Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy or Turkey, you have about a month to GTFO.France wants to distribute its 300 little nukes around for "deterrence" - before a single one of those arrives, the potential host countries are going to be leveledLeave NATO countries now, unless you want to be killed or potentially tried to be drafted (and partake in a violent uprising against the polity)
>>538976928>ook ook we gonna nookTwo more weeks.
>>538976928russia is not doing to good
>>538976928>begging people to move on 4cuckthe absolute state of RuZZian shills
>>538976968It has no other choice.And for the EU and others involved in the circular ponzi around loans to Ukraine so Ukraine buys subsidized military production its one and the same getting nuked or losing the ponzi flywheel
>>538976928You should follow the example given to you by your elders.
>>538977020well lets seecan Ziggeria nuuk ?
>>538977040You are completely fucked. Well stay in Pooland, you might be the only idiots that are seriously going to march toward the border after your political institutions got beheaded
>>538976928You won't do shit
>>538976928Russia is a loser country nobody takes manlet putins crying and screeching seriously :D
>>538977122You won't do shit. That's the funny part. France same as you is never going to repay in kind, while the idiots that decided to host your toys are going to stop existing
nukes arent real retardcongratulations on falling for 70 year old american propaganda
>>538976928Do it faggot.
>>538976928>300 little nukesWhat good is 300 nukes against 4000 nukes?
>>538976928French have ICBMs and nuclear submarines.
>>538977184Probably more like 8000.What its good for? Of course the same as subsidizing military production and giving loans to Ukraine to then buy it, ponzing for fake gdp growth so the bonds don't crash to 0 and yield goes infinite. France wants of course some monies from the host country. Its part of a suicidal the ponzi
>>538976928>puccia will nuke all of europe expecting no retaliation from any nuke holder, including those in europeLeast deranged zigger on the planet.
>>538977282Who is going to retaliate? France, lol. The UK? Lmfao. The USA? Rotflmfao
>>538976928Why would I escape a draft against russia?
>>538976928Fuck off back to Russia and join the next meat wave in Donbabwe.
>>538976928germany, italy, turkey and other european nations have already nukes stationed as part of natos nuclear sharing program.
>>538977337The US will try to retaliate against Europe if Europe retaliates against russia.But the US can't even defeat Iran so that's kinda not an issue.
>>538977337Do... you genuinelly think everyone will just let Russia nuke a bunch of NATO countries without retaliating?
>>538977184How many large population centers does russia have? What the hell do you do with thousands of excess nukes?>>538977337You think they won't when russia just seemingly goes full ape and launches hundreds of nukes all at once? I wouldn't be surprised if even china nuked them in that case. But your reply truly tipped your hand in how mentally retarded or hard of a shill you are.
>>538977395Doesn't matter, america will not move against russia.
>>538977184You only need to remove Mosque and Pidorsburg. Russia is extremely centralized.
>>538977415Why would they risk to get also nuked? See it like this, its more about taking potential competition off the board. France profits when Germany no longer exists
>>538977414Unironically yes
>>538977490France doesn't profit from an irridated wasteland next door, however.
>>538976928>other countries are getting nooooooooks>we must kill them or else we wont be able to invade them in the future when we want to!Nothing will happen, best korea got nukes and usa didnt do shit. Russia wont do shit either.
>>538977514USA isn't strong enough to take on BRICS anymore.
>>538977508Of course it does. If its the only larger player on the continent left, it has total power.
>>538977172Bon jour Maximehow is Mama doing ?
>>538977415>How many large population centers does russia have? What the hell do you do with thousands of excess nukes?Often see this argument in nafo bubbles but Paris is also like 18% of population of France, idk about Moskva but it can't be more than that.
>>538977560> If its the only larger player on the continent left, it has total power.Until the wind turns then it's gg.Same reason why Germany will not allow France to be nuked. Same reason why Putin will not nuke Ukraine.
>>538977184Russia only has two cities which matter.
>>538977537BRICS is a meme, retard. We're never fighting a war for China, neither is India.
>>538977605It's not about population but about industry, politics etc.Russia doesn't draft much from Mosque and Pidorsburg because unrest in those place will really hurt them. Unrest anywhere else is not a problem even if they level the whole city.
>>538977490Think about it like this, tranny. When hundreds or thousands of nukes take off from russia, no one knows exactly where they're going. Even if this wasn't enough, do you seriously believe that the calculation of avoiding being nuked allows a country that nukes an entire continent to remain on the face of the earth? One tantrum from monke and any country on the planet is nuked at that point, and no country with nukes is taking that risk.It truly baffles me how dimwitted most people are about geopolitical realities surrounding nukes. It's like you raped faggots think a nuke is just the same as a normal high-explosive ballistic or cruise missile and treated by everyone as such, despite none ever being used by anyone after the US lost its momentary monopoly.
>>538977160Even if you're right, bombs, rockets, and open-air microwave cookers are most certainly not propaganda.
>>538977648idk what you're saying. if russia decides to nuke ukraine tomorrow absolutely nothing catastrophic would happen, out of ukraine that is.
>>538977605That's a lot more than 1/300. The point was that 300 nukes is enough to wipe out >90% of russia's population and large military bases. Comparisons are irrelevant for this, unless you're implying nuking one city 500 times is somehow useful.
The more refineries they lose the more wild their fantasies get. Yesterday I saw one unironically proclaiming that Russia would steamroll Europe in 48 hours if only the US stopped giving Ukraine satellite intel :D
>>538977648France technically considers its own nukes up to 300kT as fair use without a nuclear context though.
>>538977337Yes... that's why they're not used.
>>538977537Well russia cant even steamroll fucking hohols. It wont do shit.BRICS is a memeRussia is weak and stuck in a war for few wooden sheds in pizdojebańsk that they cant retake after 5 years.India and China have territotial conflicts and hate eachother.Brasil wont do anythingSouth Aftica is a fallen state and wont do anything either.All of europe could get nukes and russia would just screech autistically.
okyaa zegro
>>538977847>Well russia cant even steamroll fucking hohols. It wont do shit.They didn't use single nuke tho.
>>538976928>before a single one of those arrives, the potential host countries are going to be leveledby who retard, ayy lmaos ? Because Ivan can’t win in Ukraine and you think will start a new frontline who will be like 3 times bigger? >muh nukesThe monkey from Moscow won’t nuke shit >>538977184300 Nukes will be enough for Moscow and St Petersburg
>>538977847More nukes were dropped on this trvuke than Putin ever will.
>>538977697warfare is 99% propaganda this is how you win, goebbels knew this very well
>>538977708Then why haven't they nuked Ukraine? Why hasn't the US nuked iran? Why hasn't china nuked Taiwan? If nukes are just free to use fun for the whole family and no one cares, why not? Why has not a single country used a single nuke after WW2?>>538977821Which is fine as long as it remains theoretical. Behind closed doors any such operation would likely be examined and re-examined to death before it was carried out because of the dangers it poses. It's a decent stance to make sure no one fucks with you, but if someone calls your bluff and you have to deliver, another country with France's stated policy would probably nuke pre-emptively before they're hit. No one seems to want to let the genie out of the bottle, though.
>>538976928
>>538977920I don't follow the logic bcause france is even more centralized than russia and also have only two big cities, also paris holds higher percentage of total population than moscow.
>>538977847ga?
>>538976928>France wants to distribute its 300 little nukes around for "deterrence"I got an email yesterday, I'll get one apparently. Do you know any good ICBM vendor out there ?
>>538977455Why must nukes be used specifically on civilian infrastructure for gratuitous mass slaughter?Just because it was the standard set by judeoamericans, it doesn't mean you shouldn't hit far more valuable military NATO-or Russian targets instead (which usually are not directly adjacent to large population centers)This meme of nukes existing solely for vaporizing administration centers (civilians, politicians and the service economy) while leaving most of the military hierarchy and personnel intact, is completely retarded and needs to die.Cities are the safest place for nukes unless your enemy is a bloodthirsty jew.
>>538977933Brits had a sound effects division which is like instant propaganda near the battlefield.
>>538976928the conflict went nuclear back in 2014/2015
>>538977873Yeah that is why i am convinced they wont use any.Ukies have made the suicide mission into russian territory and they still havent dropped a single one.I think that you would have to actually invade russia for them to use the nukes, but thats it.
>>538978166
>>538978116The reason is because the only targets big enough for most nukes are large population centers. You don't need even a small nuke for most military targets.
>>538978016Nah, Russia should have already used nuke in Ukraine. That would save hundreds of thousands of lives on both sides.First blow up some empty field in the middle of nowhere, if no capitulation next some city more to the west like Lviv but also give warning in advance like two weeks so people can evacuate - they're not ukrainians to make gore videos out of it.
>>538977708You don't really want to create (slightly off-)white terrorists who abandon all restraint. You don't really need nukes for mass destruction after all.
>>538976928we had russian nukes stationed for decades and nothing happened...btw we just retired last warsaw pact era nuke certified planes last year... and famously our US sourced planes need US approval to actually integrate with new weapon system - and they refused every single time if it was not made in USofA..
>>538978309PS. the same is true for Iran BTW. They are way too high IQ for Trump to go total war on civilians.
>>538978256Ziggers are so delusional that they think Russia could simply starting dropping nukes at will without any form of retaliation.
>>538978211The 60s are calling and want you back.Nukes now aren't in the Mt range, they are almost all tactical nukes in the 10-300kt and are precise enough to be used against small military targets. That's the whole doctrine of both USA and Russia
>>538978073This is completely irrelevant. You get no bonus points for using a smaller percentage of your nuclear arsenal to wipe out your enemy. 300 is enough to obliterate russia, so it's irrelevant that 4000 is also enough to obliterate france. Think of it like this:If someone kills you with a handgun but you at the same time kill them with one of your 500 cannons, did you win?
>>538977414as sad as it may be, that's the truthjust look at when the baltic countries were shitting themselves when russia found out that "ukraine" intended to attack them from there: they were shitting themselves because if they got nuked, all they would have gotten was "thoughts and prayers" and maybe a few pallets of covid masks and a pfizer voucher for 10000 free doses of "vaccine"
>>538976928>a month to GTFO Can you wait, like, two months?I'm almost done with this bish
>>538978309>next day a 777 from buttfuck Mali flies over Moscow with a hydrogen bomb
>>538976928> here, (((fellow European))), your nuclear warhead you begged from us> just to remind you, you need to deliver it by a plane to your target> Russia Kinzhaling your arse before the planes can take off? Don't be silly.> you have nothing to fear now, since we control when that plane carried warhead can be used.NATO & EU are the enemies of European peoples, and every politician promoting theit bureacracies' goal deserves to be hanged.
>>538977337french.france will launch nukes at russians as soon as some type of unjustified aggression is started by imperialist russianslet me remind you what everyone knows, france is a holy land, like what israel is to americans, or what audi arabian mecca is to bangladeshis and englishas such, france is protected by pope's prayers (pope speaks with jesus every day) and france as dearest daughter of the holy mother church and protected by g'd himself is prepared to deal with schismatics
>>538976928>the potential host countries are going to be leveledFucking finally
>>538978453No, they air disperse shit, with drones. Even without the bunkers with WMD biolabs Russia says they have it's not that hard.
>>538976928so not my problem?
>>538978256So why have they not? Are the russians retarded? Is Putin a monkey who can't tell his own head from his ass?>>538978405You're right, and I did write that in a retarded way. What I meant was more like the majority of targets that are big enough that they'd justify breaking out the nukes are civilian. There's probably at least american, russian and chinese military bases that using tactical nukes on would be reasonable, but even those you'd probably prefer to not nuke in most cases, as even a tactical nuke will likely trigger a nuclear exchange, and there's no telling if one of those will stop escalating.
digitd and we have war in 2 weeks
>>538978868>the majority of targets that are big enough that they'd justify breaking out the nukes are civilianNope, air force bases are huge, you need only one nuke to erase it, but a lot of missiles to disable all the planes and the runways. Nukes are mandatory for eliminating the reinforced bases that most country have one or two of. You also need a couple of nukes to neutralize the fleet, make that 4-5 ports for France.But yes, nukes won't be used in Europe because of the fallout and retaliation problems as we are all packed together (with Moscow) on a small area with major winds blowing from the West tot he East.Biological weapons on the other hand...
>>538978995War in Europe won't happen before social chaos. The revolution, as its name implies, will come back to end in France.I think Russia will then panic at the idea of the french nuclear arsenal and 50+ nuclear reactors being left unattended for and try to come here and take control of it. NATO will use some biological weapon to cut the supply lines, destroying most of the eastern countries.
And Algeria will attack from the South thinking it can have some revenge
Russia will never use nukes unless its original territory is threatened by annexation. The reason is because of the boxer paradox. Right now, the world is like a boxing ring. Everyone has agreed to certain rules. You may not kick, you may not pull out a knife, you may not wrestle people to the floor. As long as everyone keeps these rules alive, warfare is predictable and clean. Once someone, anyone, starts using kicks, or pulls out a knife, the rule breaks down, and whoever did it will find that their opponents are not slow to escalate. In the context of war, this means that as long as Russia agrees not to use nukes, certain chemical weapons, certain biological weapons, then Ukraine and everyone else also agrees not to use them. That is beneficial, because anything you can do to others, they can quickly do to you. And if you have more opponents than one (or if you believe you do, which Russia does when it looks at NATO countries), you absolutely do not want to set a precedence where you break the boxing rules, so to speak. People think these rules came about because of some kind of altruism from world leaders. Not so. They came about because some weapons are extraordinarily difficult to defend against. Conventional weapons are simple to understand, and simple to defend against. But biological weapons? Nukes? Gas? Really difficult to defend against.Russia will never use those nukes, unless they suspect they'll lose territory. The risk, and the costs, are way too high.
>>538976995What would the Brazilian government do if facing an existential threat?
>>538979271>annexationHow about dissolution?
>>538976928>partake in a violent uprising against the polity
>>538979424Then it would be far more effective to give Putin (or a body double) some pollonium tea and end the war.Their internal problems won't be solved by a bigger war.
>>538979424Depends entirely on how it happens. I do not think forced dissolution through military means will work, and it's entirely possible that such an endeavour will end up with a nuclear threat, and the intent to follow through. Putin is paranoid though (which is a rational reaction to his circumstances). He only communicates with close allies through (figurative) locked doors. He knows full well that he does not have the support of neither the people nor his generals. But he has enough support to keep on trucking for the time being. That support is quickly eroding though. We'll see how it shakes out within two years.
