The official narrative is that lightning strikes are causing the fires in Canada.Why aren't lightning strikes happening in Nunavut?Is something else missing from there SAARS?
>>539100293Too cold for leftists
What's the key variable producing these fires, I wonder?
>>539100293>Why aren't lightning strikes happening in Nunavut?This is literally an 8th grade science question.
>>539100293its the chinese doing it. they invaded canada.
>>539100409It's a maïeutic question, of course lightning strikes also happen in Nunavut.
>>539100412Also strongly possible. Could be literal marxist sabotage.
>>539100346>>539100493
>>539100293Nunavut isn’t included in the ring of fire footprint. They’re only burning out reserves between pickle lake/cat lake just to east of Thunder Bay so they can start mining and putting up accompanying infrastructure
>Muh there's no trees in NunavutThere are in the Southern part, this is Ennadai Lake, Nunavut.
Another picture of Ennadai Lake.All the Southern lakes look like this.Why aren't there fires in the area?
>>539100293It's great seeing mutts getting choked by smoke while suffering from diarrhea
>>539100293What happens here? This is a huge land mass that just seems totally deserted.
>>539100293It’s all fake news it isn’t actually real.
>>539100293The smoke is so bad in the upper midwest, there is a rumor going around that spending one hour outside breathing the air is the equivalent to smoking a pack of cigarettes on your lungs
>>539100293Someone should check the lightning strike databases. The elites don't even scrub Mossad's search queries from google's public history, so they definitely didn't place lightning strike records for the times and locations of Canada's fires into the databases. It could conclusively prove the lightning story to be bullshit.
>>539105081Mostly inuit settlements and scientific bases from what I understood.
>>539100293>Is something else missing from there SAARS?yeah, eco terrorist arsonists
>>539109022Absolutely possible.These must be schizophrenic leftists tho, a true right wing environmentalist would never destroy nature to prove their point.
>>539100293That's bullshit. Wildfires are caused by humans, every time.
>>539105081it's mostly just chugs and polar bears
>>539100293>The treeline (or timberline) is the boundary—either high on a mountain or in extreme northern/southern latitudes—beyond which environmental conditions are too harsh for trees to grow. Past this point, the landscape transitions into treeless, exposed terrain like the arctic tundra or an alpine zoneGo make a chocolate clock, you retarded nigger.
>>539109759You are actually wrong. Are you even Canadian?>>539103164>>539103681
>>539102037WINNER!GAGNANT!
>>539105081Honestly, what happens there is the bare minimum for us to continue claiming the territory as Canadian. We rounded up the nomadic natives and forced them to live in fixed locations and carry ID. Now, we pay them ("Canadian Rangers") army bux to go to remote islands that COULD be contested, and fucking WALK AROUND because the presence of their footprints maintains our land claim. That is, aside from the scientific and military bases.
>>539100412Forest interference. They electronically hacked the trees so they would burn.
>>539105081Also, I should say that that landmass has almost no soil. Not enough to grow shit, nevermind the 3-month growing season. Not enough to dig into to bury pipes n sheeit. Some places have to place an order for the whole town's needs once or twice a year, and wait for a cargo ship to come by and dump it all.
>>539109801Yes, okay, faggot. We said no trees. You found one stupid exception and doubled down like a faggot nigger. Good for you.
>>539100293>Lightning in the northern tundraOkay retard.
>>539110466Since we now have established that there are trees in the South part of Nunavut, why aren't wildfires happening here?
Threadly reminder that the boreal forest is a fire adapted ecosystem and always has been. The only difference is that more area is burning on average since about 2000, but there are actually fewer fires than the period between the 80s and 2000. Arson is not a good explanation.
>>539110618Just looking at your picture:>it's a cold, damp swamp>fires require hot and dry>difficult for the fire to travel because there's fucking water everywhere.>also because you have bare rock with patches of grass>little dried, dead material to ignite.>"Ennadai, Nunavut, currently has a population of zero. The area was abandoned in the mid-1950s following the relocation of the local Ahiarmiut">therefore, zero human activity
>>539111644If that were true, why do fires happen more North in the NW territories, where it is also often significantly more damp?
>>539111644Also I've seen videos on X of inuits roaming around in the Ennadai area, it's not fully uninhabited.
The amount of people doing backflips for the canadian government now, inclusing US progressives, astounds me. It really goes to show that if progressive Canadians were caught slitting the throat of a 1000 5 year olds annually, progressives would be like "What do you mean, is that a problem? What do you want them to do about it?" They just pretend not to understand, making discourse impossible. Evil people.
