>"white nationalism">"end immigration">"jail the bankers">"jail the pedos"What if the real revolutionary movement is going to be antifeminism?Feminism and Natalism are incompatible. Feminism causes antinatalism.1. What is the primary role of the woman? To be a mother, to have children.2. Can you have feminism and gender roles? No, feminism's primary goal is to abolish gender roles for women. (They dress this up as a matter of "rights", but that's all bullshit if you care to look at facts.)What happens when you have feminism?Fertility rates go below replacement.What happens when populations collapse?Either your economy and nation just "collapse", or you straight up get invaded by someone who can still field an army.It will soon be a matter of national security that women have children, and we will prosecute feminism the same way that we currently prosecute the men's rights movements. People will get canceled, put on government watch lists, etc. And if the government doesn't do this? If the government remains feminist? We will have uprisings. This is what the real people's movement will be. Not "white nationalism". Not "conservatives taking back politics" (because conservatives are usually feminists as well). Not "end immigration" (irrelevant if everyone has too few people to send to the US, and all of the immigrants in the US stop reproducing as well).This isn't "anti-women". It's actually anti-anti-women, because feminism was already anti-women. Anti-feminism is therefore both pro-women and pro-white and pro-humanity. This will be enough for people to rally around.Expect changes in the coming decade. There are plenty of men who have had enough.
>>539098150Feminism is whichever opinion the woman currently talking is. Pay celebrities to says that feminism is now about making a men work to support you and it's what women will believe. Logic need not apply. In fact, "Not a feeling" is a valid answer.
>What is the primary role of the man? To be a father, to have children.Yet I bet you think that your office job has divine purpose or something.
Incel thread, real men rape and dump>t. White nigger
>>539098243>Feminism is whichever opinion the woman currently talking is.There are many philosophical factions of feminism. I'm not saying what feminism *is* from that philosophical angle. I'm saying what it *is* in summation of all of those factions. They serve a common purpose.>>539098287>Yet I bet you think that your office job has divine purpose or something.Supporting a family with an office job would unironically be a divine purpose, you spiritless trash.
>>539098150You will never get far if you start your initial effort with something explicitly dishonest and try to sell it to people at face value. "Woman is first and foremost a mother" already belittles women, encroaching on their very agency as human beings. It’s not even about genders, it’s about denying half the population the freedom to be in control of their own lives. If you actually want to increase the birth rates, you may want to start with something more appealing to women, which does not kickstart the dialogue with "ok, so we want to make you a slave, now let me explain how this is a good thing for you and a morally right thing to do". You won't get very far with this rhetoric.
>>539098150>white nationalismdeprives Arabs of millions of White Slaves. https://write.as/mwq381bw4r7ms.md
>>539098321The only common point all the feminists have is that they are IDpol that want politic to give special rights to women at the expense of "the rest of society". And you know what? This is exactly what marriage and what they call the patriarchy is. If you just change the semantic, feminists become proud tradviwes.
>>539098376>it’s about denying half the population the freedom to be in control of their own lives.They are not free, they are following trends. Trends that are artificials. Why do you think so many of them need therapy and antidepresants? They didn't needed that when they were more than a person.
>>539098150Jewish basic bitch Judeo NPC Cringe Roasties = (((Liberals and / or Neo Con "TRAD" looking for "BRAD" and / or / then a good goy tool...)))tldr, Anon
>>539098376i think you are making an assumption here that is wrong.noone in society is free or can be free.men have duties and women have duties you cant deny those and still have society work.
>>539098473Governments = BDSM Jewish Niggerized Piggerized Faggotized hypocritical faggot versionAn Actual Straight White Non Jewish Man doesn't want any government, just natural law, natural borders / boundaries and territory and community amongst one's own people, AnonSeparate societies and then separate territoriesMany disagree regarding "muh society"
>>539098150>feminism's primary goal is to abolish gender roles for womenWrong, if you were to abolish the roles with no further interference, people would converge back to their roles. No, they want privileges and handouts, redistribution until they have dominance.>Expect changes in the coming decade. There are plenty of men who have had enough.Where are you seeing this? Delusional.
>>539098376Women are property first actually, AnniePushing to have kids right away is cringe, especially for checklist reasons or a "TRAD" image ... Actual genuine relationships should be formed first , women should be supportive and enjoyable first
>>539098718This Anon get it. There is a reason why 0 fult unilateral divorces that give you hale the money and half the income exist.
>>539098243> it's what women will believefeminism isnt what women believe, feminism is adultery and infanticide. just like neoliberalism isnt that foucalt raped tunisian boys as a faggot, its that foucalt taught the tunisian boys that their socially constructed sense of masculinity was holding them back from monetary gain
>>539098521>They are not free, they are following trends.To that I agree. Which is why this "let me rationally explain to you how you not being in the kitchen will cause society to collapse" thing will never work and it’s the very point I am making. Make it trendy to have 5 children - and they will do it. Make it popular to have none at all and they will choose that instead. With that being said, this is not a gender thing at all. Men are exactly the same and 95% will follow and do whatever is socially acceptable and encouraged by the society right now. In a Nazi Germany they will be nationalists. In a liberal California the very same people would be the most staunch supporters of minority rights and democracy. The absolute majority of people, regardless of gender do not think, just follow trends created by others. And they aren't to be despised for it, it’s just how people survive. If you want them to do something, being rational about it in exchange for bad optics isn’t going to work.
>>539098819in the Bible, people are always ahajariah son of elcanaminidab, fatherhood is believed to be vastly more important than motherhood, so much that God calls Himself your Father. in 19th century england, suddenly the law is changed that the woman gets custody of the kid in the divorce
>>539098873>Make it trendy to have 5 children - and they will do it. Make it popular to have none at all and they will choose that instead.whats needed is for women to not be allowed to divorce their husbands. then women who had long marriages and many children will lord it over the whores in church, and all women will want to be the woman who only had one dick in her entire life and stayed married for 50 years and had 5 sons and 15 grandsons in church with her
>>539098718>Where are you seeing this? Delusional.Think Pete Hegseth 100x (and applied to non-military things). We're in the early stages of a transition.As I said, we already have propaganda against things like men's rights, MGTOW, etc. People were canceled, deplatformed, brought in for questioning. The machinery exists to do the exact same thing for feminism. That's only one piece, of course.
>>539098376>"Woman is first and foremost a mother" already belittles women, encroaching on their very agency as human beings.You are first and foremost a retarded motherfucker. See, now that is belittling and encroaching on your agency as a human being.Why would I say something like that?1. Because you genuinely think your faggotry has any place on this board.2. Because you think gender roles were ever based in law and therefore "taking away freedoms".
>>539099010questioning any aspect of neoliberalism — central banking, child prostitution, corporate raiding, feminism — is all the same, criticism of neoliberalism
>>539099152Feminism is going to be the most immediately tangible enemy for most people. The other stuff is bad but abstracted or hidden. Feminism is the ideology of more than 50% of the population, and now a majority of women hate men. Not exaggerating. The stats show it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-men-femosphere-new-statesman-poll-b2958208.htmlIt's coincidentally in the state's interest to ultimately agree with anti-feminism. Will be quite interesting see what comes next though.
>>539099152What if there simply is no neoliberalism without feminism? Women outnumber male voters by 20M in the US. The Overton window that existed prior to this change is utterly unrecognizable today.
>>539098376If men can be forced into conscription and/or the draft for military service, women can be forced to give birth to children and be mothers. Simple as.
>>539098150>>539098243>>539098287>>539098288>>539098321OP, as long as you are heterosexual, you worship women. evident by the seething replies you will soon receive
>>539098150On one hand I want to see feminism outed but on the other hand I want to see them actually get what they say they want "equality", I would love to see men actually treat them equally because that would mean that men would stop doing favors for them just because they have a pussy and then they would struggle with lots of issues that they would have normally just taken for granted in the past.
Bring back the Patriarchy.
