>As shown in table 1, the study started by asking the participants if their children were born in or out of wedlock. >92% of the respondents were not married when they had their child leaving 8% of the women from the group who did have their child in wedlock. >Asian women occupied the lowest percentages of children out of wedlock with African American fathers even though the numbers were still prodigiously high. Caucasian women on the other hand had the highest percentage of children out of wedlock with African American father...>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315367933_Ninety_Two_Percent_Examining_the_Birth_Trends_Family_Structure_Economic_Standing_Paternal_Relationships_and_Emotional_Stability_of_Biracial_Children_with_African_American_FathersEven if the study's sample population was biased, the fact that women with Mulatto children are disproportionately likely to be single moms is obvious. Go to a Walmart anywhere in the Midwest and pay attention to what you see. This means that people who tell you "hey, White women aren't super racially loyal, just check the intermarriage data, they mix less than men!" are gaslighting you. Most race-mixing between White women and non-White men occurs *outside* of marriage. It normally doesn't lead to pregnancy. When it does, it often ends in single motherhood. This is backed up by birth data.People constantly lie about this and obfuscate the data. They don't want you to know the truth.
>>539033323You're not fooling anyone, jam boy
>>539033323This is backed up by birth data. National Populist Newsletter has an excellent breakdown available here: >https://natpop.substack.com/p/whites-see-baby-bump-for-second-yearThere has been a slight increase in White births under Trump, however, only about 40% of births in the US are to two non-Hispanics Whites and 50% of mothers are non-Hispanic White. The 10 percentage point disparity is because 80% of non-Hispanic White women have children with non-Hispanic White men whereas 20% have children with non-White fathers. Aka 1 in 5. >>539033439>Everyone I don't like is Indian!Grow up.
>>539033323Never forget who subverted them.
>>539034490MAJOR cope!! Anyway it wouldn't even be possible to determine white women's loyalty since white men are most desired by all races (ergo choosing a white male is literal self-interest).
>>539033323Americans And their niggers fetush are truly astounding. OP ist even oqrse than their women lol
>>539033323>White Womenlelthose women aren't white
>>539033323Nobody is actually reading those studies. They just want to be antifemitic to be shocking and edgy.
>>539034875This is true White women
>>539034788>(((memeflag))) defending kikesChecks out.
Except we have the non marriage stats we have the hook up statd as well.We even have them during the course of time when clubs and bars were closed and meeting peope online became the majority. The covid lock downs destroyed this cuck cope foreverMeanwhilehttps://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/>47% of Black adults report being single, higher than the share among other racial and ethnic groups.https://mashable.com/article/racism-online-dating>Asian, Latina, and white straight women all refuse messages from Black men -2021https://www.ucpress.edu/blog/54733/dating-while-black-online-but-invisible/>Black men and women daters were particularly discriminated compared to other minority daters. White straight women are twice as likely to respond to White men compared to Black men. -2022https://www.inverse.com/culture/36379-tinder-black-women-asian-men-racism>“Black and Latin men faced ‘similar discrimination,’ while white men had ratings “most high among women of all races.”https://www.futurity.org/racism-dating-apps-2890062-2/>White women were the most discriminatory in their exclusion of Black daters, which is also an important finding.https://news.stanford.edu/2019/08/21/online-dating-popular-way-u-s-couples-meet/>Meeting online has become the most popular way U.S. couples connect, Stanford sociologist findshttps://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/02/college-aged-adults-are-now-the-most-likely-online-daters/462384/>College-Aged Adults Are Now the Most Likely Online Datershttps://www.nimbleappgenie.com/blogs/dating-app-statistics/#>Online dating platform use is fairly equal among races, with 29% of white people, 31% of black people, and 28% of Hispanic people having used a dating app
>>539033323> 1 in 5Would be my estimate too. They are usually fatter and less attractive though, A bunch of old hags are doing it tooEither way if you factor that together with radical feminists people should stop attempting to shame white men for going for foreign women, it is mathematically impossible for every White man who wants a wife or at least children to have one with the local pool. White nationalists are delusional as are wife-guys. You simply have to shoot your shot and you get what you get.
>>539033564>>539033323>2pbtid paywalled garbage>My only argument is mudsharks are whoresAll fields
