We need to make it illegal for people like this to exist in our society.The moment someone even suggests infringing on the rights of others should result in a life sentence of forced labor.
Can we just cut out all the fluff and make it legal for black people to commit crimes?
>>539052702I'd be for meeting you half way and banning police.
>yfw it’s called Flock because that’s how they view you
>>539052560Watch tuckers new segment about this douche, bretty good
>>539052560>crime increases
>>539053354That's fine. Crime is oppprtunity and socieconomic mobility.You're basically aruging for just having everyone who is a successful criminal who already made it be allowed to keep their stolen resources and high status just because they scammed their way to the top and made great advances in making the masses submissive.
>>539054478*socioeconomic
>>539052560>eliminate all crime in America That’s cute. I just watched a dozen videos of some African Americans waving around full auto pistols while smoking blunts in public. England has tons of CCTV, did the crime rates go down? Do stupid impulsive people incapable of emotional regulation care if you have committing crimes on live-streamed 4K?>is the surveillance used to stop corrupt politicians? Nope. It’s all about totalitarian control. Faggots like this guy are turning the country into a prison while claiming they’re doing so for our safety. How heroic! He even made billions of dollars doing it. What a sacrifice! Science and tech haven’t liberated humanity, they’ve enslaved it.
>mutts take a few vids where max 100 cameras get destroyed >WE THE REVOLUTION WE ACTUALLY CHANGE THINGS!!!!!!>meanwhile 80k+ cameras leftlmao
>>539052560If we didn't have niggers then we wouldn't need the cameras.Just facts.I support the cameras because I'm a good person who is negatively effected by niggers like you.
>>539052560the only amendment needed is no more money for israel
>>539054970This.
>>539052560Wow, a white man infringing on the rights of others?? No fucking way.
>>539055151I'm for that one too. That said, the amendment described in OP would take care of a good portion of the JQ.
>>539052560Unfortunately the Rosicrucians in charge of crime fighting use Christian morals to define crime. This will be the defining conflict of your generation.
>>539055074Kike poster? Fed? Which military base are you posting from? Cameras won’t stop crime. Look at all the looting of stores that happens. They all have cameras and none of it deters crime. It probably has the opposite of effect of encouraging others to participate. None of it matters to a monkey brained retard.After you tyrannical corrupt criminals build the camera panopticon and the crime rates stay the same you’ll double down. “Oh well you actually need an implantable chip.”“Actually the implantable chip doesn’t provide all the security we need, you’ll need to submit to having your mind being read.”“We actually need cameras in your home.”“Actually we need you to wear a camera at all times.”You faggots are the worst. You did it for McMansions and to get blowies from blown out whores. Y’all are the weakest most submissive faggots that ever existed.
>>539055400Also all these Forbes people, gangstalkers if they exist, etc. are all on the side of God. You literally cannot have Palantir without YHWH
>>539055486This. Why not have a camera in your home? Pretty much every single argument for them putting one up in a park or at an intersection can be made.
Flock Manufacturing Plant1885 Mitchell Rd SE, Suite 600,Mableton, GA 30126Flock Headquarters1170 Howell Mill Rd NW, Suite 210,Atlanta, GA 30318
>>539052560THIS GLOWNIGGER IS SERIOUSLY NAMED LANGLEY?
>>539052560he is part of the new world order dictatorship, its called flock because you are his sheep
>>539054970uncle ted vindicated yet again
>>539054970The cameras are used to stop racist whites. Blacks can still rape and pillage though
crime will be allowed to happen so that you support more and more surveillance and then you will be a slave
>>539052560companies like palantir and flock do not have any rights to exist in America there is nothing in the Constitution that allows or justifies massive panopticon surveillance companies that violate our rightsit should be seen as wholly justified if any American or individual were to kill anyone in these companies who believe that humans are animals to profit off of and keep controlled.if that nigger walked in the street, and someone blew his brains out all over the sidewalk, that person would have done nothing illegal but, in fact, helped save our country from out of control tyrants who should all be exterminated like the rats they all are
>>539056725I agree there shouldn't be this bizarre double standard of corporations being able to get away with tyranny that our Constitution protects our government from pursuing.It doesn't matter who it is coming from. The point is to not allow it to happen, especially as corporations become intertwined or even more powerful than governments.
>>539057195*protects against
>>539052560>Garrett Langleycould they be any more in your face with it? it's almost funny how bold they are now
>>539052792Police as a concept are less than 100 years old. Citizens used to arrest criminals and prosecute. Jews removed these rights so pedophile Freemason Jews can take over the country via the courts.
>>539056610I’ll paraphrase: It wasn’t a crime for the street criminal to keep a knife, but it was a crime for the dissident to keep a knife. The surveillance state is a precursor to greater even more unpopular measures restricting all aspects of our lives. They expect resistance so they need the architecture to identify, track and remove the dissidents.
tar and feather
>>539052560He should know better, he deserves death
