The official narrative is that lightning strikes are causing the fires in Canada.Why aren't lightning strikes happening in Nunavut?Is something else missing from there SAARS?
>>539100293Too cold for leftists
What's the key variable producing these fires, I wonder?
>>539100293>Why aren't lightning strikes happening in Nunavut?This is literally an 8th grade science question.
>>539100293its the chinese doing it. they invaded canada.
>>539100409It's a maïeutic question, of course lightning strikes also happen in Nunavut.
>>539100412Also strongly possible. Could be literal marxist sabotage.
>>539100346>>539100493
>>539100293Nunavut isn’t included in the ring of fire footprint. They’re only burning out reserves between pickle lake/cat lake just to east of Thunder Bay so they can start mining and putting up accompanying infrastructure
>Muh there's no trees in NunavutThere are in the Southern part, this is Ennadai Lake, Nunavut.
Another picture of Ennadai Lake.All the Southern lakes look like this.Why aren't there fires in the area?
>>539100293It's great seeing mutts getting choked by smoke while suffering from diarrhea
>>539100293What happens here? This is a huge land mass that just seems totally deserted.
>>539100293It’s all fake news it isn’t actually real.
>>539100293The smoke is so bad in the upper midwest, there is a rumor going around that spending one hour outside breathing the air is the equivalent to smoking a pack of cigarettes on your lungs
>>539100293Someone should check the lightning strike databases. The elites don't even scrub Mossad's search queries from google's public history, so they definitely didn't place lightning strike records for the times and locations of Canada's fires into the databases. It could conclusively prove the lightning story to be bullshit.
>>539105081Mostly inuit settlements and scientific bases from what I understood.
>>539100293>Is something else missing from there SAARS?yeah, eco terrorist arsonists
>>539109022Absolutely possible.These must be schizophrenic leftists tho, a true right wing environmentalist would never destroy nature to prove their point.
>>539100293That's bullshit. Wildfires are caused by humans, every time.
>>539105081it's mostly just chugs and polar bears
>>539100293>The treeline (or timberline) is the boundary—either high on a mountain or in extreme northern/southern latitudes—beyond which environmental conditions are too harsh for trees to grow. Past this point, the landscape transitions into treeless, exposed terrain like the arctic tundra or an alpine zoneGo make a chocolate clock, you retarded nigger.
>>539109759You are actually wrong. Are you even Canadian?>>539103164>>539103681
>>539102037WINNER!GAGNANT!
>>539105081Honestly, what happens there is the bare minimum for us to continue claiming the territory as Canadian. We rounded up the nomadic natives and forced them to live in fixed locations and carry ID. Now, we pay them ("Canadian Rangers") army bux to go to remote islands that COULD be contested, and fucking WALK AROUND because the presence of their footprints maintains our land claim. That is, aside from the scientific and military bases.
>>539100412Forest interference. They electronically hacked the trees so they would burn.
>>539105081Also, I should say that that landmass has almost no soil. Not enough to grow shit, nevermind the 3-month growing season. Not enough to dig into to bury pipes n sheeit. Some places have to place an order for the whole town's needs once or twice a year, and wait for a cargo ship to come by and dump it all.
>>539109801Yes, okay, faggot. We said no trees. You found one stupid exception and doubled down like a faggot nigger. Good for you.
>>539100293>Lightning in the northern tundraOkay retard.
>>539110466Since we now have established that there are trees in the South part of Nunavut, why aren't wildfires happening here?
Threadly reminder that the boreal forest is a fire adapted ecosystem and always has been. The only difference is that more area is burning on average since about 2000, but there are actually fewer fires than the period between the 80s and 2000. Arson is not a good explanation.
>>539110618Just looking at your picture:>it's a cold, damp swamp>fires require hot and dry>difficult for the fire to travel because there's fucking water everywhere.>also because you have bare rock with patches of grass>little dried, dead material to ignite.>"Ennadai, Nunavut, currently has a population of zero. The area was abandoned in the mid-1950s following the relocation of the local Ahiarmiut">therefore, zero human activity
>>539111644If that were true, why do fires happen more North in the NW territories, where it is also often significantly more damp?
>>539111644Also I've seen videos on X of inuits roaming around in the Ennadai area, it's not fully uninhabited.
The amount of people doing backflips for the canadian government now, inclusing US progressives, astounds me. It really goes to show that if progressive Canadians were caught slitting the throat of a 1000 5 year olds annually, progressives would be like "What do you mean, is that a problem? What do you want them to do about it?" They just pretend not to understand, making discourse impossible. Evil people.
>>539100293>Is something else missing from theretrees?
It seems there's a lot of pajeets, pakistanis and filipinos in the Yellowknife area.That's also where most of the fires are happening.
>>539111928Already addressed, there are trees in the South of Nunavut.>>539103164>>539103681
>>539100293Native people are allowed to perform land clearing without being fined.
>>539109283of course, because there arent really many tards on the right that are of that flavor of delusion that they believe the case for co2 has ever been remotely close to having been proven, much less akshually proven (it hasnt. ever.)
>>539105081Fake Mars rovers and dead whales
>>539112104Yes native drunkards are probably also some of the main culprits.
>>539100348> the key variablethe trees, of which Nunavut has few
>>539111736I don't know faggot, maybe because you can't just assume climate and ecosystem by simple latitude, you fucking nigger. The forest is thick there, and the west side of NWT isn't on the Canadian Shield.
government starts the fires to push the climate change scam to increase taxes on retarded goycattle
>>539111736>why do fires happen more North in the NW territories
>>539103681That looks like a very moist and sparse forest literally surrounded by water. In fact the area in the background has been logged and only tiny trees are growing back there. There's not much fire fuel here. You should just read up on this stuff instead of acting retarded. Or use your brain power to solve landslides wiping out whole towns in your shithole instead =^D
>>539112478Cheesenigger doesn't understand our basic geography, but wants to tism because he has google.
>>539105081State sponsored alcoholic inuits beating their wives (nieces)
Business as usual. They're burning down the land, buying it up for pennies on the dollar, and building data centers on them.
>>539105081The north is just rock and ice, the tundra is mucky, and the forests don't get hot enough to evaporate their moisture.
>>539113441Yeah, usually if we get up to 80-100 fires up here, MNR gets uppity and stomps em as hard as they can. There's 180 fires and they don't seem to be moving as fast. A lot of the area burning is where new pipelines and roads and sheeit are planned for. Easier job after it's all burned down. Very curious...
canada is huge and there are forest fires all over every single year
>>539100293they start their own fires to open up more land for development, duhdispersing bio-chemical goyim poison is an ancillary bonus.or it is the other way around?
