[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HNAhF5dXQAAWMbF.jpg (733 KB, 4032x2268)
733 KB JPG
In the test conducted under the leadership of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation/CASC, the first stage was successfully captured and recovered by being controllably held by the catch-by-net system on the Linghang Zhe (Navigator) rescue platform deployed at sea, using 4 capture hooks instead of traditional deployable landing legs

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2rmmx86pdo
>>
File: hq720.jpg (33 KB, 686x386)
33 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt1V9UWhuKk

China does this better
>>
>arresting cable
democrats would shit their pants crying if we used that technology
>>
>>538798333
Now let's see them engineer their demographics and wealth gaps.
>>
>>538798454
>American ingenuity
>A m e r i c a n i n g e n u i t y
>>
>>538798479
?? Housing is inexpensive and gets cheaper is somehow a bad thing ??

Did you forget that they don't value wealth like we do?
>>
File: china G9pxgria0AAniLW.png (599 KB, 528x853)
599 KB PNG
>>538798479
I don't think chinese have jews and pedophiles controlling 90% of the country's wealth despite being less than 1% of the total population.
>>
>>538798333
this is honestly a lot smarter than the chopsticks, which always look like they're about to fucking fall over
>>
File: 1753149539249216.jpg (168 KB, 1024x986)
168 KB JPG
>>538798479
Is Ireland in better shape than China?
>>
>>538798333
They invented a net. Great.
>>
>>538799343
Lidar coordination and mechanical response require sophisticated computing capabilities.
>>
>>538799076
realism vs fantasy
>>
>>538799410
It’s a net.
>>
>>538799490
You can't reproduce it, you don't have the tech to copy them.
>>
>>538799517
nigga it's a net on a frame on a boat
>>
File: 1762799798532761.jpg (34 KB, 517x800)
34 KB JPG
>>538799461
It's really because China is communist, and Murrica is late stage capitalist.
>>
>>538799559
Neither Canada, nor Italy can reproduce that feat, you don't have the tech to copy them.
>>
>>538798333
A low cost solution that works.
The mutt version is extremely dangerous, it require the engine running to the very moment it almost touches the ground which drastically increases the possibility of explosion. It is a "hot landing".
With chink nets, once it's captured, the engine can then be shutdown immediately and the rocket itself still have some distance to the landing pad. It's essentially a "cold landing".
>>
>>538798919
It’s not since you need a landing as platform. SpceX solution will be generalizable sp that you eventually can land anywhere without a platform, making the design applicable for space exploration and obviously a lot cheaper.

What this tells you is that the Chinese can’t figure out how to land with legs. It tells you that they are behibd SpaceX. Nothing a bit of spying will solve though, obviously. The Chinese will get their hands on SpaceX tech eventually.
>>
>>538798418
They don't have nets on the moon.
>>
File: 1767607129764158.png (1.43 MB, 2442x2646)
1.43 MB PNG
>>538799744
>SpceX solution will be generalizable sp that you eventually can land anywhere without a platform
It's designed like that because they need
<-This


>What this tells you is that the Chinese can’t figure out how to land with legs.
China doesn't need the invasion tech, they just need affordable ways to bring items to orbit.

Like the poster above you said, the Chinese method is the safer and superior method, for its purpose.
>>
>>538799771
>They don't have nets on the moon.
Actually, they can easily land a net-frame like that on the moon.

It's easy because it just needs to be dumped there, the net-frame will never need to leave the moon. So it's simple.
>>
File: 1779708275438294.png (581 KB, 640x426)
581 KB PNG
China is the future of mankind.
Muttmerica can no longer win.
>>
File: images (6).jpg (42 KB, 640x480)
42 KB JPG
>>538798418
Why is it coal powered? The thing is a fucking flying chimney on fire
>>
>>538799883
>how they will invade you

How to tell us youre brown without telling us directly
>>
>>538799461
Realism nets to catch rocket
Fantasy legs to land on Mars
Less payload for legs to justify market cap by selling hype
China can just microwave starlink btw
>>
>>538798518
Volcarlos!
>>
>>538798333
what it launches from that thing
>>
>>538801786
No, it only catches the boster as it comes down. They don't have to worry about having fine adjustments in the last 50-100M as long as it's over the barge it can catch it.
So basically if you get 95% there it solves the last 5% of the problem of trying to land perfectly with <5m precision/ perfect tilt.
>>
>>538801786
Nah the wires catch the rocket instead of landing it. OP is a retard and doesn't even know that the net catch method was pioneered on /sci/ by shitposters years before China "borrowed" the idea as they always do.
>>
File: 1764420832901006.png (197 KB, 873x600)
197 KB PNG
>>538801901
Source? You can link to the archive if you are not afraid of comparing.
>>
>>538801901
>the net catch method was pioneered on /sci/
Oh, what an invention, catching something with a net is /sci and only there.

But the steel frame method with some wires were the below is water is pretty good. One lidar, a few motors and there is a big error zone on landing and swell. You can set the damping by software too to not damage the rocket. Even when something went wrong you have a second chance on the water surface. But i am sure /sci had that idea long before the first frog on earth watches a sunrise.
>>
>>538804038
It's /sci/ you unlurked swine
>>
>>538798479
didnt know ireland had fallen down so hard
>>
>>538798333
It is Not surprise at all!
compare China 3rd place and USA 21th place

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country

Special focus on Israel and Ukraine

Hint : You have to scroll way down the list!
Hint2: Compare USA and Iran 7th place !!! See?

Logic!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.