[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 475.jpg (40 KB, 260x385)
40 KB JPG
what are the political implications of invincible-woman movies bombing so hard?
>>
>>538778785
its just a bucket list for the rich. no interest in making good movies or to own trump.
>>
File: 1724612195609478.jpg (44 KB, 660x650)
44 KB JPG
They should've followed up the Superman movie with a Batman movie, would Batman have flopped? sure but it would've made more money than Supergirl
>>
>>538778990
If it was batgirl, sure.
>>
File: disappointment.png (49 KB, 306x306)
49 KB PNG
the plot sounds retarded.

>a space pirate poisoned my super dog with kryptonite so I need to kill them to cure him (but I need to emphasize that I am NOT killing them for revenge. Revenge is bad)

who the fuck wrote this
>>
go woke go ACCKKK
>>
>>538778785
They should make heroes women relate to, who use guile and elegance to win. Women don't like watching some girl punch all her problems, that's what men like, and men aren't 90s men anymore, we see women doing it and we hate it.
>>
>>538778785
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62UzLgdb1GQ
>>
>>538778785
Let me guess, the movie is about men not treating her seriously? Or men ignoring her unrequested nagging?
>>
>>538778785
Women aren't human, they are hu.
>>
>>538779829
No, it's really about how she's sad that Krypton blew up, and then some pirates poisoned her dog, and she's gotta kill them all, but NOT for revenge though.
>>
>>538779282
is that really the plot lmao
i might watch this shit just for that
>>
>>538778785
Too unrealistic.

But we should definitely encourage women to believe that they are more powerful than men, and let them learn the hard way...
>>
>>538779779
Women liked True Grit. They like protags like that. The capeshit trend has to go.
>>
>>538779282
John Wick, but his dog stayed dead.
>>
File: 34qg.png (2.54 MB, 1280x1384)
2.54 MB PNG
>>538778785
I like how they cast a young woman whos face looks like a 40 year old woman's. Its like what they do for video games but in reverse.

For video games they get a 20~ year old model and then age up her face so she looks like all the 40+ year old women in HR who get make decisions about the game.
>>
>>538779961
>and she's gotta kill them all, but NOT for revenge though.
This is the fundamental problem with women and democrat voters. If space pirates attempt to kill me and I have no reason to forgive their mistake, I am going to destroy them so it will never be a problem.

A dog that bites humans is euthanized. A murderer that has no potential for rehabilitation is executed, not as a punishment, but as the best solution to a repeat problem.

>spare me supergirl
>If I spare you, you will again return to doing the things for which I am eliminating you, therefore die.
>>
>>538778785
>humiliation ritual shock tests
>how much sawdust can you out in rice-crispies treats before people won't eat them
>>
>>538778785
she's dogfuck ugly and her teeth are fucked up
>>
>>538778785
Reminder James Gunn stopped WB from casting Sydney Sweeney as supergirl.
>>
>>538778785
They'll keep making more until people start liking them again.
They got infinite financing for those.
Big companies don't even need to profit from the products they make anymore. It's more important to attract institutional investors that can pretty much print money.
We got central planning without any pretense of actual socialism.
>>
>>538778785
>bombing
are you that dumb? the movie will get like a trillion views on streaming platforms. and the payouts from investment firms like blackrock and vanguard due to esg compliance vastly outweigh the soft box office returns. do you honestly believe a monolithic hollywood studio would just willingly release a film this expensive if roi wasn't guaranteed? this board is fucking retarded...



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.