Seriously how fucking dumb do you have to be to do it to your son.I wasn't even a le edgy teenager, but I realized how much I hate my parents and grandparents who did it to my dad too and probably started the kiked cycle.>grow up penis feels good>make babies>chop up your sons penis just because
>>538770967Screw donations. That lead to nothing. I'm honeslty done with this bullshit. What has donating to who ever done? More money in someone else pocket.
>>538771049Stopped Medicaid coverage of circumcision? This is proven to decrease circumcision rates
>>538762130All of this "Intactivism" is uber cringe, especially the Blood Stained Men.Just drop out of society completely and make it clear that you're not going to wagecuck or otherwise contribute until foreskin regeneration is perfected.
>>538762165There needs to be a nationwide class-action lawsuit against the circumcision industrial complex.
>>538762621Because muslims are all rapists.
>>538762130What kind of retard would want to regrow their foreskin? I'm so glad my parents had me circumcised as a child, and that's why I made sure my 3 sons all had it done too.
>>538762165if they lose the case they should just visit every single faggot that was against it and cut their dick in their sleep.let see how legal it is.
